1. Special TA Office Hours (April 5 th -7 th ) Jason Hildebrandt Jason Hildebrandt  Monday 1:00-2:00  Wednesday 1:00-2:00 Laszlo Sarkany Laszlo Sarkany  Monday 10:00-12:00  Monday 1:00-3:00 Nadir Budhwani Nadir Budhwani  TBA Esmorie Miller Esmorie Miller  Tuesday 11:00-12:00  Wednesday 11:00-12:00 Matt O’Rourke Matt O’Rourke  Tuesday 10:00-11:00  Tuesday 1:00-2:00 Korhan Yazgan Korhan Yazgan  Monday 1:00-2:00  Wednesday 1:00-2:00 Nikki Petruniak Nikki Petruniak  Tuesday, 10:00-11:00  Tuesday 1:00-2:00 Herb Shields Herb Shields  Tuesday 1:00-3:00  Wednesday 1:00-3:00

2. Electoral Systems (Cont’d) Ensuring Representation, Ensuring Stability March 30 th, 2004

3. Alternative Systems: Proportional Representation representation (# of seats) directly proportional to share of popular vote received (# of votes)

4. Hypothetical Results Under Different Electoral Systems - 2000 Election % VoteSeats: SMPS Seats: PR Liberal CA BQ NDP PC

5. Hypothetical Results Under Different Electoral Systems - 2000 Election % VoteSeats: SMPS Seats: PR Liberal40.8%172 (57%) CA25.5%66 (22%) BQ10.7%38 (12.6%) NDP8.5%13 (4.3%) PC12.2%12 (4%)

6. Hypothetical Results Under Different Electoral Systems - 2000 Election % VoteSeats: SMPS Seats: PR Liberal40.8%172 (57%)127 CA25.5%66 (22%)77 BQ10.7%38 (12.6%)30 NDP8.5%13 (4.3%)27 PC12.2%12 (4%)37

7. LiberalCanadian Alliance Progressive Conservative Bloc Quebecois New Democrats 2000PR2000PR2000PR2000PR2000PR Atlan tic 1913039110045 QB36340514383001 ON100532250150019 MB/ SK 781411130067 AB/ BC 7165033150025 CD A 1721276677123738301327

8. Electoral Systems & Democracy SMPS  exaggerates political dominance of largest group of voters to emphasize leadership, stability and accountability do all models of democracy value bold leadership equally??  creates false majority rule  concern with rights of minorities?  concern with representation? proportional representation  more competition and choice  better representation of various interests  more effective and meaningful political participation  higher level of consensus required for government to act

10. Political Parties Interest Aggregation Interest Representation March 30 th, 2004

11. Political Parties vs. Interest Groups interest groups strive to influence political outcomes political parties strive to become the governing party both represent political interests  political parties also aggregate interests  in doing so, political parties act to filter interests

12. Type of Political Parties basis of organization  electoral-professional parties vs. mass parties basis of electoral competition  pragmatic parties (brokerage parties)  ideological-programmatic parties  interest parties  http://www.guinnessvote.ca/register.html http://www.guinnessvote.ca/register.html

13. Ideological/Programmatic Parties organized around social cleavages  class  religion  ethnicity  region traditional conceptions of ideology  left vs. right

14. The Ideological Spectrum The Left -- Socialist The Right -- Conservative government regulation of the economygovernment regulation of the economy policies to help disadvantaged groupspolicies to help disadvantaged groups policies to redistribute incomepolicies to redistribute income greater reliance on the marketgreater reliance on the market fewer government regulationsfewer government regulations no special treatment for special interest groupsno special treatment for special interest groups lower taxeslower taxes More Gov’t Less Gov’t

15. General Trends -- Political Parties the rise of pragmatism  increasingly parties try to compete for the middle ground  differences between parties fading

16. The Ideological Spectrum The Rise of Pragmatism The Left -- Socialist The Right -- Conservative Tony Blair (Britain) New Labour Bill Clinton (US) New Democrats George W. Bush (US) Compassionate Conservatism

17. General Trends -- Political Parties single member plurality systems encourage pragmatic parties; PR promotes ideological/interest parties the rise of pragmatism  parties increasingly competing to occupy the centre of the political spectrum  reasons?  success of pragmatic parties has been self-reinforcing  the fall of communism  affluence of western industrialized societies

18. Political Parties & Democracy mass parties vs. electoral- professional parties  mass parties encourage greater participation in politics by the public  majoritarian democrats  electoral-professional parties  parties perform minimalist function of structuring elections  elite democrats

19. Political Parties & Democracy ideological/interest parties vs. pragmatic parties  ideological/interest parties  gives clear electoral choices help make elections meaningful encourages greater mass participation  majoritarian democrats  pragmatic parties  depend on party elites (to broker deals among various interests)  elections differences between parties are limited electoral choice is really about best management team  elite democrats

20. Political Parties & Democracy liberal democrats  crucial point is that individuals remain free to form political parties (and contest elections) free from state interference

22. Interest Groups Interest Representation

23. Interest Groups organizations whose members act together to influence gov’t policy on specific issues, without contesting elections (different from parties!)  how do they influence -- lobbying play an important role in representing citizen demands to gov’t

24. Determinants of Interest Group Influence: size (membership) and cohesion information, expertise leadership, level of organization financial resources high-status (celebrity) membership values, goals, tactics, issue -- compatible with broader public opinion?  ability to sway public opinion

25. Determinants of Influence - - Institutionalization institutionalization -- degree to which a group has become an acknowledged actor in/part of the political process levels of institutionalization institutional/associational/anomic danger for group -- co-optation to become institutionalized, interest groups must adopt norms and behaviours inside the broader governing consensus must be more concerned with preserving priveleged position in the long-term than winning on certain issues danger for government – capture government relies on group to the point that it loses it ability to act autonomously in that issue area

26. What Interest Groups Do -- Lobbying tactics  quiet consultations  lobbying elected officials  lobbying bureaucratic officials  mobilizing public opinion  media campaigns  public demonstrations the paradox of interest group influence  the most powerful interest groups are often the most quiet!

27. Interest Groups and Democracy majoritarian democratic critique of interest group pluralism  interest group politics is grossly uneven  well-financed, privileged interests hold the advantage  the paradox of interest group influence  the strongest interest groups (e.g. economic interests) do not have to lobby in order to have influence  interest group influence displaces the influence of the general public  special interest groups

28. Interest Groups and Democracy elite democracy  interest group competition and lobbying (even if grossly uneven) is fine so long as...  political elites retain the power to make overall decisions in the general welfare the summation of all interest group demands does not equal the general welfare

29. Interest Groups and Democracy liberal democracy  pluralism  as long as individuals are free to form interest groups, interest group competition represents interests in society  groups do not have to be equal; groups have to have equal opportunity to compete