1. Jeffrey B. Birch, Acting Director www.fai.gov To Bid or Not To Bid: An Industry Perspective 2014, October 29 Antwanye Ford, Stuart S. Gittelman, Ph.D., Kathryn Klaus, CPCM, CFCM

2. 2 Agenda o The Contractor Perspective o The Bid Decision o Communication Pitfalls o Key Takeaways

3. The Contractor Perspective o We represent 3 companies of differing size and technical expertise Enlightened, Inc. – a small, Hub Zone, minority owned business HP Enterprise Services, LLC –a CAS-covered subsidiary of a large publicly traded IT company PDRI, a CEB company – a mid-sized human capital consulting firm, a subsidiary of a large, publicly traded company o While very different, we’ve discovered that our processes are very similar with the biggest difference being the level of formality of the process and the number of approvals required. 3

4. Industry Goals o Reputation o Growth o Solid balance sheet & Positive cash flow with profit o Contribute to Mission Outcome 4

5. 5 The Bid Decision o Qualify the Deal o Resources o Win Probability o Risk

6. Qualify the Deal - Pre-RFP Release o Are we ahead of the procurement? o Establish(ed) relationship with client o Likelihood of procurement o Agency mission aligned to capabilities o Integration with other programs o Open communications with industry o RFI’s – Free advice or a small business search? 6

7. Qualify the Deal “No-Bid Red Flags” o No RFI, draft, or industry day o Unrealistically short time to respond o Unrealistically short transition timeframes o Evaluation criteria unduly vague o Price evaluation not clearly defined 7

8. Qualify the Deal “No-Bid Red Flags” o High number of past performance requirements o High number of detailed qualifications for key personnel o Technical requirements that are too narrowly defined and seem to favor a particular brand, product, or service 8

9. Qualify the Deal o Templates and “Re-cycled RFPs” o Questions & Answers 9

10. Qualify the Deal o Terms & Conditions appropriate to the contract o Requirements align with Contract Type o Understanding of the contract vehicle 10

11. Qualify the Deal o Pricing requirements o Page limitations o Oral presentations 11

12. 12 The Bid Decision o Qualify the Deal o Resources o Win Probability o Risk

13. Resources to Bid o Bid & proposal funds o Schedule o Solution o Development of Team/Subcontractors 13

14. Resources to Deliver o Staffing o Location/travel requirements o Transition timing o Standards compliance o Investment 14

15. 15 The Bid Decision o Qualify the Deal o Resources o Win Probability o Risk

16. Can We Win This? o Is the competition fair? o Evaluation criteria (Technical and Price) o Do we have a competitive solution? o Do we have a competitive price? o Competitor Analysis o Do we understand the customer? 16

17. 17 The Bid Decision o Qualify the Deal o Resources o Win Probability o Risk

18. Risk o Company reviews and approvals are necessary to ensure compliance with bid and understanding of any assumed risk to ensure successful delivery 18

19. Risk o Delivery o Financial o Contractual 19

20. 20 Communication Pitfalls

21. o Discussions are not occurring with the vendor community either in industry forums and/or 1:1 o Draft PWS or SOW issued instead of draft RFPs 21

22. Communication Pitfalls o Evaluation criteria is written very generically and doesn’t contemplate customer objectives o Awards are often made with no discussions 22

23. Communication Pitfalls o Assumptions - Do you want them? Don’t you want them? o Debriefs and “explanations” do not contain sufficient information. 23

24. Communication Pitfalls o Some contracting officers do not communicate any procurement status. o Once we submit a bid, without any communications, we have no idea if/how we should prepare for delivery on a contract. 24

25. Key Takeaways 25 Bid & Proposal funds are limited. 1. We bid when we believe we can win. 2. We bid what we know we can deliver. 3. Communication improves the proposed solution. 4. 5. 6.6. Clearly define requirements and evaluation criteria. Set realistic timelines and expectations.