Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Evo-Devo Developmental Patterns and Evolutionary Patterns

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Evo-Devo Developmental Patterns and Evolutionary Patterns"— Presentation transcript:

1 Evo-Devo Developmental Patterns and Evolutionary Patterns
Studying Cell Patterns

2 10.4 Developmental Patterns and evolution
Similar developments indicate evolutionary relationships “Ontogeny recapitulates Phylogeny” Ernst Haeckel Dev’t is a replay of ancestry Haeckel noticed that vertebrate embryos pass through a series of similar stages in early development, and argued that there was a good reason for this. As an organism evolves, he reasoned, it does so by taking on new stages to its process of embryonic development. Therefore, as an organism passes through embryonic development it actually re-traces every stage of its evolutionary ancestry. This idea became known as "Ontogeny recapitulates Phylogeny," which literally means "Development is a replay of Ancestry.“ this is no longer supported in full, but still has a reasonable basis for the relatedness between organism. Ernst Haeckel’s sketches were denounced as fraudulent during his own day but textbook’s to this day continue to publish the pictures.

3 How are organisms related based on morphogenesis?
P 269 as a picture

4 How is morphogenesis determined? What are the literal instructions?

5 10.6 Birth Defects Causes: Polydactyl- extra digits
defective/mutant gene environmental factors acting on developmental genes Polydactyl- extra digits Spina bifida- part of neural tube does not close completely Anencephaly- brain does not completely develop- exposed brain degenerates and top of skull fails to form

6 How do we know? DNA  RNA  proteins (responsible for phenotype/what we see expressed as a trait) All DNA is present in ALL cells Not all DNA is being “read” there4, only certain proteins are made RNA is the intermediary between DNA and protein If RNA is present, that is the proof that the DNA is being “read”

7 DNA-RNA Hybridization
Shows what DNA/genes are being expressed DNA is made single-stranded and tagged with flourescence Labeled DNA is mixed with embryonic cells Under microscope, can see if DNA bound RNA

8 10.8 genetic equivalence of differentiating cells
What happens to unused genes after cell differentiation? Two theories: 1. Selective- Gene- Loss Hypothesis differentiating cells lose some genes 2. Gene Equivalence Hypothesis All cells have same genes but only some are active during differentiation. Genes are not lost- just not expressed.

9 Which Idea is Correct? 2 experiments:
1952- Briggs and King (Fig ) Blastocyst v. skin cell Followed soon after by John Gurdon’s Experiment Tadpole v skin cell CONCLUSION: All cells are genetically equal. No genes are lost. Differentiation restricts the expression of some genes.

10 10.9 Determination and Differentiation
Many embryonic cells are committed to their fate long before differentiation ever begins. Proteostomes tend to be earlier deuterostomes Snail vs. frog exp’ts Sometimes cells determine independently Other cells communicate and affect each other’s determination 2007 video : skin cell SCNT (9:29)

11 2 separated frog cells- each develop into tadpole
Snail cells were irreversibly determined already- would not develop into whole snail *In the frog the cells adjust. The snail could not adjust because cell fate determined early in development WHY? Proteins & RNA distribute unevenly- separated into different cells through cleavage

12 10.11 Cell-Cell Interactions:Embryonic Induction
Differentiation is more flexible in vertebrate embryos Demonstrated by Spemann and Mangold, 1920 Cells moved around in embryo responded to other nearby cells and altered determination Example: skin ectoderm cells moved to dorsal region above notchord became neural tube instead of skin This process is called Embryonic Induction Early blastula but not late gastrula

13 10.11 Cell- Cell Interaction: Role of Notochord
Spemann and Mangold Demonstrated that the notochord is the source of the inducing signal Experiment: tissue determined to become notochord was transferred to another organism 2nd notochord grew  second larva formed! Later experiments: Cell contact not required Inducing proteins are released: chordin and noggin Chordin- notochord formation, anterior-posterior axis Noggin- formation of dorsal structures, ventral ectoderm becomes nerve tissue


Download ppt "Evo-Devo Developmental Patterns and Evolutionary Patterns"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google