Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMatthew Heath Modified over 9 years ago
1
Agriculture Ventilation Fans: A National Energy Efficiency Standard R. D. MacDonald, P.Eng, M. E. Armstrong, P.Eng, and K. Gibb, Agviro, Inc., Guelph, ON
2
Introduction Increased energy costs and demand management issues have made ventilation fans a large opportunity for utilities and farmers to save $$$ There is no agricultural fan ventilation standard in North America Developing standard that classifies fans into two tiers of energy efficiency Designed for easy cross referencing Method of energy efficiency labeling also proposed.
3
Fan Test Method Based on the ASHRAE Fan Test Standard modified for agriculture by the BESS lab and ASABE Standards and Efficiency Standard EP. Fan Testing ASABE S 565 OCT 2005 Agricultural Ventilation Constant Speed Fan Test Standard Fan Efficiency ASAE/EP566 DEC 01
4
Independent Third Party Fan Performance and Efficiency Verification are: AMCA (Air Movement and Conditioning Association) University of Illinois BESS Laboratory There are no other independent labs in N. America willing to perform these 3 rd party tests at this time. Fan Test Method
5
Measurement Criteria AIR10: AIRflow performance at a static pressure of 0.10” water column VER10: Ventilation Efficiency Ratio at a static pressure of 0.10” w.c AFR: Airflow Ratio. The Air Flow Ratio at a static pressure of 0.2” w.c. divided by the airflow at a static pressure of 0.05” w.c AFR vs. VER10: An analysis considering the combination of AFR and VER10 Fan Test Performance Data
6
Efficiency Metrics 1.VER10 [CFM/W] Example with 18” fans Standard label used by BESS to identify fan performance, at 0.10” (VER05 at m 0.05” was previously used)
7
2.AFR Example for 18” Fans Standard test result published by BESS; air flow at 0.20’/0.05” w.c. Identifier of performance over a wider static range without need to list at static pressures of 0.05” and 0.20” Provides a simpler method of comparing fan performance Efficiency Metrics
8
Method to categorize fans is based on fan diameter in inches; most common N. American sales units Selected sizes: 10”, 12”, 14”, 16”, 18”, 20”, 24”, 36”, 48”, 50-53” Analysis was conducted and final results were designed to ensure at least one Canadian manufacturer per category Fan Size Categories
9
Two Tier Rating Program Tier 1: ASABE EP566 VER10 Values 24, 36 and 48” fans ASABE EP566 VER10 values for recommended efficiency levels 18” and 20” fans The average value of all Canadian fans tested minus ½ of 1 standard deviation. 50-53” fans The value was taken as the same value for 48” fans from the ASABE EP566 as this was similar to the average value minus ½ of 1 standard deviation
10
Tier 2: Premium Efficiency VER10 Values The values determined for an Premium Efficiency VER10 rating were calculated as being 1 standard deviation above the average values for all Canadian fans tested Tier 1& 2 Air Flow Ratio (AFR) Need fan diameters to match the AFR Minimum level of 0.7 for summer ventilation fans. 0.75 or higher for smaller minimum ventilation fans. Two Tier Rating Program
12
Lower limits for tier selection
13
Sample Report
14
Qualification & Labeling Qualification Fans must be listed on the BESS Ventilation Fan Performance Test website Fans must meet the criteria as a Tier 1 or Tier 2 energy efficient product Labeling Fans are currently available with AMCA or BESS labeling, but with minimal information Proposed labeling will provide more information than existing labels
15
Existing Labeling AMCA or BESS (or none) Purchasers assurance that: The product has been tested using a recognized standard The energy efficiency ratings for the fans are accurate Note that there is no technical information
16
Proposed Efficiency Labeling Tier 1: ASABE EP566 VER10 - Energuide The Tier 1 rating system should consist of the following: Standard Energuide label Rating by diameter with a daily 24 hour kWh minimum to maximum scale (allows users to calculate annual usage) Rating by AMCA or BESS that meets or exceeds AFR and CFM/W ratings @ 0.10” w.c. s.p.
17
Proposed Efficiency Labeling
18
Tier 2: Premium Efficiency VER10 The Tier 2 rating system should consist of the following: Standard Energuide label Rating by diameter with a daily 24 hour kWh minimum to maximum scale Rating by AMCA or BESS that meets or exceeds AFR and CFM/W ratings @ 0.10” w.c. s.p. Premium efficiency label similar to the Energy Star label
19
Proposed Efficiency Labeling
20
Potential For Energy Star Introduced as a voluntary labeling program in 1992 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Designed to promote energy efficient products that reduce GHG 1996 merged with the Department of Energy Provide labeling on all major appliances in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors Must meet strict guidelines set by the EPA to earn the energy star label 3 rd party verification 2007: provided customers with total savings of $16 billion on utility bills and avoided GHG equivalent to those from 27 million cars
21
Stakeholders Piloted the concept in March 2007 with 3 manufacturers. Good buy-in; but concerns where they did not have 3 rd party testing Also surveyed utilities, Government and other parties for feedback Currently refining the standard and will resend to stakeholders for final feedback
22
Summary An agricultural fan test standard has been developed –Grouped based on fan diameter –Subdivided into fans meeting ASABE EP566 and Premium Efficiency standards –Contains at least one Canadian manufacturer per category –Designed for easy referencing –Utilities can use for programs, farms for selecting EE fans Looking to release by the end of 2008
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.