1. Holcomb Bridge Middle School THREE YEAR DATA OVERVIEW FOR SCHOOL STAFF NOVEMBER 2014 CHRISTA EVANS HEATH

2. Purpose This data overview seeks to: ◦Compare Holcomb Bridge Middle’s performance to that of surrounding schools, the county, and the state ◦Examine current strengths in instruction at HBMS based on analysis of a 3 year cohort ◦Identify areas for improvement based on analysis of a 3 year cohort

3. 2012-2013 SIP Goals  Improve student achievement in math  Improve student achievement in reading  Improve student achievement in ELA

6. Holcomb Bridge Middle Student Demographics

7. Subgroup population of 3 year cohort

11. Holcomb Bridge MS Reading Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Demographics YearsAsianAfrican American HispanicWhiteMulti Racial 2011 n=9* Insufficient data 6069908* Insufficient data 2012 n=9* Insufficient data 7573868* Insufficient data 2013 n=9* Insufficient data 75731048* Insufficient data

12. Holcomb Bridge MS Reading Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Sub Groups YearsEDELLSWDNON SWDNON EDNON ELL 2011 n=1352526210101211 2012 n=146192322299226 2013 n=1531824246117252

15. Holcomb Bridge MS Math Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Demographics YearsAsianAfrican AmericanHispanicWhiteMulti Racial 2011 n=9* Insufficient data6071908* Insufficient data 2012 n=9* Insufficient data6775858* Insufficient data 2013 n=9* Insufficient data 77731048* Insufficient data

16. Holcomb Bridge MS Math Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Sub Groups YearsEDELLSWDNON SWDNON EDNON ELL 2011 n=13726 212101211 2012 n=148222322399224 2013 n=1531824246117252

19. Holcomb Bridge MS ELA Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Demographics YearsAsianAfrican AmericanHispanicWhiteMulti Racial 2011 n=9* Insufficient data 6772908* Insufficient data 2012 n=9* Insufficient data 7573868* Insufficient data 2013 n=9* Insufficient data 75731048* Insufficient data

20. Holcomb Bridge MS ELA Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Sub Groups YearsEDELLSWDNON SWDNON EDNON ELL 2011 n=13626 211101211 2012 n=146192322699226 2013 n=1531824226117252

23. Holcomb Bridge MS Social Studies Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Demographics YearsAsianAfrican American HispanicWhiteMulti Racial 2011 n=9* Insufficient data 71 908* Insufficient data 2012 n=9* Insufficient data 6975848* Insufficient data 2013 n=9* Insufficient data 76731048* Insufficient data

24. Holcomb Bridge MS Social Studies Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Sub Groups YearsEDELLSWDNON SWDNON EDNON ELL 2011 n=138262820999211 2012 n=148192522097226 2013 n=1541825246117253

27. Holcomb Bridge MS Science Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Demographics YearsAsianAfrican AmericanHispanicWhiteMulti Racial 2011 n=9* Insufficient data 72 908* Insufficient data 2012 n=9* Insufficient data 6975858* Insufficient data 2013 n=9* Insufficient data 76731048* Insufficient data

28. Holcomb Bridge MS Reading Percentage Meets + Exceeds Disaggregated by Sub Groups YearsEDELLSWDNON SWDNON EDNON ELL 2011 n=1392728211100212 2012 n=150222522398226 2013 n=1541825246117253

29. Current Snap Shot HOLCOMB BRIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL 2014

30. Holcomb Bridge Middle CCRPI Score 86.4 Sum of Achievement, Progress, Achievement Gap, and Challenge Points Achievement PointsProgress PointsAchievement Gap Points Challenge Points Financial Efficiency Rating School Climate Rating ED/EL/SWD Performance Points Exceeding the Bar Points 60.210.412 3.30.5 3.8 Legend: Achievement: Utilizes All Indicators Progress: Utilizes Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) Achievement Gap: Utilizes Lowest Quartile Scale Scores Challenge Points: ED/EL/SWD Performance Points + Exceeding the Bar Points (not to exceed 10 points) N: No Y: Yes 0: 0% of students met the indicator criteria NA: Indicator is not applicable OR data is not available Too Few: Information is not reported on student groups with fewer than 15 School Name CCRPI Score % Free & Red lunch Achievement Points Progress Points Achievement Gap Points ETB Points EL/ED/SWD Performance Points Challenge Points Holcomb Bridge Middle School86.455%60.210.4120.53.33.8 Ridgeview Charter School 78.3 57%588.910.50.50.40.9 CCPRI Index 2014

31. HBMS Strengths HBMS continues to outperform the county and state on Social Studies CRCT tests. HBMS continues to outperform the county and state on Reading Studies CRCT tests. HBMS continues to outperform the county and state on all CRCT tests but ELA. HBMS scores higher to similar area school. HBMS has closed the achievement gap in reading for African American students, students with disabilities, and economically disadvantaged students. HBMS is making huge progress in closing the achievement gap in reading for African American students, students with disabilities, and economically disadvantaged students HBMS is making progress in closing achievement gaps in ELA across all areas.

32. SGPs describe a student's growth relative to his/her academic peers - other students with similar prior achievement (i.e., those with a similar history of scores). 2014 Student Growth Percentile

33. 5 year trends show a double digit gain in the Exceeds category on the CRCT across the whole school and all content areas 2009 vs. 2014 CRCT

34. Our 4 year trends with African-American and Hispanic students show double digit gains in the Exceeds category. 2009-2013 African-American/ Hispanic CRCT Exceeds

35. HBMS Areas of Improvement There is a large gap between Hispanic students and all other demographic subgroups in social studies. There is a large gap between both Hispanic and African American students and White students in social studies and science. There is a large gap between LEP, SWD and ED and Non- SWD and Non-ED students in social studies, math, ela and science.

36. Next Steps As a faculty, we have made tremendous gains toward closing the achievement gaps in reading and math. Our next task is closing the achievement gaps in ela, social studies and science. How can we use the skills we have developed and apply them to make science and social studies content accessible to all students?