Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySusanna O’Neal’ Modified over 9 years ago
1
Assessment of project proposals within EU grant schemes 17 & 18 December 2013 Government Office for Cooperation with NGOs Zagreb VLADA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE Ured za udruge This project is financed by the European Union
2
Welcome – Day 1 Ana Ugrina 2
3
Purpose, Methodology, Contents Petrus Theunisz 3
4
Purpose Engaging public administration bodies in charge of managing Call for Proposals in developing, defining and applying a set of unified assessment Collecting feedback on the Guidelines for Assessors, Evaluation Matrices and other tools. 4
5
Methodology Welcomes, brief verbal presentations / reflections Introductions, brief verbal presentations Modules, lectures with questions and answers Exercises, small group work, reflections, questions and answers Closures, short brief summary 5
6
Contents: Modules Module 1 – Assessment of Project Proposals Module 2 – Unified Assessment Criteria Module 3 – From IPA to ESF Module 4 –Scoring, Commenting and Quality Assurance 6
7
Contents: Exercises Exercise 1 – Application Forms, Evaluation Grids and Unified Assessment Criteria Exercise 2 – From IPA to ESF 7
8
Materials Guidelines for Assessors Annex 1 – draft Evaluation Matrix Concept Note Annex 2 – draft Evaluation Matrix Full Application Annex 3 – concept ESF Evaluation Grid 8
9
Module 1 Assessment of Project Proposals 9
10
Assessment of Project Proposals Experiences Quality Attributes, Criteria and Standards 10
11
Assessment of Project Proposals Experiences 11
12
Assessment of Project Proposals Quality 12
13
Assessment of Project Proposals Attributes, Criteria and Standards 13
14
Attributes, Criteria & Standards 3 Attributes: – A - Relevance – B - Feasibility + Sustainability – C - Project Management 16 Criteria: – A 1 - A 5 – B 6 - B 11 – C 12 - C 16 64 Standards – A 1.1; A 1.2; A n – B 6.1; B 6.2; B n; – C 12.1; C 12.2 - C 16.5 EC PCM Guidelines Chapter 4, page 23 The EU PCM Quality Framework contains 3 Attributes, 16 Criteria and 64 Standards
15
Attributes, Criteria & Standards 5 + 1 Attributes: – A - Relevance – B – Efficiency – C – Effectiveness – D – Impact – E – Sustainability – F – Capacity 6 CN and 13 FA Evaluation Questions 19 CN and 48 FA Assessment Criteria N Indicators The project proposal assessment Quality Framework contains 6 Attributes, 19 Evaluation Questions (6 + 13), 77 (indicative) Assessment Criteria, n Indicators
16
Exercise 1 16
17
Exercise 1 (1 h 15 min + 15 min) Study the Application Form template Study the Concept Note and Full Application Evaluation Grid Check and comment on Unified Assessment Criteria for concept note section 1 and full application section 1 to 6 Present findings in a 15 minute plenary presentation 17
18
Module 2 Unified Assessment Criteria 18
19
Unified Assessment Criteria Relevance CN 1.1 Objectives of the CfP Priorities of the CfP 19
20
Unified Assessment Criteria Relevance CN 1.2: Geographic: Needs Geographic: Constraints Synergy Duplication? 20
21
Unified Assessment Criteria Relevance CN 1.3: Target Groups and Final Beneficiaries Quantitative and Qualitative Definition of Problems and Needs Addressing Problems and Needs 21
22
Unified Assessment Criteria Relevance CN 1.4: Cross Cutting Issues Innovation Good Practice 22
23
Unified Assessment Criteria Capacity – FA 1.1 - Project Management: Applicant Co-Applicant(s) Affiliate 23
24
Unified Assessment Criteria Capacity – FA 1.2 – Technical Expertise: Applicant Co-Applicant(s) Affiliate(s) 24
25
Unified Assessment Criteria Capacity – FA 1.3 – Management: Applicant Co-Applicant(s) Affiliate(s) 25
26
Unified Assessment Criteria Capacity – FA 1.4 – Financial: Sufficient Stable Diverse Co-Financing ! Only for the Applicant 26
27
Unified Assessment Criteria Feasibility – FA 3.1 - Activities Consistent Appropriate Practical 27
28
Unified Assessment Criteria Activities – FA 3.2 – Action Plan Format Consistency Realistic / Achievable 28
29
Unified Assessment Criteria Feasibility – FA 3.3 – PCM Logical Framework Objectively Verifiable Indicators Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting 29
30
Unified Assessment Criteria Feasibility – FA 3.4 – Participation Partnership, sensible, balanced Roles, responsibilities, based on core competences Track Record 30
31
Unified Assessment Criteria Impact – FA 4.1 Target Groups > External Environment Final Beneficiaries > External Environment 31
32
Unified Assessment Criteria Sustainability – FA 4.2 – Multipliers Concrete Measures Applicant, Co-Applicants, Affiliates Target Groups, Final Beneficiaries 32
33
Unified Assessment Criteria Sustainability – FA 4.3 Ownership Sectoral Political Institutional Financial Environmental 33
34
Unified Assessment Criteria Budget – FA 5.1 – Appropriateness Format, by costs and NOT by activity Exclusion / Inclusion Calculations, Clarifications & Justifications Sources of Funding Contributions, Revenues Changes between CN and FA 34
35
Unified Assessment Criteria Budget – FA 5.2 – Cost / Benefit Ratios General Cost / Benefit Ratio Specific Cost / Benefit Ratios – HR – Travel – Equipment & Supplies – Local Office – Other Costs, Services – Other 35
36
Closure 36
37
Welcome – Day 2 Ana Ugrina 37
38
Module 3 From IPA to ESF 38
39
From IPA to ESF Guidelines for Assessors – General Guidelines – Specific Guidelines Unified Assessment Criteria 39
40
Feedback 40
41
From IPA to ESF Towards a unified and standardized ESF evaluation process? 41
42
Exercise 2 42
43
Exercise 2 (1 h 15 min + 15 min) Study the ESF Evaluation Grid Compare the EU Evaluation Grid with the ESF Evaluation Grid Develop and define Unified Assessment Criteria for all sections (1 to 6) Present findings in a 15 minute plenary presentation 43
44
Module 4 Scoring, Commenting and Quality Assurance 44
45
Scoring 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 45
46
Scoring Very good, good, adequate, poor, very poor 46
47
47 Scoring
48
Commenting Concise, should provide a lot of information in a few words; brief and comprehensive Pertinent, applicable to the Evaluation Question; should not address a matter that the EQ does not cover 48
49
49 Synthesis
50
score = 5, only positive comments score = 4, positive and negative comments, balance = 1 negative comment score = 3, positive and negative comments, balance = 2 negative comments score = 2, positive and negative comments, balance = 3 negative comments score = 1, only negative comments 50
51
Quality Assurance Overall Evaluation Process Individual Assessments 51
52
Closure 52
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.