Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byStephany Stone Modified over 9 years ago
1
Graz, June 2007 The DEMETER mission: Objectives and first results M. Parrot LPCE/CNRS 3A, Avenue de la Recherche 45071 Orléans cedex 2, France E-mail: mparrot@cnrs-orleans.fr
2
Graz, June 2007 Outlines The project Case studies Statistic with the ELF/VLF electric field Statistic with the ES turbulence during seismic activities Conclusions
3
Graz, June 2007 The Project The DEMETER micro-satellite has been launched on June 29, 2004 by a Dnepr rocket from Baïkonour. The plate-form is under the CNES responsibility and the scientific payload was provided by scientific laboratories.
4
Graz, June 2007 The scientific objectives The scientific objectives of the DEMETER micro-satellite are related to the study of ionospheric perturbations in relation with the seismic and volcanic activities. These perturbations are interesting because they can be considered as short-term precursors (they occur between a few hours and a few days before a quake). The same payload will allow to survey the ionospheric perturbations in relation with man-made activities.
5
Graz, June 2007 The scientific payload The scientific payload of the DEMETER micro-satellite has several experiments: - A set of electric sensors to measure the 3 components of the electric field from DC to 3.5 MHz (CETP), - A three orthogonal search coil magnetometer to measure the magnetic field from a few Hz up to 20 kHz (LPCE), - Two Langmuir probes to measure the density and the temperature of the electrons (ESTEC), - An ion spectrometer to measure ion composition (CETP), - An energetic particle analyzer (CESR).
6
Graz, June 2007 The operations The orbit of DEMETER is polar, circular with an altitude of 710 km. DEMETER record data in two modes: a survey mode all around the Earth with low resolution, and a burst mode with high resolution above main seismic zones. The seismic parameters received from IPGP are merged with the orbital parameters in a special file of events.
7
Graz, June 2007
8
The wave experiment NEURAL NETWORK –number of whistlers and dispersion. BURST MODE –waveforms of 3 electric components up to 15 Hz, –waveforms of 6 components of the EM field up to 1.25 kHz, –waveforms of 2 components (1B + 1E) up to 20 kHz, –spectra of one electric component up to 3.5 MHz, –spectra of 2 components (1B + 1E) up to 20 kHz, –waveforms of one electric component up to 3.5 MHz (snapshots). SURVEY MODE –waveforms of 3 electric components up to 15 Hz, –spectra of 2 components (1B + 1E) up to 20 kHz, –spectra of one electric component up to 3.5 MHz.
9
Graz, June 2007
10
LPCE (IMSC, RNF, BANT) DEMETER DATA ACQUISITION ARCHIVE (Science data L0, QL, L1; Earthquake data; Ancillary data) WEB DATA SERVER (Data L0, QL, L1, L2; Earthquake events; Ancillary data products; Mission information) Science PL TM packets PL TC PLAN SCIENCE PL PROGRAMMATION GENERATION CONTROL CENTER PHYSICAL VALUES PROCESSING [L1] ANCILLARY DATA - Orbit Parameters - TM station Pass-Planning - Events (orbit, satellite) - Attitude - HK OPERATION BOARD OPERATION BOARD DEMETER MISSION GROUP (Experimenters, CNES) DEMETER MISSION GROUP (Experimenters, CNES) Science operation coordination PL and MC events Memory handling BURST zones LPCE (MC) CETP (IAP, ICE) 8 GHz SCIENTIFIC USERS SCIENTIFIC USERS Science PL TM packets « back-up » QUICK-LOOK PROCESSING [L0'] PRE-PROCESSING [L0] (Decommutation, Good Health) TM CESR (IDP) ESTEC (ISL) IPGP SEISMIC DATA Calibration validation Instrument configuration 2 GHz CNES EXCHANGE FILE SERVICE ANCILLARY DATA PROCESSING INSTRUMMENT CALIBRATIONS High resolution display [L2] PL status OPERATION COORDINATION GROUP OPERATION COORDINATION GROUP The DEMETER mission center
11
Graz, June 2007 One day in the DEMETER life (August 12, 2004) d = 2800 km
12
Graz, June 2007 Case studies
13
Graz, June 2007 Sarkar et al., JASTP, submitted, 2007. Central Iran 22 Feb. 2005 02:25:26 UT M = 6.4 d = 42.4 km Lat = 30.7°N, Long = 56.8°E The Results: DEMETER data
14
Graz, June 2007 Sarkar et al., JASTP, in press, 2007. 6 days before 4 days before2 days before
15
Graz, June 2007 Sarkar et al., JASTP, submitted, 2007. Electron Density Variation of Ion Density
16
Graz, June 2007 23 Jan. 2005 20:10:11 UT -1.22°S 119.82°E M = 6.2
17
