Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GEF Strategic Priorities Biodiversity John Hough RBEC Environment & Energy Practice Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan. 6-9 October 2004.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "GEF Strategic Priorities Biodiversity John Hough RBEC Environment & Energy Practice Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan. 6-9 October 2004."— Presentation transcript:

1 GEF Strategic Priorities Biodiversity John Hough RBEC Environment & Energy Practice Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan. 6-9 October 2004

2 Why the Strategic Priorities? GEF 4 year funding cycles GEF 4 year funding cycles Replenishment negotiations Replenishment negotiations Overall Performance Study - OPS 2 Overall Performance Study - OPS 2 End of GEF 3 (2002) End of GEF 3 (2002) More than $1 billion spent on Biodiversity More than $1 billion spent on Biodiversity Impact Unknown Impact Unknown GEF/C.21/Inf.11 Strategic Business Planning: Directions and Targets. GEF/C.21/Inf.11 Strategic Business Planning: Directions and Targets. (GEF Council. May 14-16, 2003.) (GEF Council. May 14-16, 2003.)

3 3 Not Addressing Root Causes of Biodiversity Loss 4 (a) Narrowly focused individual site- specific projects have largely failed to address root causes such as economic and social policies and lack of political will within the development agenda. Project links to social and political aspects of sustainable development have been poorly developed and mainstreamed. Project links to social and political aspects of sustainable development have been poorly developed and mainstreamed.

4 4 Weak Sectoral Linkages 4 (b) Weak links to other sectors of the economy that influence project success. The portfolio is overly structured towards individual projects with a tendency for biodiversity to be stand alone, resulting in poor mainstreaming within other sectors. The portfolio is overly structured towards individual projects with a tendency for biodiversity to be stand alone, resulting in poor mainstreaming within other sectors.

5 5 Incompatible Funding Patterns 4 (c) Funding patterns that are incompatible with the absorptive capacity of project areas or implementing or partner institutions and long term needs.

6 6 Little Project Sustainability 4 (d) Only about 10% of projects have substantially addressed sustainability. … it is difficult to establish whether or not results and institutional gains continued after project completion

7 7 Little Private Sector Involvement 4 (f) Failure to fully realize and disseminate innovative financing mechanisms and to strengthen private sector involvement in biodiversity.

8 8 Overall Strategic Approach for the Biodiversity Focal Area in FY04-06 5 (a) Place greater emphasis on sustainability of results and the potential for replication;

9 9 5 (b) Move beyond the current projects- based emphasis … to more strategic approaches that systematically targets [sic] country enabling environments to address biodiversity conservation over the long term

10 10 5 (d) Engage with the private sector more effectively

11 11 5 (g) Continue to strengthen IA’s role as brokers in the development agenda within the context of country-driven Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs), Country Assistance Strategies (CASs) and other such tools;

12 12 5 (h) Improve dissemination of tools, lessons learned and best practices among broader audiences.

13 13 6 (b) Better placing individual projects within the context of strengthening country or regional natural resource policy frameworks, management programs and financing strategies;

14 14 Four major themes run across the above priorities: (a) Capacity building (b) Participation of government agencies beyond “green” agencies (c) Enhancing and sustaining participation of local and indigenous communities and the private sector (d) Enhancing linkages with other focal areas of the GEF

15 15 1994-2002 : GEF1 and GEF 2 Operational Programmes OP1: Arid and semi-arid ecosystems OP2: Coastal, freshwater & marine ecosystems OP3: Forest ecosystems OP4: Mountain ecosystems OP13: Agro-ecosystems

16 16 Strategic Approach for GEF3 (2003-2006) Sustainability of results and potential for replication Sustainability of results and potential for replication Longer term strategic approaches to raise capacity / enabling environments Longer term strategic approaches to raise capacity / enabling environments Mainstreaming in other sectors Mainstreaming in other sectors Engaging the private sector Engaging the private sector Sustainable use and benefit sharing Sustainable use and benefit sharing Integration into the development agenda Integration into the development agenda Dissemination of tools, lessons, best practises Dissemination of tools, lessons, best practises

