Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBryce Flynn Modified over 9 years ago
1
Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan + photoproduction with vector K* (including other recent results) Seung-il Nam *1,2 Atsushi Hosaka 1 Hyun-Chul Kim 2 1.Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Osaka Univ., Japan 2.Nuclear physics & Radiation technology Institute (NuRI), Pusan Univ., Korea RCNP & NuRI
2
Recent status of Theta Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI Recent experiments for pentaquark baryons New evidence for + by LEPS at Spring-8 (1520) (= *) photoproduction revisited experimentally by LEPS ð ++ announced by STAR No clear evidence for + CLAS at JLAB Negative results from BABAR etc Controversial experimental situations Considering photoproduction of +, (LEPS and CLAS) Positive results out of neutron target vs. Negative results out of proton target Positive results out of neutron target vs. Negative results out of proton target Suppression of total cross section for proton? What is the suppression mechanism? Huang, talk given at Beijing (2005) R.De Vita, talk given at APS (2005) talk given at Nara (2005) T.Nakano, talk given at Beijing (2005) S.Ricciardi [BABAR], hep-ex/0507027
3
Recent status of Theta Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI Theoretical interests in this talk * photoproduction concerning + : new analysis Possible interpretation for CLAS result: Isospin asymmetry + photoproduction with K* : reaction process analysis Theoretical framework Effective Lagrangian approach The Born approximation at tree level Phenomenological form factor maintaining the Ward-Takahashi identity Parameters estimated by phenomenological consideration and model calculation Experimental data used for fixing cutoff S.I.N et al.,Phys.Rev.D71,114012 S.I.N et al.,hep-ph/0505134, submitted to Phys.Lett.B S.I.N et al.,in preparation
4
Photoproduction of Lambda* Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI Strong correlation between and (1520) New evidence of + by LEPS at Spring-8 using deuteron target Simultaneous productions of + and * K-K-K-K- D ++++ p **** D ++++ << 1
5
(1520) invariant mass K - p missing mass for Photoproduction of Lambda* + photoproduction from deuteron target by LEPS Only for * resonant region, peak for appears Motivation: Is it possible for extracting information for via *? **** K-K-K-K- D ++++ p Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI
6
Photoproduction of Lambda(1520) Photoproduction of (1520) Interactions Parameters g KN * = 11 (Experiment) g K*N * =0, 11 (Quark model) Rarita-Schwinger vector-spinor field W.Rarita et al.,Phys.Rev.60,61 No PS coupling scheme due to = 0 and = 0 = 0 and = 0 Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI
7
Photoproduction of Lambda* p + * : Proton target Qulitaively well reproduced experimental data; Cutoff =750 MeV Dominant contact term (Kroll-Ruderman) D.P.Barber [Daresbury],Z.Phys.C7,17 Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI
8
Photoproduction of Lambda* n 0 * : Neutron target (No data for cross section) ~30 times smaller n than p due to absence of the contact term Large asymmetry actually shown in the recent LEPS experiment No K* T.Nakano, talk given at Beijing (2005) talk given at Nara (2005) No K* Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI
9
3/2 3/2 3/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 Contact K(spin-0)-exchange K*(spin-1)-exchange Photoproduction of Lambda(1520) RCNP & NuRI K* -dominance scenario proposed by experiments In the experimental analysis, almost (1520) decayed from its |S z |=3/2 state From this fact, K* -exchange was believed as dominant contribution ( t -channel) Theoretical proof: Is this conclusion is correct? Natural consequences for K and K* Large |S z |=3/2 contribution from the contact term not from K* D.P.Barber [Daresbury],Z.Phys.C7,17 Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan
10
CLAS high statistics experiment nK + invariant M pK 0 invariant M ProtonProton (1520) g11 experiment CLAS @JLAB Proton target No obvious peak for Estimation: p / p < 0.2% Corresponding to p < 2 nb The cross section from the proton suppressed? Positive evidence from the neutron target (LEPS) Asymmetry between neutron and proton targets? Hinted by (1520) photoproduction If (1520) and + behave similarly in reaction processes: Spin-3/2 + R.De Vita, talk given at APS (2005) Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI
11
