1. Speaker: Takeshi SUZUKI Port Security Inspector, General Affairs Division, Ports and Harbors Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure Transport and Tourism (MLIT) Economy: JAPAN Progress Report on ASEAN - Japan Maritime Transport Security Program

2. 2 Country C Factory Check PFSO Check SSO Check PFSO Country B Country F Country E Country A The weak points of SOLAS/ISPS Where no external audit scheme exists for security measures, and unless every country implements and maintains effective security measures at their ports and on their ships, our trade network will not remain secure. Necessity of cooperation Urge and assist every Contracting Government to implement SOLAS/ISPS effectively and continuously by establishing a PDCA cycle in each country. Why international cooperation is important? Country D Background Trade partners may be in danger if one port does not implement effective security measures

3. 3 Date: January 12-13, 2006 Place: Tokyo Sponsor: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan Attending countries(15) and organizations(3): Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Russian Federation, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States of America, EC, ICAO, IMO, WCO Approximate number of attendance: 220 (50 from Japan and 170 from other countries) Ministerial Conference on International Transport Security http://www.mlit.go.jp/sogoseisaku/kokusai_e/minister_e.html

4. 4 Resolve to continue, in cooperation with IMO and other appropriate fora, to provide necessary assistance and support to Contracting Governments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention in enhancing their ability and capacity to implement appropriate security measures at their port facilities through further international and regional efforts Ministerial Conference on International Transport Security Ministerial Statement Ministerial Statement on Security in International Maritime Transport Sector

5. 5 Capacity Building efforts and initiatives on Maritime Security Strong but difficult and time-consuming in establishing universal framework. Quick but need lots of resources. Possible overlaps with other donors. - If facing common issues, can learn from each other & streamline efforts. Global approach Bilateral approach Regional approach approaches to assist Capacity Building efforts Japan’s regional approach through ASEAN/Japan & APEC Further efforts on capacity building are required. However, overlaps or even conflicts between various bilateral & regional efforts need to be minimized. Also such efforts should be coordinated and appropriately targeted. Further efforts on capacity building are required. However, overlaps or even conflicts between various bilateral & regional efforts need to be minimized. Also such efforts should be coordinated and appropriately targeted.

6. 6 ASEAN-Japan Transport Partnership Projects Currently, 21 projects are in progress, and among them, 7 projects are maritime & port projects AJMT-1 ASEAN-Japan Seafarers Policy Cooperation AJMT-2 ASEAN-Japan Maritime Transport Security Program AJMT-3 ASEAN-Japan Cruise Promotion Project AJMT-4 ASEAN-Japan High-Speed Maritime Network AJMT-5 ASEAN “Mega-Float” Promotion Project AJMT-6 ASEAN-Japan Port Technology Joint Research Project AJMT-7 ASEAN-Japan Cooperation on Coast Guard Development

7. ASEAN/Japan Maritime Transport Security Program (AJMT-2) 7 A/J 1 st Seminar on Maritime Security and Combating Piracy (2003.12) A/J 2 nd Seminar on Maritime Security and Combating Piracy (2005.3) 2004.7- SOLAS/ISPS entered into force Seminar in Indonesia (2004.3) A/J WS in Philippines (2004.4) A/J Seminar in Myanmar (2004.5) A/J WS in Vietnam (2004.6) 2005.10 JICA Training Course on Port Facility Security A/J Seminar/WS in Thailand (2005.7) A/J Seminar in Cambodia (2006.4) WS in Myanmar (2005.11) JICA/APEC Seminar in Indonesia (2005.12) APEC WS in Vietnam (2005.12) 1st stage: How to comply with SOLAS 2 nd stage: How effectively & continuously implement SOLAS 2007.2 A/J Regional Action Plan on Port Security (RAPPS) Accepted A/J Seminar in Cambodia (2004.5) APEC Seminar in Malaysia (2006.6) 1st PSEM in Bangkok (2006.4) 2nd PSEM in Yokohama (2006.10) A/J JE (2007.2) 3rd PSEM in Jakarta (2007.3) 4th PSEM in Fukuoka (2007.9) A/J JE (2008.1, 2008.11) 5th PSEM in Kuala Lumpur (2008.3) 6 th PSEM in Nagoya (2009.2 proposed) 2005.10 A/J Port Security Policy Dialogue 3 rd stage: How to check & upgrade security measures “manuals on port security measures”“Joint Exercise (JE)” A/J Port Security Experts Meeting (PSEM)’ Development of “manuals on port security measures” and implementation of “Joint Exercise (JE)” through discussion in ‘A/J Port Security Experts Meeting (PSEM)’