17 17 Biodiversity Programming GEF 3: Strategic Priorities BD1. Catalyzing the Sustainability of Protected Area Systems ($260m) BD1. Catalyzing the Sustainability of Protected Area Systems ($260m) BD2. Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Production Systems ($207m) BD2. Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Production Systems ($207m) BD3. Capacity Building for the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety ($45m) BD3. Capacity Building for the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety ($45m) BD4. Generation and Dissemination of Best Practises for addressing current and emerging issues in Biodiversity ($40m) BD4. Generation and Dissemination of Best Practises for addressing current and emerging issues in Biodiversity ($40m)

18 18 BD1. Catalyzing the Sustainability of Protected Areas ($260m) Catalyze the Catalyze the sustainable sustainable expansion, expansion, consolidation, and consolidation, and rationalization rationalization of protected area systems of protected area systems

19 19 BD1. Targets & Indicators Target (coverage) Performance Indicator > 15 countries supported x (y%) countries show improvements in management effectiveness (policy, legislation, capacity, budgets) > 400 pa’s supported, 20% new additions x (y%) PA’s supported show improved management effectiveness >70 million ha. pa’s supported x replications reported & verified >30% resources to capacity building (special attention indigenous & local communities) no. of pa’s and area on “global priority lists” (increases?)

20 20 BD1: Sustainability of Protected Area Systems Examples: Demonstration and implementation of innovative financial mechanisms Demonstration and implementation of innovative financial mechanisms Legal, policy & regulatory changes Legal, policy & regulatory changes Institutional development Institutional development Community-indigenous initiatives Community-indigenous initiatives Removing barriers to public-private partnerships Removing barriers to public-private partnerships

21 21 BD2. Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Production Systems ($207m) Facilitate the mainstreaming of biodiversity within production systems (systemic and institutional capacities) Facilitate the mainstreaming of biodiversity within production systems (systemic and institutional capacities) Developing market incentive measures Developing market incentive measures Demonstration (not replication) Demonstration (not replication)

22 22 Increasing focus on barriers Increasing focus on production system/sector-wide barriers as opposed to site based threats Increasing focus on production system/sector-wide barriers as opposed to site based threats Consider what are the barriers that prevent sustainable use/maintenance of biodiversity in production landscapes or sectors? Consider what are the barriers that prevent sustainable use/maintenance of biodiversity in production landscapes or sectors? Increased focus on systemic and institutional capacity Increased focus on systemic and institutional capacity

23 23 Sector vs Site BD2 allows us to focus on a select number of root causes to biodiversity loss and hence we can have projects focusing just on one sector without securing specific site biodiversity benefits BD2 allows us to focus on a select number of root causes to biodiversity loss and hence we can have projects focusing just on one sector without securing specific site biodiversity benefits Focus on landscape (spatial) or sector / industry / business Focus on landscape (spatial) or sector / industry / business Engagement of key sectors: NRM based (Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries), others (Tourism, Infrastructure, Oil, Gas etc.) Engagement of key sectors: NRM based (Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries), others (Tourism, Infrastructure, Oil, Gas etc.) Partnerships with range of actors: government, industry, SMEs, local communities etc. Partnerships with range of actors: government, industry, SMEs, local communities etc. Enabling environment (legislation, policy, barrier removal, institutional structures). Enabling environment (legislation, policy, barrier removal, institutional structures). Focus on production, supply chain reform and markets, whilst retaining linkages to habitats. Focus on production, supply chain reform and markets, whilst retaining linkages to habitats. Demonstration value Demonstration value

24 24 Engagement with Business Partner with production businesses directly to build their capacity to change production systems/ service delivery Partner with production businesses directly to build their capacity to change production systems/ service delivery Partner with large companies who purchase significant shares of global production to influence supply and production systems Partner with large companies who purchase significant shares of global production to influence supply and production systems Partner with financial institutions to influence lending to specific types of businesses Partner with financial institutions to influence lending to specific types of businesses Develop market incentives (certification) to motivate changes in the market place and production Develop market incentives (certification) to motivate changes in the market place and production A “business” can be a single family farm A “business” can be a single family farm Business is the bottom line Business is the bottom line

