Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRiley McCormack Modified over 11 years ago
1
Comparisons between GERB and the Met Office NWP model Richard Allan, Tony Slingo Environmental Systems Science Centre, University of Reading Sean Milton, Malcolm Brooks Met Office, Exeter Thanks to the GERB International Science Team
2
Sinergee project: www.nerc-essc.ac.uk/~rpa/GERB/gerb.html GERB Model Harries et al. (2005) BAMS; Allan et al. (2005) JGR
3
Objectives Improve experience with satellite datasets including GERB Timely Model Evaluation –using geostationary data independent of the assimilation system Understanding of physical processes
4
ShortwaveLongwave Mean model bias: 2006 All-sky Clear-sky Allan et al. (2007) QJRMS
5
All-sky Clear-sky ShortwaveLongwave Marine stratocumulus Convective cloud Radiative biases in the Met Office global model Convective outflow Surface albedo
6
All-sky Clear-sky ShortwaveLongwave Mineral dust aerosol
7
Dust impact on longwave radiation Large perturbation to Met Office model OLR during summer over west Sahara –Consistent with high mineral dust aerosol optical depth (see also Haywood et al. 2005, JGR) –Used in planning of GERBILS Model minus GERB OLR: July 2006, 12-18 UTC All-skyClear-skydust aerosol
8
18001200 1200 CLEAR 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Model-GERB OLR difference time series 15 o W-5 o E, 15-30 o N
9
Dust impact on longwave radiation Model minus GERB OLR: 12-18 UTC All-skyClear-skydust aerosol June 18-28 2007 July 2006
10
19 June 2007 1800 1500 1200
11
21 June 2007 1800 1500 1200
12
Conclusions Model evaluation –Satellite data independent of assimilation system –Good feedback for modellers and satellite team –Identified biases relating to cloud and surface Mineral dust aerosol over Sahara –Monthly longwave radiative effect up to 50 Wm -2 –Large effect of single events (Slingo et al. 2006, GRL) –June 18-28 2007: smaller dust events than previous years but detectable OLR bias
13
Marine Stratocumulus
14
Curious banding structure –Transition across model levels (see Lock et al. 2001, MWR) Cloud reflectivity bias –Model low-altitude stratiform clouds are too reflective
15
Cloud liquid water path Bias: model minus GERB; SSM/I; SEVIRI Albedo Liquid Water Path Cloud Reduction in model bias from June to July 2006 - relates to cloud liquid water …but see also Horvath and Davies (2007) JGR
16
Convective cloud 5 th June 2006
17
Convective Decay Time-scale Unrealistically low levels of convective cloud On-off; common problem in models Simple fix…
18
Improved shortwave reflectivity
19
Increased convective cloud cover But is the physics any better? Future work: Comparisons with CloudSat
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.