Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy, Noreyda Casañas, Daniel Gangeri Curriculum Support.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy, Noreyda Casañas, Daniel Gangeri Curriculum Support."— Presentation transcript:

1 Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy, Noreyda Casañas, Daniel Gangeri Curriculum Support Specialists DATA ANALYSIS GRADE K-5 Elementary Science Liaisons and Coaches iCAD Session 1 (Sept 2014)

2 Data can… provide feedback on the past and provide a basis to begin planning for the future What Kind of Information can Data Provide us? Department of Mathematics and Science

3 IMPORTANCE OF DATA Facilitate a clear understanding of the gaps between where the school or class is and where it wants to be. Show if school or class goals and objectives are being accomplished. Predict and prevent failures. Predict and ensure successes. Establish foundation for Continuous School Improvement/SIP. Data drives instruction, and professional development. Department of Mathematics and Science

4 Effective Use of Classroom Data Teaching Using Results Planning Student Learning Assessing Source: Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit

5 GRADE K-5 BASELINE AND PRETEST ASSESSMENT RESULTS (2014-2015) DATA DISAGGREGATION Department of Mathematics and Science

6 Science Pretest Results K-5 (MDCPS 2013-2014) GRADEStudents Tested % Below Mastery % At Mastery Average Performance KINDERGARTEN 2013 2014 9,509 4,462 58% 60% 42% 40% 62% 61% FIRST 2013 2014 10,249 5,657 90% 88% 10% 12% 47% 48% SECOND 2013 2014 11,565 6,020 80% 78% 20% 22% 51% 53% THIRD 2013 2014 13,269 6,784 96% 4% 41% 43% FOURTH 2013 2014 12,563 6,760 94% 95% 6% 5% 44% 45% FIFTH 2013 2014 22,672 21,681 93% 92% 7% 8% 46% 48%

7 Elementary Science Pretest Performance by Reporting Category (2013-2014) GRADE LEVEL LIFE SCIENCE PHYSICAL SCIENCE EARTH & SPACE NATURE OF SCIENCE KINDER62%66%59% FIRST53%51%42% SECOND49%55%47% THIRD37%44%50%29% FOURTH 2013 2014 49% 47%42% 34% 37% FIFTH 2013 2014 45% 47% 52% 54% 43% 45% 36% 38%

8 Your thoughts….. What reporting category do you think showed the highest performance? Why? What reporting category do you think showed the lowest performance? Why? How do you think the students performed on the Fair Game benchmarks? Do you think they performed better than last year? DATA DISAGGREGATION (Baseline 2013-14) Department of Mathematics and Science

9 Grade 5 Baseline Assessment Results (District 2012-2014) YearAssessmentStudent Tested Average % Correct Percent Proficient (70%) 2011Baseline24,14145%5% 2012Baseline23,07647%6% 2013Baseline22,67246%7% 2014Baseline21, 68148%8% Question Group Baseline 2011 Baseline 2012 Baseline 2013 Baseline 2014 Nature of Sc35%38%36%38% Earth Space42%45%43%45% Physical Sc51%53%52%54% Life Science46%47%45%47%

10 Benchmarks 2012 Results 2013 Results Difference (2013-2012) (%) 2014 Results Difference (2014-2013) (%) SC.3.L.14.1 37%34%-337%+3 SC.4.E.5.4 42%41%44%+3 SC.4.E.6.2 30%29%33%+4 SC.4.E.6.3 50%49%51%+2 SC.4.E.6.4 41%38%-342%+4 SC.4.L.16.4 46%43%-346%+3 SC.4.L.17.3 51%49%-252%+3 SC.5.N.1.1 32%30%-232%+2 SC.5.N.2.1 35% -035%0 SC.5.N.2.2 50%48%-250%+2 SC.5.E.5.1 60% -059%+1 SC.5.E.5.3 55% -056%+1 SC.5.E.7.1 37%36%37%+1 Comparison of Grade 5 Baseline Results 2012 - 2014