25 25 BD2. Targets & Indicators Target (coverage) Performance Indicator > 5 projects in each production sector (forestry, fisheries, agriculture, tourism) x (y%) projects have incorporated bd aspects into policies & plans, regulations, & implemented these > 20 million ha in production landscapes or seascapes contribute to bd conservation or sust. use x ha of production systems contribute to bd cons or sust use > 5 countries promote cons & sust. use of wild species & land races as a contribution to food security x people (y% total beneficiaries) show improved livelihoods x replications reported & verified of applying incentive measures & instruments beyond project boundaries x% projects mainstream bd into IA work

26 26 Some examples of BD2 projects Bulgaria: Rhodope Mountains Bulgaria: Rhodope Mountains –Mainstreaming BD across multiple use landscape, working with agriculture, forestry, tourism, water management etc. Promoting forest certification, organic farming, ecotourism. Increasing sectoral coordination at national level, promoting private sector involvement. Mongolia: Altai-Sayan Mongolia: Altai-Sayan –Pastoralism forms mainstay of economy (about 70% of GDP). Project advances the integration of BD in sector policies and land-use planning at national, provincial and district levels. Works with local herder communities at local level to improve herd management and mobility with ecosystem benefits.

27 27 Some examples of BD2 projects Middle East/Africa: Soaring Birds Middle East/Africa: Soaring Birds –Focus on threats to soaring birds across a flyway, especially at “bottleneck sites” and efforts to make production activities “bird-friendly” by influencing development activities, especially siting of infrastructure, as well as agriculture, water, tourism etc. West Africa: Endemic Livestock West Africa: Endemic Livestock –Endemic ruminant livestock embodies resistance to trypanosomosis, resilience and hardiness. Agricultural policies favour crop production over livestock resulting in loss of natural habitat, and favour exogenous over indigenous breeds. Project addresses barriers including policies, subsidies, poorly developed markets, and limited knowledge.

28 28 Private Sector Projects Certified Niche Shade Coffee (LAC) Certified Niche Shade Coffee (LAC) Mainstream Shade Cocoa (Ghana) Mainstream Shade Cocoa (Ghana) Forest certification – tropical (Vietnam) and temperate (Lithuania) Forest certification – tropical (Vietnam) and temperate (Lithuania) Responsible Tourism (Chile, Malaysia) Responsible Tourism (Chile, Malaysia) Ecotourism (Nepal) Ecotourism (Nepal) Organic agricultural products (Croatia) Organic agricultural products (Croatia)

29 29 BD3. Capacity Building for the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety ($45m) Development of systemic and institutional capacities for Biosafety Development of systemic and institutional capacities for Biosafety

30 30 BD3. Targets & Indicators Target (coverage) Performance Indicator All signatories or interested parties to protocol have base level capacity building x countries enacted domestic legislation / regulations re. protocol All parties to protocol have advanced capacity building for implementation x countries have institutional arrangements at local levels for protocol % of countries with draft biosafety frameworks and started implementation

31 31 BD4. Generation and Dissemination of Best Practises for addressing current and emerging issues in Biodiversity ($40m) Improve analysis, synthesis and dissemination Improve analysis, synthesis and dissemination Scientific and technical cooperation – knowledge networks Scientific and technical cooperation – knowledge networks Demonstration projects generating synergies between focal areas Demonstration projects generating synergies between focal areas –Vulnerability and adaptation to global change –Ecosystem approaches Identified themes Identified themes

32 32 BD4. Targets & Indicators Targets (coverage) Performance Indicators Improved compilation and dissemination of best practice on specific themes > 3 demonstration projects between bd and other focal areas demonstrating “win-win” solutions (eg. adaptation, rangeland rehabilitation, transboundary contamination) Successful demonstrations with quantitative gains (eg. ha. land with improved carbon sequestration potential)


Download ppt "GEF Strategic Priorities Biodiversity John Hough RBEC Environment & Energy Practice Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan. 6-9 October 2004."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google