1. Some Ideas for Network Consolidation GTRA Conference June 24 th, 2012 Bedford Springs

2. 2 Department A Department B Department C Department D This has been GoC bandwidth procurement strategy for the last 20 years Only 2 - sometimes 3 providers can bid Almost all contracts national by department Telco assets more regionally based Legacy Approach to Bandwidth Procurement

3. 3 PWGSC Data Ctr. MPLS Peering Limited Competition and Bargaining Power

4. 4 More players – but one shared multi-service IP network National Backbone provides a high speed redundant backbone that interconnects to all service provider networks Regional price reductions estimates between 30 – 40% More competition Better alignment with GC policy Less departmental procurement disruption Enter – The Third Option

5. 5 Started in the National Capital Region 40-50% of the GoC populaiton Highest density Most data centres Quickest win opportunity Organic Opportunity-Based Growth

6. Service Objective: To provide the most competitive shared WAN Service in the GC Service Components: Acquire Fibre Equipment – NESS People – SM&D Service Definition: Shared (virtualized) WAN in Ottawa Area Schedule Milestones: Contract Award – September 2007 PoC / Beta Phase (September 2007 – September 2008 Service Announcement Date – October 2008 In service: 44 Months Background

7. Item / DescriptionLegacySMS Current Total Number of Sites in NCR22 Sites w/ 10Mb connections150 Sites w/ 100Mb connections715 Sites w/ 1000Mb connections07 Monthly Costs$95K$65K Sample Client Competitive Case

8. Current Service Status (44/ mths. from Service Announcement Date) Monthly Run Rate: $1M Service Availability: 99.999% - service has not been interrupted since it was installed (one dark-fibre cut on a remote site over 2 years) Are 4 data centers are dependent on it: PenMod, PayMod etc.. Average fulfillment period per site: 25 days On average 10 – 100x more bandwidth for the same cost as outsourced services in the NCA Current number of sites connected: 130 Current number of clients: 20 Big clients missing: DND 60 sites, CRA 25+sites, HRSDC 22 sites. Limitations: NCA only Service Metrics

9. Local Area Network – As Is Dept. A Dept. B Dept. C Dept. D Dept. n Many multi-tenant buildings Redundant LAN infrastructures VRF – VLAN mapping Shared LAN Infrastructure Voice / Video and Data virtualization Price per port LAN model LAN Service Levels standards National Shared MPLS Network

10. Internet DCN-A1 (Data) DCN-A2 (Internet) DCN-A3 (Storage) Department A WAN A Each Department has three Data Centre Networks : One connects to the departmental WAN One connects to SCNet (Internet Access) One is dedicated for Storage connectivity Current State Architecture SCNet

11. Internet DCN (Data, Storage & Internet) Department A WAN A Step 1 in DC Consolidation - Consolidate & virtualize the DC Network – Each DCN that is consolidated with Save $$ Annual Savings Estimates: Consolidate DCNs within Each Department SCNet

12. Internet Department A WAN A Firewalls IDS/IPS Load Balancers SRA Services WiLAN Termination Encryption Services Etc.. Consolidate DCNs – Auxiliary Services SCNet DCN (Data, Storage & Internet)

13. Internet DCN-A1 (Data) DCN-A2 (Internet) DCN-A3 (Storage) Department A WAN A DCN-B1 (Data) DCN-B2 (Internet) DCN-B3 (Storage) Department B WAN B DCN-C1 (Data) DCN-C2 (Internet) DCN-A3 (Storage) Department C WAN C DCN-D1 (Data) DCN-D2 (Internet) DCN-D3 (Storage) Department D WAN D Multi-tenant Data Centres Current State Architecture SCNet

14. Internet Shared Consolidated Data Center Network Multi-tenant Data Centres – To Be GCNet One Data Centre Network per Data Center/ All departments Integrated Storage and Server Networks Integrated Firewalls / Load Balancing Virtualized / Logically separate / Security Zones & Domains Intra Data Centre Network Architecture – To Be Department A Department BDepartment CDepartment DDepartment EDepartment n

15. Mezo-plan 5 ITSM Micro-plans ITSM Stream 1 Stream 2 Stream 3 12345 12345 12345 Planning & Governance Mezo Plan Level: GC-Wide ITSM Plan PMO Assigned Stream Level: A Series of Related Initiatives Broken down into small Micro Initiatives (MIs) Stream length 4-6 quarters One MI per quarter per stream PM per Stream Quarterly governance/alignment review Micro Initiative (MI) Level: Agile initiative Portfolio of initiatives that are small and transformational Under $4M in value Must be able to complete in 3 month rolling window PMP refers to this as “Rollling Wave” X-Function (plan/build/operate/user teams) Opportunity-based MACROPLAN Feedback Learning Metrics Change & Risk Mgmt. WBS Etc.

16. Mezo-plan 2Mezo-plan 1Mezo-plan 3Mezo-plan 4 Facilities Mainframe PlatformStorage M A C R O P L A N High level 8 Year View Indicative Business Case Highlights Focus Areas Micro-plans FacilitiesMicro-plans - MFMicro-plans PlatformMicro-plans Storage Stream 1 Stream 2 Stream 3 12345 12345 12345 Stream 1 Stream 2 Stream 3 12345 12345 12345 Stream 1 Stream 2 Stream 3 12345 12345 12345 Stream 1 Stream 2 Stream 3 12345 12345 12345 Planning, Governance & Alignment TB Sub Policy & Standards

17. Start with a competitive analysis Build an assumptive business case Validate the business case and service model via production beta implementations When the assumptions have been validated to to larger volume deployment Lessons Learned One Network