Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPreston Barber Modified over 9 years ago
1
APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP [name here] REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR [ESD here]
2
Application is Engineering Workshop Two: Using Student Data to Adjust Instruction Supporting student success on the MSP and beyond
3
Overview of the Series Application and Engineering Design Adjusting Instruction Based on Student Data Implications for Instruction
4
For the Series…Learning Intentions: Understand the technological design process as described in the WA Standards and the NGSS Understand the student expectations for the technological design process in Washington State Standards Understand application item types as assessed on the Measurement of Student Progress
5
For the Series….Learning Intentions Use student data to adjust instruction Apply their understanding of the applications/engineering in the classroom in their own context Identify Academic Vocabulary unique to the Science MSP and the strategies to support ELL students
6
Day 2: Learning Intentions Understand the student expectations for the technological design process in Washington State Standards Use student data to adjust instruction Apply their understanding of the applications/engineering in the classroom in their own context Identify Academic Vocabulary unique to the Science MSP and the strategies to support ELL students
7
Your Turn Take a few minutes to complete the Redesign MSP Item Be conscientious Put yourself in the students’ shoes What is confusing What could foul someone up How does an Application Redesign Item connect to the NGSS?
8
Bridging from New Standards to Current Assessment Where does a Redesign Item sit in the Next Generation Science Standards Design Process?
9
Bridging from New Standards to Current Assessment Where does a Redesign Item sit in an NGSS Design Standard?
10
Bridging from New Standards to Current Asses sment Where does a Redesign Item sit in Science and Engineering Practices?
11
Examining Student Work- LASW Protocol Teachers will work as a Professional Learning Community to: Recognize the structure and purpose of protocols Engage colleagues in a structured, collaborative discussion focused on student learning Gain tools to use in collaborative professional development
12
What are Protocols? Protocols consist of…. Agreed upon structures and guidelines for conversation Vehicles for building the skills and culture necessary for collaborative work LASW Protocols enable educators to carefully and collaboratively examine student and/or teacher work
13
Rationale for Using LASW Protocols Deepens exploration of important ideas in teaching and learning Using a protocol will enhance the probability that everyone will have balanced opportunities to listen, present, examine, question, and respond It’s a good vehicle for surfasing assumptions, values, and beliefs in educational practice
14
Developing shared expectations of student work Developing a rubric Why Use H-M-L Protocols
15
Honing in on Student Performance Read through the HML protocol Identify roles in the group Follow the protocol
16
Exploring the Rubric Together
17
Time Out for a Bio Break
18
Your Turn-Score Your Work Score three student assessments from your class Fold the scoring rubric in half You score on one half then attach to paper your score facing down Trade with a partner for scoring
19
Peer Feedback Partner scores on other half of scoring rubric Discuss and agree If you can’t agree have a third person Once you get your rhythm KEEP SCORING
20
Effective Feedback Read the first page: Feedback as Part of Formative Assessment from How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students by Susan M. Brookhart Note: √ Ideas that reinforce your ideas. ? Ideas you question ! Ideas that surprise you. http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/108019/chapters/Feedback@_An_Overview.aspx
21
Effective Feedback Effective Feedback Chart Look at three student responses from your group of varying quality On a sticky note write what type of feedback you might give that student that would be effective and move their learning Share your feedback ideas with a partner
22
Lunch
23
Marshmallow Challenge
24
Marshmallow Support Structure Design and build the Tallest Free-standing Structure that will support a marshmallow Criteria Constraints The entire marshmallow must be on top Structure must be free- standing Collected measurement data Building and testing completed in 18 minutes Must use materials in the kit but need not use all Must remain standing at end of 18 minutes Structure height must be built and measured from the table (can’t be suspended, etc.)
25
Redesign Opportunity
26
Sense Making and Connections What elements of the Design Process did you see in the Marshmallow Challenge ? Given the learning from the implementation of the Zip Line Challenge and examining data from the student assessments, how can you optimize student engagement with the marshmallow challenge?
27
Your Turn Take a few minutes to complete the Marshmallow Redesign MSP Item Be conscientious Put yourself in the students’ shoes What is confusing What could foul someone up
28
Item Vocabulary Challenges Read the Marshmallow Redesign item prompt Circle any words that might be “barrier words” to your students’ understanding On the T-Chart place the “barrier words” in the appropriate column
29
Criteria for selecting words to teach Think about what are the “barrier words” ◦ Does this word keep the student from understanding the text? Importance of the word for understanding the text ◦ What does the word choice bring to the meaning of the text? (E.g., precision, specificity?) General utility of the word ◦ Is it a word that students are likely to see often in other texts? Are there multiple meanings? ◦ Will it be of use to students in their own writing?
30
Criteria for selecting words to teach Students’ prior knowledge of the word and the concept(s) to which it relates ◦ How does the word relate to other words, ideas, or experiences that the students know or have been learning? ◦ Are there opportunities for grouping words together to enhance understanding of a concept? -- more at K-12 Teachers: Building Comprehension in the Common Core
31
Vocabulary Instruction Meaning of specific words ◦ Provide student-friendly definition(s) ◦ Read the word in text ◦ Discuss examples and non-examples of the word ◦ Create semantic maps ◦ Teach multiple meanings ◦ Link new words to words students already know ◦ (CCSS Language Standard 5) Word-learning strategies ◦ By using contextual cues ◦ By using their existing knowledge of words and word parts
32
Lessons Learned Skim through the 2012 Lessons Learned from Scoring Student Work document from OSPI Note the areas where students at your grade level struggles with Application in particular Which areas of struggle could you intentionally address with your students Discuss your thinking with your elbow partner
33
Next Steps Engage your students in the Marshmallow Challenge Design Challenge BEFORE you administer the post assessment Be intentional about using instructional moves such as: Effective feedback Addressing barrier words in the challenge Thinking about “Lessons Learned” for Application items
34
APPLICATION IS ENGINEERING ON THE SCIENCE MSP [name here] REGIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR [ESD here]
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.