1. Escanaba to Hermansville Rail-Trail Forest Management Division 4-5-11

2. Content Mission West U.P. Rail-Trail System Multi-use Trails Non-Motorized Trails Trail and Recreation Economics Escanaba to Hermansville Specifics DNR Action Steps DNR Proposed Action Review of Management Alternatives Public Comment Ground Rules DNR Planning Processes Questions and Discussion

3. Mission of MDNR The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State's natural resources for current and future generations

4. Summary of West U.P. Multi-use Trails State Managed Rail-Trails in West U.P. Total of 350.5 miles of trail –Mass City to Houghton (Bill Nichols) – 38 miles –Hancock to Calumet – 14 miles –Hancock to Laurium – 15 miles –South Range to Freda (Freda Grade) – 13 miles –Chassell to MTU – 9 miles –Bergland to Sidnaw – 38 –Iron River to Marenisco – 64 –Arnheim to Chassell – 8 miles –Felch Grade – 38 miles –Escanaba to Hermansville – 25.5 miles –Baraga to Arnheim – 13 Miles –Marquette to Munising Jct – 38 miles –Iron Mountain to Norway – 12 miles –Chatham to Little Lake – 25 miles

5. Rail-Trails, Current and Future; Working to Connect Communities

6. Multi-use Trails Trail usage –Most rail-trails in U.P. are multi- use – they are open to motorized and non-motorized users –Maintenance dollars come from Snowmobile, ORV, and RIF/RTP grants

7. Non-motorized Trails Facts –MDNR manages 77 miles of State Forest Pathway in the West U.P. –MDNR manages one non-motorized rail-trail in west U.P. equaling 8 miles –Non-motorized trails are maintained with dollars from Recreation Improvement Funds (RIF) –The Recreation Passport program has been developed with a mechanism to help fund State Forest non-motorized trails

8. Recreation Trail Economics Many U.P. communities rely heavily on recreation and tourism dollars associated with rail-trails Michigan’s rail-trail network will stimulate more recreational and economic opportunities for communities Tourism/Recreation and Forestry are the two most prominent economic drivers in the U.P.

9. Escanaba to Hermansville Specifics The Corridor: –The corridor was built by Soo Line in 1901 –Was acquired from CN Railroad in 2007 with funds from Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) –Is Railbanked under State Law and by law will need to stay in its current configuration in case it needs to be reactivated for railroad use –Was purchased with goal of connecting communities and providing recreation opportunities

10. Escanaba to Hermansville Specifics: –Is 25.5 miles in length and is mostly 100’ wide –Connects with the 38 mile Felch Grade ORV route and multi-use trail –Will be managed for recreational trail use – with additional focus on preserving corridor for future rail use –The surface material is large aggregate Interconnects with Felch Grade

11. DNR Action Steps Since 2009 The DNR has: Partnered with Normenco Sportsman Club to remove trash from rail-trail – 2 days, 10 volunteers, 128 man hours, 278 tires and 7.5 tons of trash GPS’d and inspected the corridor and recorded all of the driveways, trespasses, and bridges Compiled public input from previous public input period Addressed public concerns at specific sites Developed a list of four proposed management alternatives for the corridor Elected to pursue two Directors Order’s prohibiting specific activities on the rail-trail

12. Proposed Actions Based on public comment, the DNR is proposing to: Continue to look for ways to improve the rail-trail and insure the rail-trail is an asset to the communities which it serves Create a Directors Order to restrict Full- size vehicles from using the rail-trail Create a Directors Order restricting hunting from the rail-trail

13. Management Alternatives Proposal 1: Continuous multiple use from Hermansville to Escanaba, non-motorized use from M-69 to J Road.

14. Management Alternatives Proposal 2: Multiple use from Hermansville to J Road and J Road to Escanaba; non-motorized use from M-69 to J.

15. Management Alternatives Proposal 3: Non-motorized use from Hermansville to J Road, multiple use from M-69 to Escanaba

16. Management Alternatives Proposal 4: Non-motorized use from Hermansville to J Road, multiple use from M-69 to J Road and J Road to Escanaba

17. Public Comment Ground Rules When Speaking: – Maintain professional relations and discourse with all persons – Offer constructive and insightful input – Avoid discussions of recreational supremacy. All forms of recreation and their respective groups shall be treated equally – Public comments should not be directed toward others in the crowd – Refrain from making comments about the corridor’s ownership, the Rails to Trails Act, or requesting the State sell the rail-trail back to private landowners

18. DNR Planning and Decision Making Processes Where do we go from here: –Analyze public comments –Process information and develop plan –Evaluate Trail Proposal –Finalize management plan –Pursue engineering and construction funding to finance the construction of a safe and sustainable trail –Develop management agreements with user groups –Continuously improve and maintain the rail-trail

19. Questions Thank You www.michigan.gov