Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Case Study IV: Geometrical Modeling of the heart and the head Moritz Dannhauer.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Case Study IV: Geometrical Modeling of the heart and the head Moritz Dannhauer."— Presentation transcript:

1 Case Study IV: Geometrical Modeling of the heart and the head Moritz Dannhauer

2 Motivation Geometrical modeling for simulation Mesh

3 Content Meshing BioMesh3D new Meshing Approach: Cleaver

4 Pipeline Image Acq. & Processing Segmentation & Structure Identification Geometric Modeling & Fitting Structures Meshing Volume Modeling Simulation/Estimation Verification/Validation Discrete points e.g., sensors Boundar y conditio ns Measure d Data Visualization Seg3D BioMesh3D Shapeworks SCIRun ImageVis3D map3D SCIRun

5 Meshing CAD-based Meshing

6 CAD- based Meshing

7 Three Scenarios Low detail models High detail models Medium detail models

8 Challenges of Meshing irregular features multi-material small meshes adaptive meshrun time etc.

9 What is BioMesh3D? Tetrahedral conforming volume meshing Adaptive, multi material, subvoxel accuracy Goal: Determine accurate boundary surfaces Tetrahedralization (external): TetGen M. Meyer et. al, IEEE, 2008

10 Meshing in Biology Non-manifold Interfaces

11 Conformal Meshing Non-Conformal Mesh Conformal Mesh

12 Conformal Meshes better? Non-Conformal Mesh Conformal Mesh Still an open question!

13 Meshing packages and many more...

14 Example - Heart Oxford Rabbit Heart (BioMesh3D )

15 Cross Section of Heart BioMesh3DTarantula

16 Comparison - Run Time Time in [hours]

17 Comparison - Complexity Mesh nodes in [xMillion]

18 Comparison - Adaptivity Size variability of FE - Stddev. of Volumes in [uM^3]

19 Comparison - Element Quality scaled inscribed (I) to circumscribed ratio (C) (SICR) SICR= 3*I/C SICR Flat Regular C I

20 BioMesh3D- Pros/Cons Pro: Local refinement Single Time Point Con: Reaction/Diffusion

21 BioMesh3D - Properties Pros: + Conforming + Highly Adaptive + Preserve smooth/small features - Robustness - Usability - Run time - Sufficient node density - Element Quality Cons:

22 New meshing Approach: “Cleaver” min(SICR)>=const "Lattice Cleaving: Conforming Tetrahedral Meshes of Multimaterial Domains with Bounded Quality” Bronson, J., Levine, J., and Whitaker, R. To appear in Proceedings of the 21st International Meshing Roundtable (San Jose, CA, Oct 7 - 10, 2012)

23 Element quality Dihedral Angle Condition number

24 Comparison - Torso Cleaver Mesh Result

25 Comparison - Torso Condition number min(Dihedral Angle)

26 Comparison - Head 8 Materials

27 Comparison - Head Mesh nodes in [xMillion] Time in [hours]

28 Cleaver in Action

29 Cleaver First Release: Fall 2012 Features: Incredibly fast Conforming Guarantees on Quality Input support: SCIRun - NRRD Output supports: SCIRun pts/elems TetGen node/eles MATLAB Binaries


Download ppt "Case Study IV: Geometrical Modeling of the heart and the head Moritz Dannhauer."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google