11 Benchmarks 2012 Results 2013 Results Difference (2013-2012) (%) 2014 Results Difference (2014-2013) (%) SC.5.E.7.342%39%-340%+1 SC.5.P.8.156%57%+157%0 SC.5.P.8.355%51%-454%+3 SC.5.P.9.144% 046%+2 SC.5.P.10.176%74% -279%+5 SC.5.P.10.252%51% 49%-2 SC.5.P.10.447%46% 48%+2 SC.5.P.13.148%49% +151%+2 SC.5.P.13.246%44% -248%+4 SC.5.L.14.155%54% 53% SC.5.L.14.244%42% -244%+2 SC.5.L.17.148%47% 47%0 Comparison of Grade 5 Baseline Results 2012 and 2013

12 Grade 5 Science Assessments Calendar (2014-2015) Baseline: August 18 – Sept 5, 2014 Fall IA: Oct 27 – November 14, 2014 Winter IA: Jan 26 - February 13, 2015 FCAT 2015: (April 13 - May 8, 2015)

13 Interim Assessments (IA) for Grade 5 (All benchmarks will be assessed on Gr 5 Baseline, Fall and Winter assessments) Quarterly Science Benchmark Assessments (QSBA) for Grades K- 4 will assess benchmarks covered in each quarter: Quarters 1, 2, 3, 4 QSBA for K-4 will be administered at the end of each grading period. QSBA Quarter 1 Admin window: Oct 27 – Nov 14, 2014 Available: First QSBA available October 22, 2014 13 Department of Mathematics and Science

14 Grade 5 Science Interim cut scores are based on statistical regression analysis between students performance on Interim Assessment and scale scores on 2012 FCAT 2.0: Fall IA satisfactory cut score: 51% or higher Winter IA satisfactory cut score: 53% or higher (Cut Scores) Baseline Proficiency Level: 70% Gr. 5 Science Interims Cut Scores Department of Mathematics and Science

15 Your thoughts….. What reporting category do you think showed the highest performance? Why? What reporting category do you think showed the lowest performance? Why? How did our performance compare to the State, Broward and West Palm Beach? DATA DISAGGREGATION (FCAT 2014 Results) Department of Mathematics and Science

16 FCAT Science - Grade 5 Year Total Students Tested % Levels 3-5 Physical/ChemicalEarth/SpaceLife/EnvironmentalScientific Thinking Possible Points Avg. % Correct Possible Points Avg. % Correct Possible PointsAvg. % Correct Possible Points Avg. % Correct 201425,638511669%1669%1464%1070% 201325,560511663%1675%1471%1060% 201226,208491663%1669%1471%1070% 201126,422491369%1164%1369%1464% 201026,367441464%1070%1362%1457% 200925,801421258%1354%1362%1354% 200825,875391258%1450%1362%1258% 200725,993341250%1547%1250%1250% GRADE 5 SCIENCE FCAT RESULTS 2007-2014 DISTRICT LEVEL

17 Performance by Reporting Categories (Gr 5 Science FCAT) 2012-2014 (Retro)

18 Performance by achievement levels (Gr 5 Science FCAT 2012-14)

19

20 Grade 5 FCAT Science Comparative Results for MDCPS, State, Broward & Palm Beach (2012-2014)

21 2014 FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT TEST® 2.0 (FCAT 2.0) NEXT GENERATION SUNSHINE STATE STANDARDS State Report of District Results Grade 05 SCIENCE Total Test Scores Mean Points Earned % in each Achievement LevelBy Content Area Grade District Number District Name Number of Students Mean Scale Score 12345 Percentage Passing (Achievement Levels 3 and Above) Nature of Science Earth and Space Science Physical Science Life Science 05Number of Points Possible 1016 14 0500STATE TOTALS195,64520121252813 54711 10 0506BROWARD18,7051992526 121149711 9 0513MIAMI DADE25,638199242627121151711 9 0550PALM BEACH12,9682031825281415577111210 Source: Florida Department of Education Gr 5 Science FCAT 2.0 Scale Score L1 140 - 184 L2 185 - 199 L3 200 - 214 L4 215 – 224 L5 225 - 260

22 -School Performance Data, FCAT, Baseline and Interims http://oada.dadeschools.net http://curriculum.dadeschools.net https://thinkgate.net/FLMiamiDade/ Data Online Resources


Download ppt "Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy, Noreyda Casañas, Daniel Gangeri Curriculum Support."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google