1. Internet & Evaluation Frederic Murray Assistant Professor MLIS, University of British Columbia BA, Political Science, University of Iowa Instructional Services Librarian Al Harris Library frederic.murray@swosu.edu

2. The Internet is… a worldwide collection of computer networks ubiquitous

3. Beginnings

4. Galactic Internet

5. OneWeb, LTD.

6. Web Searching is easy because….. Speed Choice Availability 24/7 Always get an answer

7. Web searching is difficult because … Organization Quality control Reliability

9. Anatomy of a URL

10. Web Evaluation Techniques Domain name appropriate for the content ? Restricted: edu, gov, mil, a few country codes (ca) Unrestricted: com, org, net, most country codes (us, uk)

11. Domain Names Which one is right? –www.whitehouse.com www.whitehouse.com –www.whitehouse.gov www.whitehouse.gov –www.whitehouse.net www.whitehouse.net –www.whitehouse.org www.whitehouse.org Whois.net –www.whois.net www.whois.net.gov.org.mil.com.edu.net.int Useful domain for students

12. GoogleGoogle: Improve Your Searches Site Specific Command What it does: searches only specific domains What to type: children's health site:edu children's health site:gov

13. Web Evaluation Techniques Published by an entity that makes sense ? News from its source? www.nytimes.com Advice from valid agency? www.nih.gov/ www.nimh.nih.gov/

14. Remember to Evaluate!!! Authority –Who created it? Who is responsible? –What credentials do they hold? What makes them qualified to discuss the topic? Accuracy –Can the information be verified? –Check the facts! Objectivity –How is the information being presented? –Is it objective or biased? What’s the point of view? Currency (important based on subject) –When was it published? –When was it last updated?

15. Step 1: Authority Web Pages – Credentials/Qualifications/Reputation – Who is responsible for content? Is it a commercial site? Is it a government site? Is it an education site?

16. Step 1: Authority: Questions 1. Who is responsible for the content? Domain name? What does this indicate? 2.If you don't recognize the name, or there is no name, what type of information is given about the contact information? - Position? - Organizational affiliation? - E-mail address? - Biographical information?

17. Step 2: AccuracyAccuracy Web Pages –Can the information be verified? Links to credible sites Copyright Works Cited Fact check with a printed source

18. Step 2: AccuracyAccuracy 1.Does the website cite sources used to present its information? What type of sources are they? Scholarly? Popular? 2. Is it possible to verify the legitimacy of these sources? 3.If the site is research-based, does the website clearly identify the method of research and the data gathered?

19. Step 3: Objectivity Biased or Objective? Sponsoring Organization Agendas Political Propaganda Web hosting http://english.aljazeera.net/News http://www.foxnews.com/ http://www.npr.org/ Do you trust the author or organization providing the information?

20. Step 3: Objectivity Do you trust the author or organization providing the information? Determine what is the aim of the author or organization publishing the site. What is the purpose of the web site? 1. Is it advertisement for a product or service? 2. Is it for political purposes? 3. Is it trying to sway public opinion on a social issue?

21. Step 4: CurrencyCurrency Web Pages –When was it created and last updated? Well maintained web sites have an indication when it was last updated or modified Accessibility –Dead links Stability –Changes URLs frequently

22. Step 4: CurrencyCurrency 1. Is a date clearly displayed? 2. Can you determine what the date refers to? When the page was first written? When the page was first posted on the Internet? When the page was last revised or updated? The copyright date? 3. Are the resources used by the author current? 4. Does the page content demand routine or continual updating or revision? 5. Do the links on the page point to the correct Internet site addresses?

23. Remember to Evaluate!!! Authority –Who created it? Who is responsible? –What credentials do they hold? What makes them qualified to discuss the topic? Accuracy –Can the information be verified? –Check the facts! Objectivity –How is the information being presented? –Is it objective or biased? What’s the point of view? Currency (important based on subject) –When was it published? –When was it last updated?

24. Exercise: Evaluation Handoutt Institute for Historical Review http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.ihr.org/ Boston Dynamics http://www.bostondynamics.com/ http://www.bostondynamics.com/ Havidol http://havidol.com/ http://havidol.com/ Petrol Direct http://www.petroldirect.com/ Hope Science http://hopescience.com/ http://hopescience.com/ Breyer State University http://breyerstate.com/ http://breyerstate.com/

25. Google Larry Page & Sergey Brin/ Grad Students 1998 Mission: "to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.“ 2007: 23 Billion dollar corporation

26. Google Scholar Google Scholar provides a simple way to search for scholarly literature. Search across many disciplines and sources: peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, abstracts and articles, from academic publishers, professional societies, preprint repositories, universities and other scholarly organizations.

27. Google Scholar Works best for Citations Restrictions to Content –Fee-based –Often your Library already owns material –We’re working on improving access

28. Specialized Search Wolfram/Alpha –A computational knowledge engine: it generates output by doing computations from its own internal knowledge base, instead of searching the web and returning links. Scrius –For scientific information only. A web based comprehensive scientific research tool. Ipl2 –Internet Public Library (IPL) and the Librarians' Internet Index (LII). A directory.

29. Researching the Deep Web

30. www.opte.org

31. Information Literacy Web –Good for current events –Statistical Information –Pop Culture –Opinion –Information about Organizations & Groups –Need to Evaluate! Library Databases –Research Based Books & Articles –Full-text Resources –Authoritative & Peer- reviewed Materials –Information about People & Cultures –Easier to Search AND, OR, NOT Specific Subjects

32. Wikipedia Wiki: A Web application that allows users to add content to a collaborative hypertext Web resource (coauthoring), as in an Internet forum, and permits others to edit that content (open editing).

33. Wikipedia Jimmy Wales January 15, 2001 No Original Research NPOV (Neutral point of view) No owners, multiple anonymous authors Anyone with Internet access can create or edit an entry…Anyone

34. Wikipedia Contributors: male, English speaking, denizens of the Internet. Problem is not that it disregards the facts, but that it elevates them above all else. Most of the content is discussion/history of edits & not the entries themselves. Rosenzweig, Roy. “Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past.” The Journal of American History 93.1 (2006): 117-146.

35. Wikipedia Participation maps popular, not academic concerns It is a working community…but is it a good historical resource? Lack of Critical Analysis Problematic as a sole source of information Like all encyclopedias…ok to start, terrible place to stop. Benefits are to its active participants, not its readers.

36. REVIEW Search Strategies –Keywords/Boolean AND/OR/NOT Organization of Information –Catalogs Al Harris/WorldCat/Ebrary –Databases i.e. Ebsco Products –Popular vs. Scholarly Resources –Periodical Lists – Citation Searching

37. Review Critical Evaluation –Authority, Accuracy, Objectivity, Currency –Google: Site Specific Search site:edu or site:gov

38. Writing Your Paper Writing Center –Located in the basement of the library –Call for appointment #774-7083 MLA Style –Style Sheets –MLA Handbook at Reference & Circulation Desk –http://www.dianahacker.com/resdoc/http://www.dianahacker.com/resdoc/

39. Questions? Contact me: Frederic Murray 774-7113 frederic.murray@swosu.edu

40. Thanks!