Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLindsay Green Modified over 9 years ago
1
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations TCP/RER/3402 (D) Assistance to Western Balkan Countries for Improving Compliance to International Standards on Aquatic Animal Health (Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia) Podgorica, Montenegro Hotel City 21 October 2014
2
Background to TCP: Technical Cooperation Programme 1976: FAO's specialized competence more readily available to member countries - most pressing development problems in the agriculture, fisheries and forestry sectors, and related to rural development and socio-economic issues. Limited, but identifiable and assured, resources to fulfil one of its key constitutional functions, i.e. “to furnish such technical assistance as governments may request”. Integral part of the Organization’s Regular Programme financed from the assessed budget.
3
Background to TCP: Technical Cooperation Programme In particular, TCP is the instrument, that enables FAO to respond rapidly to urgent needs for technical and emergency assistance in member countries and to contribute to their capacity building. The programme does not operate in isolation, but is closely associated with other normative and field activities of the Organization. Projects under TCP are implemented with the fullest possible involvement of beneficiaries and the maximum utilization of their personnel and resources, and recourse to the Technical Cooperation among Developing Countries (TCDC)/ Technical Cooperation among Countries in Transition (TCCT) modalities, where feasible and appropriate.
4
Criteria to TCP: developed by FAO Governing Body give emphasis to increasing production in food and agriculture, fisheries or forestry, with a view to increasing incomes of small- scale producers and rural workers; be accorded high priority by the Government, which must also ensure that the required local support facilities and services will be available and that follow-up action will be taken; be directed to an urgent and specific problem or need, limited to a particular sector or area, and involve practical action with well-defined objectives and expected results ; complement, without duplicating, other development activities, fill a critical gap and, where possible, serve as a catalyst for a larger-scale activity;
5
Criteria to TCP: developed by FAO Governing Body be limited in duration, preferably from one to three months (in no case should the overall duration of project activities exceed 24 months); be limited in cost, not exceeding the upward limit of US$400 000 per project and preferably much lower, and involve the most effective and least costly method of execution; provide assurance of the fullest possible participation of the Governments in project execution, through such means as the use of national institutions, personnel and resources.
6
Project Categories Emergencies (E) Advisory Services (A) Assistance to Development (D) Training (T) Investment (I) Formulation and Programming Missions (F) Intercountry Cooperation (C) National TCP: FAO and a Member Country Regional TCP: FAO and few Member Countries Inter-regional TCP: FAO and 2 regions TCP facility: national and regional levels
7
Background to the TCP: Technical Cooperation Programme 2006-2009 : TCP/BIH/3103 Strengthening Capacity on Aquaculture Health Management in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2008 (May): FAO Western Balkan Regional Seminar/Workshop on Aquatic Animal Health 2009: TCP Facility TCP/RER/3206: Assistance to Western Balkan Countries for Improving Compliance with International Standards on Aquatic Animal Health survey and field assessment of performance and capacity on AAH Zagreb, Croatia (Sept 2009) regional workshop to develop the proposal 2011-2012: project proposal finalization and processing 2012: approved in October 2013
8
TCP Regional Facility TCP/RER/3206 Zagreb, Croatia (Sept 2009) regional workshop to develop the proposal lengthy and consultative process identified technical areas as having the highest priority in the region to assist in developing capacity to implement international standards –risk analysis –disease surveillance, monitoring and reporting –disease diagnosis (including regional reference laboratory) –information and networking
9
TCP/RER/3402 Regional TCP Overall objectives –Strengthen regional and national aquatic biosecurity governance and capacities for dealing with transboundary aquatic animal diseases (TAADs) and in the process, improve compliance with international health standards for aquatic animals Expected outcomes: –improved aquatic animal health management and governance in the 5 West Balkan countries to reduce or minimize the risks and potential negative impacts of aquatic disease incursions.
10
TCP/RER/3402 OUTPUTS Output 1: 5 national competent authorities’ have adequate tools to implement effective biosecurity governance and aquatic animal health protection programmes Output 2: At least 20 representatives from 5 participating countries trained on various aspects of biosecurity and aquatic animal health management (e.g. diagnostics, surveillance, risk assessment, emergency preparedness) Output 3: Regional legislative review of aquatic animal health legislation completed for 5 countries
11
TCP/RER/3402 OUTPUTS Output 4: Regional disease surveillance network established and disease survey completed for 3 key pathogens/diseases Output 5: Knowledge and human capacity on various aspects of aquatic animal health enhanced and exchange of information and experience between fish health workers, policy-makers and other stakeholders enhanced Output 6: A database for documenting results of project’s outputs established allowing stakeholders access and lessons learning
12
Implementation and management arrangements Competent Authority (CA) main government institution for project implementation - the oversight or direct mandate on aquatic animal health and aquaculture management –State Veterinary Office, Bosnia and Herzegovina –Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, Veterinary Directorate (Croatia) –Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy, Veterinary Directorate (Macedonia) –Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Veterinary Administration (Montenegro) –Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, Veterinary Administration (Serbia)
13
Implementation and management arrangements Project Team: National Project Coordinators, FAO LTO (FIRA), FAO Budapest –2 International Consultants –4 TCDC consultants –6 National Consultants –4 FAO Technical backstopping officers Government contributions: (i) assistance with organizing national and regional workshops, (ii) designation of NPCs at no cost for the project and for the entire duration of the project, (iii) dedication of national staff to participate in project activities as a priority activity, and (iv) hosting of the WBAAH Website.
