1. www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu 2nd Meeting Rome, 22nd March 2012 1 JHEP Coordination Action in support of the implementation of a Joint Programming Initiative (JPI) on Cultural Heritage and Global Change: a new challenge for Europe JHEP – GA Amendment JHEP – GA Amendment 2 nd meeting Roma, 22 nd March 2011 Patrizia Bianconi – JHEP Project Management

2. www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu JHEP : WORKPACKAGES 2nd Meeting Rome, 22nd March 2012

3. www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu JHEP : WORKPROJECT DESCRIPTION WP4 EXTENDING THE PARTNERSHIP AND COOPERATION Task 4.1 Creating synergies Cooperation and Partnership Task 4.2. Creating Synergies with Cultural Heritage JPI Partnership and advanced economies (USA, Japan) together with BRIC countries; Extending Cooperation at Global Level Task 4.3 Extending Network and Cooperation to International Organizations and NGOs (i.e. UN Organizations) Task 4.4 Conclusions for future Cultural Heritage Research Policy Making, Programming and Funding together with Joint Actions both at European and global level Lead Partner: TUBITAK, Turkey 2nd Meeting Rome, 22nd March 2012

4. www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu JHEP : WORKPROJECT PROPOSAL WP4 EXTENDING THE PARTNERSHIP AND COOPERATION Task 4.1 Creating synergies Cooperation and Partnership (Task Leader MiBAC, ITALY) Task 4.2. Creating Synergies with Cultural Heritage JPI Partnership and advanced economies (USA, Japan) together with BRIC countries; Extending Cooperation at Global Level (Task Leader AHRC, UK) Task 4.3 Extending Network and Cooperation to International Organizations and NGOs (i.e. UN Organizations) (Task Leader RCE, ND) Task 4.4 Conclusions for future Cultural Heritage Research Policy Making, Programming and Funding together with Joint Actions both at European and global level (Task Leader MICINN, ES) Lead Partner: MIBAC, ITALY 2nd Meeting Rome, 22nd March 2012

5. www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu PROPOSAL OF NEW BUDGET FOR WP4 2nd Meeting Rome, 22nd March 2012

6. www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu 2nd Meeting Rome, 22nd March 2012 The Consortium Agreement says that (point 3.2.2.): “The JHEP Beneficiaries Committee shall validate or not proposals made by the Steering Committee on the following matters: ………… any re-orientation whenever necessary of the Project and modification of the Annex I of the Grant to be agreed by the EC; …….. “Subject to the cases set forth above expressly requiring a unanimous vote or a 2/3 vote, decisions by the JHEP Beneficiaries Committee shall be taken upon a majority of more than fifty per cent of the Beneficiaries present or represented.“

7. www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu What we do for amendment A formal request of amendment letter according to the guidelines: Coordinator's Justification letter +The original withdrawal letter from TUBITAK A new version of the DoW (Description of Work), in a track changes and clean version, with date of the new version stated on the cover page and on each page. A document explaining the re-distribution of tasks which were supposed to be performed by Tubitak and an overview of which partner will have to execute them. A document signed by the coordinator stating the pre-financing amount distributed to TUBITAK and the bank transfer proof.

8. www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu 2nd Meeting Rome, 22nd March 2012