1. Phase 1 Preliminary Results – Survey of Publicly Available Research Ethics Resources at State and Territorial Departments of Health Michelle Conklin, B.S. 1 Jenna Mullet 1 David Perlman, Ph.D. 1,2 1 University of Pennsylvania 2 University of the Sciences, Philadelphia

2. What is Project Phobos? Phobos is one of the moons of Mars. But it also stands for: – Public health (the Ph) – Behavioral (the B) – Social (the S) Project Phobos will concentrate on research on these three areas of science and health.

3. Phases of Project Phobos PhaseDescriptionType of Project 1A preliminary analysis of publicly available information about the research ethics infrastructure and processes at State Departments of Health (DOHs). Research 2A survey of DOHs regarding their knowledge, use, and dissemination of guidance documents and processes for distinguishing public health practice from research. Research 3Educational and decision tools to be produced by Dr. Perlman's small business, E4 - Eclipse Ethics Education Enterprises, LLC and hopefully funded by small business grants and contracts from appropriate federal agencies. Research and Development 4A national, independent Institutional Review Board (IRB) for public health research and a human research protection program (HRPP) that will assist agencies and DOHs in properly distinguishing public health research and practice. Research and Development

4. Introduction Parsing public health activities into human subjects research (which requires Institutional Review Board (IRB) oversight) and practice (which does not) can be vexing (Perlman, 2008).

6. Guidance Can Help The Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) have guidance to help.

7. Much Is Unknown Much is unknown about how states and territories distinguish research from practice, including: 1.who makes the determination; 2.the extent of awareness and use of CDC and CSTE guidance; and 3.what infrastructure, policies, and procedures exist.

8. Methods Using public information, we determined how many states and territories operate an IRB and have federalwide assurances (FWAs). We also searched state and territory Departments of Health websites for mention of research versus practice information.

9. Findings StateTerritories IRBs391 Active FWA443 Inactive FWA50 Website mentions CSTE Report 40 Website mentions CDC Guidance 10 Website mentions both CSTE and CDC 40 Website mentions other information 130

10. Conclusions This data might indicate lack of awareness of this public health issue. This preliminary analysis helps to answer some of our research questions; however, conducting quantitative and qualitative surveys will help confirm these preliminary results and provide more detail.

11. Data Available Online Our results and data are publicly available at http://sites.google.com/site/projphobos.http://sites.google.com/site/projphobos

12. Questions and Contact Information David Perlman, Ph.D. Visiting Professor, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia Senior Lecturer, Penn Nursing Associate, Penn Center for Bioethics d.perlman@usp.edu 215-266-9196 Interested in collaborations and ideas on funding Phase 2 of this project