Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySamuel Malone Modified over 9 years ago
1
The principle objective of a deposit insurance system 1. to contribute to the stability of a country’s financial system 2. to protect less-financially-sophisticated depositors A deposit insurance system needs to be part of well-designed financial safety net supported by: strong prudential regulation and supervision effective laws that are enforced, and sound accounting and disclosure regimes IMPORTANCE OF A DEPOSIT INSURANCE SYSTEM
2
K O S O V A Country with 2 milion inhabitant Authority of Banking and Payments of Kosova (BPK) as Authority for Bank Licensing, Supervision and Regulation 7 Commercial Banks 2 Banks comprised by foreign capital-Market share of 67 % 5 Banks comprised by mainly domestic capital – Market share of 33 % Total Deposits in Commercial Banks of 500 Milion EURO - As of 31 December 2001485 milion Euro - As of 31 December 2002 419 milion Euro - As of 30 October 2003 501 milion Euro
3
KOSOVA CASE Key points explored in analyzing the adoption of Deposit Insurance System 1. Contextual issues Advantages: high liquidity of banks international banking prudential regulation (with national features, as well) good bank supervision healthy banking system increase deposits (still high cash out of banking) Disadvantages: BPK does not have function of lender of last resort Moral hazard, incentive for excessive risks, banking system is not yet mature Average deposit account low (less monitoring of banks by depositors) No prudential deposit regulation ( need longer time)
4
2. Adoption and maintain of deposit insurance system Advantages: Bring more confidence to banks, less bank runs Good liquidity, capital and credit quality Level of enforcement Effective licensing Law level of non-performing loans Disadvantages: Low level of economic activities Privatization in process (initial phase) Risk-management policies and practices Efficiency of judicial system Ability to support early legal intervention and dealing with troubled banks
5
3. Structure and design features Advantages: Relation with supervisory authority Compulsory membership (automatic membership) No domestic currency (EURO currency used) Government funding ? Public awareness Disadvantages: Professional staff for insurance of deposits, manage risks No law on insurance Governing body – sound strategy planning, risk management processes and internal controls
6
4. Resolutions, reimbursements, claims and recoveries Resolution of the failed bank – BPK Reimbursement of insured depositors ( who will be reimbursed, limits and scope) Liquidation of bank assets Settlement of claims in accordance with applicable laws Disposition of pending or outstanding litigation Summary - IMF discouraged the establishment of Deposit Insurance System - BPK didn’t consider up to now, but, now it consider possibility of Deposit Insurance System (increase viability of banking system)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.