8. 8 20062007200820092010 4-67-910-121-34-67-910-121-67-121-67-121-6 A/J Maritime Transport Security Program A/J Port Security Experts Meeting Each ASEAN Country A/J Transport Policy WS Jun, Miyazaki Submit A/J STOM & ATM Feb, Bangkok Submit PLAN, DO CHECK ACTION Individual Action Plan IAP ＋ Collective Actions Preparation for RAPPS 1) Discuss draft PFSA & PFSP manuals 2) Discuss Technical Guideline 3) Discuss scenarios for JCE Joint Exercise Training course on Port Security Oct, 07 Yokohama Training course on Port Security Sep, 08 Training course on Port Security Oct, 09 1) Finalize PFSA & PFSP 2) Finalize Technical Guideline 3) Follow up JCE 1) Discuss DOS manual 2) Discuss Best Practice 1) Finalize DOS manual 2) Finalize Best Practice Book 3) Follow up JE 4) Revise RAPPS 1) Discuss Audit Program on Port Security 2) Follow up JE 1) Finalize Audit Program on port security 2) Follow up JE Accept Time limit to submit PFSP info to IMO Jul 09 PSEM1PSEM2PSEM3PSEM4PSEM6PSEM7 Joint Exercise A/J Maritime Transport WG Vietnam PSEM5 Roadmap for ASEAN-Japan RAPPS

9. Current Programs ASEAN/Japan Maritime Security Joint ExerciseASEAN/Japan Maritime Security Joint Exercise JICA Training Course on Port Facility SecurityJICA Training Course on Port Facility Security 9

10. 10 The 6 th ASEAN/Japan Maritime Security Joint Exercise (JE6) Date: November 5, 2008 Place: Hai Phong port, Vietnam Organizers: MLIT (Japan) and VINAMARINE Participated countries & ports: 19 ports from 10 countries as shown in the next slide Aim: to enhance the port security of participation countries through efficient exchange and sharing of maritime security related information. Date: November 5, 2008 Place: Hai Phong port, Vietnam Organizers: MLIT (Japan) and VINAMARINE Participated countries & ports: 19 ports from 10 countries as shown in the next slide Aim: to enhance the port security of participation countries through efficient exchange and sharing of maritime security related information. Scenario: International terrorist organization planted bombs in container cargos targeting Japan and ASEAN countries, and several incidents occur in Hai Phong port. Overall Exercise Controller (OEC) provide information on the case to the participating countries. Each country’s official gives information to the participating ports and relevant organizations. Each port make necessary actions based on their PFSP, and share information with other participants such as change in Maritime Security Level. Scenario: International terrorist organization planted bombs in container cargos targeting Japan and ASEAN countries, and several incidents occur in Hai Phong port. Overall Exercise Controller (OEC) provide information on the case to the participating countries. Each country’s official gives information to the participating ports and relevant organizations. Each port make necessary actions based on their PFSP, and share information with other participants such as change in Maritime Security Level. Overview DOS was exchanged among ports and vessel with higher security level. Information on finding WMD (weapons of mass destruction) and suspicious ships was exchanged smoothly. Several countries changed security level or strengthened security, and informed other countries. DOS was exchanged among ports and vessel with higher security level. Information on finding WMD (weapons of mass destruction) and suspicious ships was exchanged smoothly. Several countries changed security level or strengthened security, and informed other countries. Result Largely succeeded in the exercise aim. Contents requiring real-time judgment should be increased from the next exercise. Largely succeeded in the exercise aim. Contents requiring real-time judgment should be increased from the next exercise. Evaluation

11. 11 Exercise area Participating 19 ports from 10 countries Yokkaichi Nagoya Manila Yangon Hai Phong Laem Chabang Bangkok Sihanoukville Kota Kinabalu Singapore Tanjung Priok Kuching Sibu Miri Tawau Muara Labuan Sandakan Lahad Datu

12. 12 Scenes from the Joint Exercise Exercise ControllingField exercise Evaluation meetingDOS exchange

13. 13 JICA Training Course on Port Facility Security Invited Countries Mainly ASEAN Mainly ASEANCurriculum (1) Basic knowledge (1) Basic knowledge Basic knowledge on ISPS, security regime and initiative under IMO and major countries including Japan, security threat and terrorist activity. (2) Table-top exercise (2) Table-top exercise Table-top exercise by role-playing the key players on port security. Table-top exercise by role-playing the key players on port security. (The latest course used the APEC Drills and Exercise Manual) (The latest course used the APEC Drills and Exercise Manual) (3) Site visit (3) Site visit Site visit to various types of port facilities for example at Yokohama and Nagoya ports. Site visit to various types of port facilities for example at Yokohama and Nagoya ports. (4) Application (4) Application Interactive exercises on PFSA, PFSP and Audits. Interactive exercises on PFSA, PFSP and Audits.

14. Future plan Being aware of the importance of further regional cooperation for capacity building, Japan will continue to make efforts for enhancing maritime security in this region in cooperation with the other relevant countries. 14