Graz, June 2007 23 Jan. 2005 20:10:11 UT -1.22°S 119.82°E M = 6.2 2.5 days before 140 Hz
18
Graz, June 2007
20
Statistical analysis with the ELF/VLF electric field
21
Graz, June 2007 15 months of data 4385 hours of measurements Electric field data organized by - Frequencies (16) below 10 kHz - Magnetic local time (2) - Geographic positions (bin of 4° in longitude, 2° in latitude) - Kp classes (3) - Seasons (2)
22
Graz, June 2007 Electric field map
23
Graz, June 2007 Application of the central limit theoremProbability density function of the wave intensities in a bin
24
Graz, June 2007 2628 earthquakes with M > 4.8 and d < 40 km Distance between epicenter and track of the orbit < 700 km
25
Graz, June 2007 2628 Earthquakes with random position and time
26
Graz, June 2007 3346 earthquakes with M > 4.8 and d < 40 km Aftershocks have been removed and data set extended (Feb.2007) 2111 earthquakes with M > 5.0 and d < 40 km Night time
27
Graz, June 2007 random Aftershocks have been removed and data set extended (Feb.2007) 2111 earthquakes with M > 5.0 and d < 40 km Night time
28
Graz, June 2007 Statistical analysis of the electrostatic turbulence
29
Graz, June 2007 22 Nov. 2004 20:26:25 UT -46.57°S 164.83°E M = 7.3 1 day before
30
Graz, June 2007 M = 5.2 5 days before
31
Graz, June 2007 Estimation of the power law (f –α ) during a ‘Survey’ mode with ICE
32
Graz, June 2007 Examples of global maps of the slope
33
Graz, June 2007 Examples of global maps of the slope
34
Graz, June 2007 Method of superposed epochs - 4626 earthquakes of magnitude > 4.8 ; period 2004/08 – 2005/08; - Distance between the projection of the orbit on the Earth’s surface and the epicenter < 2000 km - Data selected in the time interval 3 days before the earthquakes and 1 day after the earthquakes. - Comparison between the current data during the seismic activity and the average background data at the same location during the same condition
35
Graz, June 2007 Decimal logarithm of the ratio between the current values of the power density and the ‘‘background’’
36
Graz, June 2007 EQs Random
37
Graz, June 2007 Ratio between the current values of the slope and the ‘‘background’’
38
Graz, June 2007 EQs Random
39
Graz, June 2007 Method of superposed epochs - 2173 earthquakes of magnitude > 4.8 ; period 2004/08 – 2005/12; aftershocks have been removed. - Distance between the projection of the orbit on the Earth’s surface and the epicenter < 2000 km - Data selected in the time interval 3 days before the earthquakes and 1 day after the earthquakes. - Comparison between the current data during the seismic activity and the average background data at the same location during the same condition
40
Graz, June 2007 Decimal logarithm of the ratio between the current values of the power density and the ‘‘background’’
41
Graz, June 2007 EQs Random Average change at maximum equal to 2 (10 0.8-0.52 )
42
Graz, June 2007 Average Histogram Comparison between two methods
43
Graz, June 2007 Ratio between the current values of the slope and the ‘‘background’’
44
Graz, June 2007 Random EQs Average maximum change = 18%
45
Graz, June 2007 Histogram Average Comparison between two methods
46
Graz, June 2007 Conclusions (1/3) The main points revealed by the statistical studies are: -The values of the parameters when the satellite is far from the earthquakes are similar to the values obtained when a random data set of events is used. Therefore this study shows that there is an influence of the seismic activity on the ES turbulence at an altitude of 700 km both before and after the earthquakes. -The perturbations are observed until 2 days before the earthquakes. There is a clear change right after the earthquakes. - The perturbations are real but they are weak and only statistically revealed. Up to now nothing can be said about the possibility to predict earthquakes with the analysis of the ES turbulence.
47
Graz, June 2007 Conclusions (2/3) Statistical analysis are in progress with other parameters: - Electron density and temperature - Whistler dispersion - Energetic particles - VLF Transmitters
48
Graz, June 2007 Conclusions (3/3) Operations will continue until the end of 2008. Altitude was decreased in December 2005 (660 km). The web site of the mission: http://demeter.cnrs-orleans.frhttp://demeter.cnrs-orleans.fr
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.