Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Nature of Resources, and the Resources of Nature: Framing an Ecological Economics Approach to Problem-Solving Jon D. Erickson Rubenstein School of.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Nature of Resources, and the Resources of Nature: Framing an Ecological Economics Approach to Problem-Solving Jon D. Erickson Rubenstein School of."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Nature of Resources, and the Resources of Nature: Framing an Ecological Economics Approach to Problem-Solving Jon D. Erickson Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources and Natural Resources University of Vermont Burlington, Vermont, USA jon.erickson@uvm.eduwww.uvm.edu/~jdericks/

2 Allocation of scarce resources toward alternative desirable ends 1. What are the desirable ends? 2. What scarce resources are needed to obtain those ends? 3. What ends get priority? (How do we allocate?)

3 Where do you stand?  Economic growth and environmental protection are fundamentally in conflict with one another.  There should be no limit to the amount of money that an individual can earn in today’s society.  Technology and human ingenuity will solve our environmental problems.

4 Allocation of scarce resources toward alternative desirable ends MEANSENDSALLOCATION f (N, L, K) f (L, K) f (K) f ($)

5 Household Firms (production Factor services Goods I n v e s t m e n t ( 3 ) P e r s o n alcons ump tio n ( 4 ) S a v i n g s ( 3 ) I m p o r t s ( 5 ) E x p o r t s ( 5 ) ( 2 )G o v e r n m e n t S p e n d i n g T a x e s ( 2 ) Government Financial markets Other countries W a g e s, r e n t s, i n t e r e s t, p r o f i t s ( 1 ) What’s Wrong with this Picture?

6

7

8 The Epoch of Fossil Fuel Exploitation (after Hubbert, 1969) 0 -5 -4-3 -2 +1 +2+3 +4 +5 Iron in Middle East Stonehenge Built Parthenon completed Pyramids constructed Mayan culture Inquisition Black Death Magellan's Circumnavigation Steam Engine 100 200 300 Trillion kwh per year

9 Composition of U.S. Energy Use (Cleveland)

10

11

12 K Allocated to Humans the Rest of Nature Time Low entropy matter & energy

13 Ecosystem GoodsEcosystem Servicesvs. Knowledge CertaintyRiskUncertaintyIgnorance

14 Allocation of scarce resources toward alternative desirable ends 1. What are the desirable ends? 2. What scarce resources are needed to obtain those ends? 3. What ends get priority? (How do we allocate?)

15 Desirable Ends: 1. Sustainable Scale MB >= MC 2. Just Distribution 3. Efficient Allocation Driving Questions: 1. Growth and the Environment? 2. Limits on income? 3. Technology and ingenuity?

16 1. Sustainable Scale

17

18

19

20 Energy per Capita vs. Happiness (worldvaluessurvey.org)

21 Is Qualitative Development Possible without US-style Energy Use? (Source: UNDP, 2002, WRI, 2002)

22

23 Income 82.7% 11.7% 2.3% 1.9% 1.4% Population 20% Global Income Distribution 2. Just Distribution

24 Overconsumers 1.3 billion > US$7,500 per capita Sustainers 3.5 billion US$700-7,500 per capita Excluded 1.3 billion < US$700 per capita Travel by car and air Travel by bicycle and public surface transport Travel by foot or donkey Eat high-fat, high- calorie, meat-based diets Eat healthy diets of grains, vegetables & some meat Eat nutritionally inadequate diets Drink bottled water and soft drinks Drink clean water plus some tea and coffee Drink contaminated water Use throwaway products & discard substantial wastes Use unpackaged goods and recycled wastes Use local biomass and produce negligible wastes Live in spacious, climate-controlled, 1- family homes Live in modest, vented, multiple- family homes Live in rudimentary shelters or in the open Maintain image- conscious wardrobes Wear functional clothing Wear secondhand clothing or scraps

25 NATURE|VOL 415 | 10 JANUARY 2002 |www.nature.com

26

27 3. Efficient Allocation HouseholdsFirms Maximize Utility Maximize Profit P Q G1 G2 CS PS

28 What are the characteristics of resources relevant to the allocation question?  Goods vs. Services (Flows vs. Funds)  Substitutability  Irreversibility  Renewability  Uncertainty  Externality  Rivalness  Excludability Supply Side f (N, L, K; r)

29 ExcludableNon-Excludable Rival Non- Rival Market Goods Open Access (tragedy of the commons) Tragedy of the Non-commons Pure Public Goods Privatization ~ Externalities ~

30 Demand Side

31 Abandoning Homo Economicus  Insights from Game Theory  Insights from Neuroeconomics

32 Functional MRI of Dopamine Activation

33

34

35

36 Cognitive Load Theory

37 Thinking Discount vs. Emotional Discount Rates

38

39 17002006  A long time ago The discovery of energy in fossil fuels has exponentially increased our ‘grab-bag’ of unexpected returns Rave clubs, scuba diving, NASCAR, etc Bread, butter and ale A visit from a cousin Riding a horse Expected vs. Unexpected Rewards

40 Abandoning Homo Economicus  Insights from Game Theory  Insights from Neuroeconomics  Insights from Sociobiology  Insights from Integrated Human and Environment Histories  Insights from our Evolutionary Hangovers

41

42 Ecological Economics  Get the scale right through science-informed democracy,  Get distribution right through social processes that are fair,  Recognize who we are and where we came from, and then …  Make the economy our servant, instead of our master.


Download ppt "The Nature of Resources, and the Resources of Nature: Framing an Ecological Economics Approach to Problem-Solving Jon D. Erickson Rubenstein School of."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google