Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Using Refundable Tax Credits to Help Low- income Taxpayers Tax Expenditures and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective Osgoode Hall Law School Toronto,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Using Refundable Tax Credits to Help Low- income Taxpayers Tax Expenditures and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective Osgoode Hall Law School Toronto,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Using Refundable Tax Credits to Help Low- income Taxpayers Tax Expenditures and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective Osgoode Hall Law School Toronto, Canada by Jon Forman Alfred P. Murrah Professor of Law University of Oklahoma

2 Income Inequality Gini coefficient Interdecile ratio P90/P10 Interdecile ratio P50/P10 LevelRankLevelRankLevelRank Australia0.30163.95152.0918 Canada0.32184.12172.1420 Mexico0.47308.53302.8630 Sweden0.2322.7921.721 United Kingdom0.34234.21181.9915 United States0.38275.91272.6929 OECD-300.31..4.162.09.. 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/420888675468

3 Income Inequality, cont. Interquintile share ratio (S80/S20) Interdecile ratio (P90/P10) Australia 4.84.0 Canada 5.24.1 Mexico12.18.5 Sweden 3.32.8 United Kingdom 5.44.2 United States 7.95.9 OECD-30 5.34.1 3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/421061637532

4 Inequality and Redistribution Country Gini Before Gini After Poverty Before (50% of median income) Poverty After (50% of median income) Tax %GDP Social Spending %GDP Australia0.460.328.612.430.617.1 Canada0.440.3223.112.033.316.5 Mexico n/a0.4721.018.420.67.0 Sweden0.430.2326.75.349.129.4 United Kingdom0.460.3426.38.337.121.3 United States0.460.3826.317.128.015.9 OECD0.450.3126.410.635.920.5 4

5 5 Inequality & Child Poverty in Selected Countries

6 6 Social Spending & Child Poverty in Selected Countries

7 Redistribution through Cash Transfers & Taxes Transfers to lowest quintile Taxes from lowest quintile Net transfers to lowest quintile Australia5.90.25.8 Canada3.50.62.9 Korea0.90.50.4 Sweden8.52.85.7 United Kingdom4.60.44.1 United States2.30.41.9 OECD-235.41.24.2 7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/422058728151

8 Tax-to-GDP Ratios, 2006 Country Income Taxes Payroll taxes Consumption Taxes Total Taxes Australia18.1- 8.330.6 Canada16.2 4.9 8.133.3 United Kingdom14.7 6.910.837.1 United States13.5 6.7 4.728.0 OECD Total13.0 9.111.135.9 8

9 U.S. Standard Deductions, Personal Exemptions, and Simple Income Tax Thresholds, 2009 Unmarried individuals Heads of household with one child Married couples filing joint returns with two children Standard deduction $5,700$ 8,350$11,400 Personal exemptions $3,650$ 7,300$14,600 Simple income tax threshold $9,350$15,650$26,000 9

10 Tax Rate Schedules for Various Taxpayers, 2009 10 Tax rate Rate bracket Unmarried individuals Heads of household with one child Married couples filing joint returns with two children 10$0 to $8,350$0 to $11,950$0 to $16,700 15$8,350 to $33,950$11,950 to $45,500$16,700 to $67,900 25$33,950 to $82,250$45,500 to $117,450$67,900 to $137,050 28$82,250 to $171,550$117,450 to $190,200$137,050 to $208,850 33$171,550 to $372,950$190,200 to $372,950$208,850 to $372,950 35Over $372,950

11 “Making Work Pay” Credit  New refundable credit  I.R.C. § 36A (ARRA §1001)  Will cut taxes for working families  Up to $400 ($800 if MFJ) Computed as 6.2 percent of earned income up to $400 ($800 if MFJ)  Phase out for taxpayers with modified AGI > $75,000 ($150,000 MFJ)  Claim credit on 2009 tax return  Tax withholding decrease 11

12 Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) Increase  New credit percentage for 3 or more qualifying children I.R.C. § 32 (ARRA § 2002) Temporary increase 2009 & 2010 Computed as 45% of earnings (up from 40%)  Maximum credit increase = $5,028 to $5,657  Maximum AGI increase = $43,415 to $48,279 12

13 Child Tax Credit  $1,000 per qualifying child I.R.C. § 24 (ARRA § 1003)  Temporary expansion of eligibility for refundable credit  More lower income families qualify: 2008 – threshold amount was = $8,500 2009 – threshold amount = $3,000 2010 – threshold amount = $3,000 13

