2. Self Evaluation of School Libraries in the USA Dr. Nancy Everhart Florida State University

3. Good afternoon!

4. Florida State University

6. Tallahassee, Florida

8. Topical Outline  Advantages of a national self-evaluation model  Similarities and differences of school libraries in the U.S. and Portugal  School library evaluation in the U.S.  National  State  Similarities and differences in relation to the auto- evaluation model  Possible next steps

9. Congratulations!

10. “The School Libraries Network in Portugal” Jeremy Saunders School Libraries in View Issue 22: Spring 2006

11. How are school libraries alike and how are they different in the USA and Portugal?

12. Universal truths  We want teacher-librarians and school libraries to make a difference.  We want students to become lifelong learners.  We want school libraries and teacher-librarians to be valued.  Evidence and evaluation are so very important.

13. First Lady Laura Bush former teacher-librarian

15. Recent newspaper headlines  Officials Defend Cuts for Dayton Schools. November 15, 2006. Dayton Daily News (Ohio)  Librarian Protests Provo District Cuts. May 8, 2006. Desert News (Utah)  After Budget Cuts, Aides Running School Libraries. September 2, 2008. The Arizona Republic (Arizona)  In Parents’ Book, Library Cuts Go Too Far. December 23, 2007. Los Angeles Times (California)

16. Advantages of a national evaluation model  Describe institutional characteristics  Enlist cooperation from administrators and faculty  Understand changes in user behavior  Compare information from peer institutions  Identify best practices  Increase assessment capacity

17. National U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics Schools and Staffing Survey – School Libraries

18.  Longitudinal survey  School Libraries Count!  2007 & 2008  Health of school library media programs

19. Staff Activities

20. Hours Open Per Week

21. Collections

22. Computers

23. Visits

24. Expenditures

26. Schools and Staffing Survey School Libraries School library media center surveys are designed to obtain information about the amount and experience of library staff, and the organization, expenditures, and collections of the library media center.

29. Research

30. Achievement data  Hours of endorsed library media specialists per 100 students  Total LMC staff per 100 students  Weekly LMC visits per student  Weekly circulation per student  Net loan rate  Interlibrary loans per 100 circulations ratio  Time spent in leadership  Time spent in collaboration  Volumes per student  Print subscriptions per 100 students  Video material per 100 students  Computer software per 100 students  Print materials expenditures per student  Electronic format expenditures per student  Non-print materials expenditures per student  Total operating expenditures per student

31. Self-Evaluation Instruments Examples by States

32. ExC 3 EL – Expectations for Collaboration, Collections, and Connections to Enhance Learning: A Program Evaluation Rubric

33. Components  Instruction  Curriculum assessment/support  Resource management  Program administration  Environment

34. Instructional Support 1Materials, reserve collections, bibliographies, etc. are occasionally provided. 2Materials, reserve collections, bibliographies, websites, etc. are occasionally provided or when requested. 3Materials, reserve collections, bibliographies, websites, etc. are provided in conjunction with collaborative planning. 4Systematic consultations and planning occur with instructional design team and/or curriculum council to ensure maximum use of LMC resources and staff development sessions offered by or coordinated through LM program

35. Achieving Exemplary School Libraries: School Library Media Program Recommendations and Evaluation Rubrics

36. Components  Collaborative planning  Flexible scheduling  Resources  Reading  Data collection  Decision-making committees  Advisory committees  Staffing, funding and facilities  Faculty, student, and administrator survey

37. Reading  Exemplary - Objective 4 is exceeded.  The media center professional staff are actively involved with the planning and implementation of the school’s reading initiatives, events, and activities.  At the elementary level more that 75 percent of students participate in one or more reading events or activities throughout the year.  At the secondary level, more than 30 percent of students participate in one or more reading events or activities throughout the year.  The LMC professional staff report regularly to the school and district leadership data showing the effect of the reading initiatives, events, and activities on student reading attitudes and achievement

38. School Library Media Program Evaluation Rubric School Library Media Program Evaluation Rubric

39. Components  Professional staff  Support staff  Facilities  Climate  Collection  Scheduling  Collaborative planning  Collaborative teaching and learning  Library automation  Technology for instruction and access  Networking  Budget  Administrative support  Professional development  Advisory committee

40. Facilities Non-existentIn progressBasicProficientExemplary NO SCHOOL LIBRARY. Do not complete rest of form. Library space arranged traditionally with large tables for whole class instruction. No space for simultaneous whole class and individual student use. Library space accommodates whole class. Limited space and furniture for simultaneous class, small group, and individual use. Large, flexible library facility with space and furniture available for simultaneous whole class, small group, and individual use. At least two groups able to work in library at the same time. Very large, flexible library facility with space and furniture for simultaneous scheduling of multiple groups of students. Production space, presentation space, and flexibility in design provided in the library.

41. What Evidence do Principals Use to Evaluate Teacher- Librarians? Relationships to the National Model

42. Most Prominent Forms of Evidence 1.Informal visits 2.Faculty interviews 3.Examine student work for evidence of library use 4.Student interviews 5.Library use reports 6.Standardized test scores 7.Teacher lesson plans 8.Librarian lesson plans 9.Faculty Surveys 10.Non-teaching observation 11.Circulation Reports 12.Teaching observation 13. Budget reports 14. Student surveys

43. When you visit the library informally what leads you to believe that appropriate activities are happening?  Students are “actively engaged” with books or technology  Librarian is interacting with teachers and students  Organized, clean, inviting environment  Variety of materials available  Relevant displays  Students are borrowing books

44. When you visit the library informally what strikes you that appropriate activities are not ongoing?  The library is empty  Materials in poor condition  Students doing busy work  Students made to feel unwelcome  Materials going unused

45. When you examine student work for evidence of library use, what do you look for?  References students have consulted  Work that supports the school’s goals  A literary quality to writing  Presenting results of inquiry in a variety of ways

46. What types of informal interviews do you conduct with students to get a feeling that the library is operating effectively ?  Asks students, “What are you reading?”  Asks students, “What did you learn in the library today?”  Asks students, “Does the library have good books?”  Asks students, “Can you find what you need in the library?”

47. What types of informal interviews do you conduct with faculty to determine if the library is operating effectively?  Tries to find out how knowledgeable the librarian is  Looks to see if teachers are enthusiastic about taking their classes to the library  Asks teachers if they feel that staff development activities conducted by the librarian are useful  Tries to determine how extensively the library is being used

48. How are we alike and how are we different generally in relation to school library evaluation?

49. How are we alike and how are we different specifically in relation to the self-evaluation model?

50. How are we alike?

51. Areas being assessed  Support for curriculum development  Reading and literacy  Projects, partnerships, and free activities open to the community  Management of the school library

52. How are we different?

53. Areas being assessed  Support for curriculum development  Reading and literacy  Projects, partnerships, and free activities open to the community  Management of the school library

54. Overall impressions  Richness of evidence  Instructions on what to do after evidence is collected  Faculty and community involvement  Reflection  Other

55. Next steps  Link to research  Dissemination  Best practices  Collaboration  Web 2.0

57. Share Your Story Ask Your Questions

58. Contact Information Nancy Everhart everhart@ci.fsu.edu (also on facebook) Project LEAD ci.fsu.edu/projectlead