Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Marsh Accretion with Sea Level Rise Steve Crooks, Matt Brennan, Justin Vandever, Jeremy Lowe, PWA John Callaway, USF Diane Stralberg, PRBO RSM Science.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Marsh Accretion with Sea Level Rise Steve Crooks, Matt Brennan, Justin Vandever, Jeremy Lowe, PWA John Callaway, USF Diane Stralberg, PRBO RSM Science."— Presentation transcript:

1 Marsh Accretion with Sea Level Rise Steve Crooks, Matt Brennan, Justin Vandever, Jeremy Lowe, PWA John Callaway, USF Diane Stralberg, PRBO RSM Science Workshop April 14, 2010

2 Sensitivity of bird habitat to sea level rise Long term habitat evolution and sustainability of restored habitats Quantification of carbon sequestration with sea level rise

3 Marsh Elevation Marsh elevation response to: initial bed elevation, suspended sediment concentration, organic material accumulation, rate of sea level rise, and subsidence and compaction

4 Marsh98 Based on mass balance calculations described by Krone (1987) Accretion rate depends on: availability of suspended sediment depth and period of inundation As marsh aggrades, frequency and duration of flooding decreases and accretion rate decreases.

5 Sedimentation in tidal wetlands

6 Mineral sedimentation model Vegetation colonization elevation

7 Natural Marshplain Elevation in 2100 (relative to rising tidal waters) Dry density of carbon: 500 kg m 3 Initial marsh elevation: MHHW Orr, Crooks and Williams 2003 Will Restored Tidal Marshes Be Sustainable? San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Vol. 1, Issue 1 (2003), Article 5. Vegetation die-back

8 Restored Marshplain Elevation in 2100 (relative to rising tidal waters) Dry density of carbon: 500 kg m 3 Initial marsh elevation: -0.5m MHHW Orr, Crooks and Williams 2003 Will Restored Tidal Marshes Be Sustainable? San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Vol. 1, Issue 1 (2003), Article 5. Vegetation die-back

9 Model Revisions Allows acceleration of rate of sea level rise NRC-I (0.5m rise) NRC-III (1.5m rise) Organic matter added directly to bed elevation

10 ASA/GSFC/METI/ERSDAC/JAROS, and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team March 3, 2000 Richardson Bay Petaluma Estuary San Pablo Bay

11 Approach Bio-geomorphic units Sediment supply Organic accumulation Sea level rise 100 year time frame

12 Model Runs Initial Bed Elevation Colonization elevation (+1.3m MLLW) MHHW (+1.8m MLLW) Subtidal, minimal waves (-0.6m MLLW) SSC 25, 50, 100, 150, 300 mg/l Organic Matter 0, 1, 2, 3 mm/yr Rate of Sea Level Rise NRC-I, NRC-III

13 Low sediment availability Converts to mudflat SLR Scenario: NRC-III Suspended Sediment Conc: 25 mg/L Organic sedimentation rate: 1.0 mm/yr

14 Medium sediment availability Tracks colonization elevation SLR Scenario: NRC-III Suspended Sediment Conc: 150 mg/L Organic sedimentation rate: 1.0 mm/yr

15 High sediment availability Keeps pace with SLR SLR Scenario: NRC-III Suspended Sediment Conc: 300 mg/L Organic sedimentation rate: 1.0 mm/yr

16 High initial elevation has larger net change in elevation as less frequently inundated and receives less sediment. Higher organic accretion raises bed elevations and reduces inundation period and inorganic accretion rate.

17 25mg/l – unlikely to sustain marshes 50mg/l – sustain marshes only under most favorable conditions (high initial elevation and organic accumulation) 100-150mg/l – sustain marshes for particular combinations

18 Next Steps Influence of waves Compaction and subsidence Integration in SLAMM-type model


Download ppt "Marsh Accretion with Sea Level Rise Steve Crooks, Matt Brennan, Justin Vandever, Jeremy Lowe, PWA John Callaway, USF Diane Stralberg, PRBO RSM Science."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google