Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDeborah Bennett Modified over 9 years ago
1
Luis del Río North Dakota State University Developing a Sclerotinia stem rot warning system for canola in North Dakota
3
Photo: www.canolacouncil.org
4
North Dakota canola producing areas DivideBurke RenvilleRoletteTowner Cavalier Mountrail Williams Ward McHenry Pierce Benson Ramsey WellsFoster Eddy Stutsman Griggs McLean Bottineau Rosseau Kittson Marshall Pennington Warren Red Lake Sheridan Nelson Fargo
5
Sclerotinia stem rot disease cycle (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) A. Lamey
6
Model development 206 fields from 25 locations per year SSR incidence on 50 plants per field Annual field survey (third wk August) Disease data collection SSR mean incidence per location/ year
7
NDAWN stations Hourly data on air and soil temp, solar radiation, dew temp, wind speed, etc. Means and new variables created by periods of 15 days Weather data collection Model development
8
Logistic regression analysis Model produced using 177 data points collected between 2001 and 2006 Model validation using cross-validation option of SAS Model development and validation Model development
9
Risk of SSR development calculated every 3 days Color maps available to growers through web site during canola flowering period Model forecasting Model development
10
Incidence of Sclerotinia stem rot of canola in North Dakota between 1995 and 2008 Incidence (%) Years Results
11
Most important weather variables were precipitation and solar radiation Three models developed, one for second half of June, one for first half of July and a general model Results
12
Percent concordance77 80 83 Percent discordance23 20 17 Somers’ D 0.54 0.59 0.66 Gamma 0.54 0.59 0.66 ParametersModel 1 Model 2 Model 3 Tau- a 0.27 0.30 0.33 c 0.77 0.79 0.83 Results y= 4.08+0.05(rain3)+0.07(rain4)-0.55(solar4)+0.53(rain5) -0.20(solar5)+0.38(rain6)
13
Results
14
Risk estimation North Dakota, 2007 Flowering period Low risk Intermediate risk High risk July 21 July 18 July 15 July 12 July 9 July 6 July 3 June 30 June 27 June 24 Cavalier Towner Rolette 3% 8%4%Mean incidence Results
15
Ward Benson Rosseau Bottineau Benson Towner Cavalier Rollette 33 44 0 100 44 53 76 100 2 1 0 25 7 3 4 8 Prevalence (%)Incidence (%) County SSR county prevalence and incidence, ND 2007Results
16
Cavalier Ramsey Roseau Benson Bottineau Rolla Towner Ward 68 78 100 80 7 100 28 5 4 14 2 1 7 1 Prevalence (%) Incidence (%) County (%) SSR county prevalence and incidence in 2008 47 9 5 15 9 18 20 Fields Results
17
Ward Benson Bottineau Towner Cavalier 13 25 50 60 47 1 2 1 2 3 Prevalence (%)Incidence (%) County SSR county prevalence and incidence, ND 2009Results
18
SSR Prevalence (%) Number of high-risk warnings Association between number of high-risk warnings and SSR prevalence Results
19
Summary Empirical model developed using weather data Overall accuracy of model is approximately 75% Prevalence of high risk warnings associated with higher SSR prevalence
20
Model improvement is needed Areas were collaboration is sought: - Modeling leaf wetness duration - Use of Doppler radar data - Quantification of risk of apothecia formation Summary
21
Acknowledgements Curt Doetkott, ITS NDSU scouts and county agents USDA-ARS/Sclerotinia Initiative North Dakota Canola Growers Association
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.