14 Poverty Levels & Net Federal Tax Thresholds, 2009 Unmarried individual Single parent with 1 child Married couple with 2 children Married couple with 3 children 1. Poverty levels$10,830$14,570$22,050$25,790 2. Simple income tax threshold (before credits) $9,350$15,650$26,000$29,650 3. Income tax threshold after credits $13,391$32,317$50,233$60,550 4. Employee payroll tax threshold $0 5. Combined income and payroll tax threshold $9,336$25,667$38,592$43,743 14

15 Taxes at Poverty Level, 2009 15 Unmarried individual Single parent with 1 child Married couple with 2 children Married couple with 3 children 1. Poverty levels$10,830$14,570$22,050$25,790 2. Income tax at poverty level (after credits) -$452-$4,443-$7,695-$8,537 3. Employee Social Security & Medicare tax at poverty level $829$1,115$1,687$1,973 4. Combined income and payroll tax at poverty level $377-$3,328-$6,008-$6,564 5. Combined tax as a percent of income at poverty level 3.5%-22.8%-27.2%-25.5%

16 16

17 Outlays for the Principal Federal Benefit Programs in the United States (billions of dollars) 2008 actual2014 estimate Social Security$612$838 Medicare 385630 Medicaid 201326 Unemployment compensation 4348 Supplemental Security Income3849 Earned income tax credit 4143 Child tax credit3424 Making work pay tax creditn/a20 Food assistance 5479 Family support2524 Housing assistance <18 Retirement and disability programs for civilians, military and veterans 155 217 17

18 U.S.: Share of Household Income & Gini Index, 2005 Market incomeDisposable income Quintiles Lowest1.504.42 Second7.269.86 Middle14.0015.33 Fourth23.4123.11 Highest53.8347.28 Gini Index0.4930.418 18

19 Canada  Canada Child Tax Benefit (CCTB) C$111.66 for each child under age 18  National Child Benefit Supp. (NCBS) Up to C$173.00 per month  Child Disability Benefit (CDB) Up to C$204.58 per month  Universal Child Care Benefit (UCCB) C$1,200 per year for children under 6 19

20 Canada, cont.  Working Income Tax Benefit (WITB) refundable tax credit of 25% of earned income in excess of C$3,000 maximum of C$925 for individuals (C$1,680 for single parents and couples)  Refundable Goods and Services Tax Credit C$248 for taxpayer, spouse or partner C$130 for each child 20

21 United Kingdom  Child Benefit £20/week oldest child; £13.20 others  Child Tax Credit £545 per year/family+ £2,235/child  Working Tax Credit £1,890 per year per worker + 80% × child care, up to £175/week for 1 child; £300/week for 2+ children 21

22 Australia  Family Tax Benefit Part A: up to A$4,803.40 child under 13; A$6033.45 child 13-15; etc. Part B: extra help for low-income single parents & families with one main income  Child Care Tax Rebate  Baby Bonus $5,185, paid in 13 fortnightly installments 22

23 23

24 How an Integrated Tax & Transfer System Would Affect a Single Parent with 2 Children ($2,000 Personal Tax Credits, $2,000 per Worker Credits, and 20 & 35% Tax Rates) Pre-transfer earnings Plus personal tax credits Plus worker credit Less tax imposed After-tax income 0 $6,000 0 0 $10,000 $6,000$2,000 $16,000 $20,000 $6,000$2,000 $4,000 $24,000 $50,000 $6,000$2,000 $10,000 $48,000 $100,000 $6,000$2,000 $27,500 $80,500 $200,000 $6,000$2,000 $62,500$145,500 24

25 25

26 About the Author  Jonathan Barry Forman (“Jon”) is the Alfred P. Murrah Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law, teaching tax and pension law; the Professor in Residence at the Internal Revenue Service Office of Chief Counsel, Washington, DC, for the 2009-2010 academic year; and the author of Making America Work (Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, 2006).  Prior to entering academia, Professor Forman served in all three branches of the federal government. He has a law degree from the University of Michigan and master’s degrees in both economics and psychology.  Jon can be reached at jforman@ou.edu, 405-325-4779jforman@ou.edu  These slides at www.law.ou.edu/faculty/forman.shtmlwww.law.ou.edu/faculty/forman.shtml 26


Download ppt "Using Refundable Tax Credits to Help Low- income Taxpayers Tax Expenditures and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective Osgoode Hall Law School Toronto,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google