CLAS high statistics experiment Possible explanation for the null results of the CLAS Taking a look at Feynman diagrams… 0000n (1520) e=0 bar 0 p + (1540) e=0 ++++ p (1520) e=1 ----n + (1540) e=1 ðn-p asymmetry for spin-3/2 photoproduction Suppression to the proton target! Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI
12
Photoproduction of Theta(3/2) Photoproduction of + (3/2): Kbar + (3/2) Analogous calculations to * photoproduction: Cutoff =750 MeV Clear n-p asymmetries for two parities = 1 MeV, g =+1 K*N = 3g KN and g =-1 K*N =1/ 3g KN (Quark model) p -wave ( =+1) and d -wave ( =-1) couplings =+1 =-1 NeutronProtonNeutronProton Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan RCNP & NuRI
13
Photoproduction of Theta(3/2) Photoproduction of + (3/2): Kbar + (3/2) Clear n-p asymmetry Our estimation with =1 MeV p < 2 nb and n < 30 nb when 3/2 + p < 2 nb and n < 30 nb when 3/2 + p < 10 nb and n < 240 nb when 3/2 - p < 10 nb and n < 240 nb when 3/2 - p < 5 nb and n < 5 nb when 1/2 + p < 5 nb and n < 5 nb when 1/2 + Possible explanation for the recent CLAS experiment Experimental data for neutron target is necessary Very 2 preliminary CLAS internal report: n < 20 nb Strong suppression for the proton target } N.Baltzell, talk given at CLAS user meeting RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan
14
Photoproduction of Theta(3/2) RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan Photoproduction of + (3/2): K*bar + (3/2) Reaction N + including N * bar + subprocess (planned at CLAS) Three vector meson coupling * * necessary for gauge invariance Including (800,0 + ) with g N = g KN and g K* = g KK* = 1 MeV, g =+1 K*N = 3g KN and g =-1 K*N =1/ 3g KN (QM)
15
Photoproduction of Theta(3/2) RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan Photoproduction of K*bar + (3/2): Positive parity No obvious n-p asymmetry K -exchange ~ contact term Strong forward scattering Photon beam asymmetry d /dt [nb/GeV 2 ]
16
Photoproduction of Theta(3/2) RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan Photoproduction of K*bar + (3/2): Negative parity No obvious n-p asymmetry Strong forward scattering Rather different PBA from =+1 Determination of the parity? Determination of the parity? d /dt [nb/GeV 2 ] Photon beam asymmetry
17
Photoproduction of Theta(1/2) RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan Photoproduction of K*bar + (1/2): Positive parity No obvious n-p asymmetry Strong forward scattering Rather different PBA’s Photon beam asymmetry 3/2 + Photon beam asymmetry 3/2 -
18
Photoproduction of Theta(3/2) RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan Polarizatios in K*bar + Two polarizations: photon and K* Looking at amplitudes…. When photon perpendicular to scattering plane: K* -contribution disappears x z y K*(k 2 ) KKKK y-z plane // K N ·p K*
19
Photoproduction of Theta(3/2) RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan Polarizatios in K*bar + : -exchange survives // K* : -exchange survives : K -exchange survives K* : K -exchange survives Parallel: // K* Perpendicular: K* Due to the amplitude structures }
20
Summary and conclusion RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan (1520) photoproduction Strong correlation between + and * shown by recent LEPS exp. Qualitatively well reproduced data for proton target Predictions for neutron target: much smaller cross sections Dominant contact term contribution: n-p asymmetry or Isospin asymmetry Experiments showed the asymmetry actually Recent CLAS exp. No obvious peak for + : basically proton-photon scattering New LEPS evidence from neutron target: What happened? Strong suppression expected for proton target What is the suppression mechanism? Suggestion: if + spin-3/2, the suppression occurs?
21
Summary and conclusion RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan + (3/2) photoproduction Analougous calculations to those of (1520) Obvious n-p asymmetry shown: Suppression to the proton target p < 2 nb and n < 30 nb when 3/2 + ; p < 10 nb and n < 240 nb when 3/2 - Less dependent on K* -contribution than spin-1/2 + + (3/2) photoproduction with vector K*bar scalar kaon (800)-exchange possible Two polarizations possible: incident photon and outgoing K* Selection rule for interchanging kaon after fixing photon polarization : -exchange survives ; : K -exchange survives // K* : -exchange survives ; K* : K -exchange survives Also valid for spin-1/2 baryon photoproduction
22
RCNP & NuRI Workshop on LEPS/SPring-8 new beamline, 28~29 July 2005, RCNP, Japan Thank you very much
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.