14
Implementation and management arrangements Regional Workshops –Serbia: National and Regional Disease Surveillance, Monitoring and Reporting Systems –BiH: Diagnosis of Disease of Fish and Molluscs –Croatia: Risk Analysis for Movements of Live Aquatic Animals/Harmonizing National Legislation with International Standards –Macedonia: National and Regional Contingency Planning and Emergency Preparedness –Montenegro: Regional Aquaculture Development and Promotion National Workshops
15
Implementation and management arrangements Project Terminal Workshop –BiH: To disseminate and share results and findings of the project and to seek methods to continue regional coordination and cooperation on initiatives begun by the project. National Workshops –To provide information and/or training to national staff and private-sector stakeholders on specific aspects of national aquatic animal health and/or aquaculture development. Precise topics to be determined by individual participating countries.
16
5th Regional Workshop: on Improving Methods for Regional Aquaculture Development and Promotion Podgorica, 20-24 October 2014 FAO Technical Cooperation Programme TCP/RER/3402 Assistance to Western Balkan Countries for Improving Compliance to International Standards on Aquatic Animal Health Objectives and expected outcomes of the Regional workshop No. 5 Dr Sanin Tanković FAO consultant
17
Objectives (i) to review the current regional directions in aquaculture development and promotion in participating countries, and (ii) to formulate regional mechanisms and action plans to promote West Balkan aquaculture products more effectively in international markets. The workshop will also present and discuss the results of FAO's Regional Legislation Review "Comparative analysis of national legal frameworks relevant for aquatic animal health of the countries of Western Balkans"
18
Process This workshop will be facilitated by: International Consultant 1 (Epidemiology) International Consultant 2 (Risk Analysis and Aquaculture Development and Promotion) International Consultant (Legislation) TCCT Consultant 1 (Aquatic Animal Health) TCCT Consultant 4 (Emergency Response and Contingency Plan), National Consultant 6 (Aquaculture Development and Promotion), FAO FIRA Senior Aquaculture Officer FAO Technical Support Services – LEGN Legal Officer FAO Lead Technical Officer for this project
19
Process Session 1: Aquaculture Development Session 2: Aquaculture Promotion Session 3: Field Visit Session 4: The Way Forward
20
Session 1: Aquaculture Development Trends in global aquaculture development (Dr Rohana P. Subasinghe, FAO) Trends in regional aquaculture development (Dr Sanin Tankovic, FAO Consultant) Country presentations: National aquaculture development: current status and future goals WG excercise 1: Formulation of an Action Plan for Aquaculture Development WG presentations (excercise 1)
21
Session 2: Aquaculture Promotion Global trends in aquaculture promotion (Dr J. Richard Arthur, FAO Consultant) Country presentations: national aquaculture promotion: status and future efforts Progess towards establishing a regional Aquatic Animal |Health Information System (Dr Nihad Fejzic, FAO Consultant) WG Session 2: Formulating an Action Plan for Aquaculture Promotion
22
Session 3: Field Visit WG presentations (excercise 2) Comparative analysis of national legal frameworks relevant for aquatic animal health of the countries of Western Balkans (Mr Mateja Đurović, FAO International Legal Consultant) Country presentations: Country experiences in meeting European Union requirements pre and post-accession (10 minutes per presentation) Croatia - post accession Serbia - pre-accession Plenary discussion on legislative issues
23
Session 4: The Way Forward Working Group Exercise 3: Plenary discussion on harmonization of aquatic animal health activities within the Western Balkan region (Dr Melba B. Reantaso) Recommendations and the Way Forward Workshop highlight summary presentation Workhsop closing
24
Participation The workshop participants will include: the National Project Coordinators (NPCs) and key personnel involved in emergency prepardness and contigency planning from the five participating countries, the FAO FIRA Technical Officer (Aquatic Animal Health/Biosecurity Management), and the FAO project consultants.
25
Participation The workshop will be participated by 5 countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina (1) Croatia (2) Macedonia (17) Montenegro (2) Serbia (2) FAO (4)
26
Products The expected outcomes of the above activities are: Action plan for regional aquaculture development and promotion Review and discussion of the FAO Regional Legislation Review Identification of needs and recommendations for future activities Report of the Workshop
27
Thank you for your attention!
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.