1. National Food Security Mission Investment for assured increase in Production of Food Grains

2. Structure Implementation in the 11 th Plan Progress review Impact analysis Institutionalizing the gains – NFSM ecosystem Mission in the 12 th Plan Approach Technical

3. Big impetus from 2010-11

4. Expansion of NFSM Eastern India Development Accelerated Fodder Development Millets Development Pulses program - RKVY ISOPOM Pulses merger NFSM 4 All Districts for Rice in Eastern Region All Pulses Districts From 2010-11 Outlay for food crops increased from 4882 crores to 9500 crores with support of RKVY

5. NFSM Releases to states 2007-08 to 2011-12 Rs in crores 2007- 08 2008-0 9 2009- 10 2010- 11 2011-1 2Total Releases 382831983113010824408 Exp 1607191111 1182 3723543 % Exp 4269858730 Unspent balances 222334206154 In addition, 293 crores spent 89 % out of 330 crores released to Central Agencies. So total of 3836 crores spent against total release of 4738 crores. An amount of 4882 crores is the approved outlay.

6. Expenditure at Central Level

7. StateReleases% ReleaseExp% Exp U.P8732068078 Maharashtra4771141487 M.P4721132669 AP4611038383 Bihar272622281 Orissa249622992 WB213518788 Rajasthan222516574 Karnataka218517982 Punjab203516581 Chhattisgarh182414278 Assam170414887 TN142311480 Haryana12139780 Gujarat7926582 Jharkhand4312353 Kerala90.2775 J&K30.0600 Total4408100354480 Releases and Expenditure in Rs Crores upto 31 st Dec 11

8. NFSM Rice ComponentExp % Ratio UnderOver Seeds35 11:3 BH (6), MP (7), UP (8), WB, GJ (9), MH (11), AS (14), KA (18), OR (23), JH, TN (24) AP (37), KL (40 ), CG (44) Nutrients25 13:1 TN, CG (6), JH (7), MH, GJ (9), BH (10), KA (11), AP, MP, OR (13), UP (14), KL (19), AS (24) WB (38) Plant Protection 8 5:9 BH (2), AS (3), AP (4), UP (6), CG (7) OR (8), JH, TN (9), KL (11), MH (13), WB (14), MP (18), KA (21) Machinery15 0:14 MP (17), KL (23), CG (25), AP, WB (26), JH (29), OR (33), KA (37), AS (43), MH (45), Guj (46), UP (50), BH (51), TN (52) Local Initiatives <10 4:10 AS (13), BH (14), MP, GJ(17)UP (2), WB, KA, KL, JH (3), TN, CG (5), AP (8), MH, OR (9) Instead of Seeds and Nutrients, States preferred PP and Farm Machinery to promote NFSM Rice

9. NFSM Wheat ComponentExp % Ratio UnderOver Seeds35 6:3WB (7), MP (19), HR (20), MH (22), GJ (33), PB (34) BH (43), RJ (55), UP (60) Nutrients25 6:3BH (8), RJ, MH (11), MP (13, UP (14), GJ (22) HR, PB (26), WB (47) Machinery15 0:9RJ (18), UP (20), PB (25), WB (27), BH (30), GJ (31), MP (39), MH (48), HR (53) Local Initiatives <10 4:5MH (13), WB (12), MP, BH (11) UP (3), GJ (5), PB (6), RJ (7), HR (8) Generally well balanced uptake

10. NFSM Pulses ComponentExp % Ratio UnderOver Seeds35 14:1WB (3), PB (4), HR, OR (6), BH (11), MP (12), TN, GJ (13), MH (15), CG, JH (17), AS (21), RJ (23), KA (27) AP (52) Nutrients25 12:3AP (6), JH (8), KA (9), MP (11), RJ (12), BH, AS, TN (14), PB (18), MH (19), CG (20), UP (21) HR (25), WB (27), GJ (31) Plant Protection 8 7:8BH, RJ (2), PB, HR (3), UP (5), AP, JH (6) CG (13), GJ, AS (14), OR (15), MP (16), KA, MH (17), WB (30) Machinery15 3:12KA (10), TN, AP (12),RJ (20), WB, GJ (23), AS (25), JH (26), MH (31), BH, CG (36), UP (40), OR (41), PB (52), HR (55) Local Initiatives <10 4:11BH (14), RJ (18), PB, TN (21) KA (2),UP (3), AS, CG, MP (4), MH, GJ (5), AP (6), HR, WB (7), OR (10) Seed not so relevant to Pulses, as management practices

11. National pattern of Expenditure ComponentExpected %RiceWheatPulses Seeds35194322 INM2515 14 Machinery15372826 Plant Protection8811 Local Initiative<10757

12. % increase in achievement of physical targets under NFSM – National CropSeedsINMIPM Farm machinery Rice17-8143-6854-7722-100 Wheat53-9521-83-61-100 Pulses69-7429-9761-8724-100

13. Significant outputs OutputArea covered (approx.) Farmers benefited(approx.) 7.40 lakh demonstrations2.96 lakh ha7.4 lakh farmers 146.48 lakh qtls of HYV rice, wheat, pulses distributed 261.07 lakh ha181 lakh farmers Nearly 54000 qtls of hybrid rice distributed 3.3 lakh ha3.5 lakh farmers Nearly 105 lakh hac treated with gypsum/lime/micronutrients 105 lakh ha69 lakh farmers 43 lakh ha of farm land treated under Integrated Pest Management 43 lakh ha30 lakh farmers 31.80 lakh farm implements ( including pump sets & sprinklers) distributed 31.80 lakh farmers Capacity building of the farmers through nearly 44021 Farmers Field Schools 13.21 lakh farmers

14. Production in NFSM Rice States change from 2006-07 in 2010-11

15. Production in NFSM Wheat States change from 2006-07 in 2010-11

16. Production in NFSM Pulses States change from 2006-07 in 2010-11

17. “We need a second green revolution in Agriculture. We can tackle the problem of rising food prices only by increasing agriculture production and productivity. We also need to increase agriculture production to implement a food security law. We will accelerate our efforts in this direction in the 12 th plan”. Hon’ble Prime Minister in his address to the nation on Independence Day (15 th August, 2011) Commitment

18. NFSM in 12 th plan Components11 th plan12 th plan Crops Rice, Wheat, PulsesRice, wheat, Pulses, fodder, Millets and Maize Aim & objective Food grains securityFoodgrains and fodder security Additional Foodgrains production target 20 million tons Rice- 10, Wheat-8, Pulses-2 m. tons 25 million tons Rice- 10, Wheat- 10 ; Pules-3, Coarse cereals- 2 million tons Area of operation 19 states and 481 districts All the states and districts -for additional stabilized foodgrain production FocusLow productive potential areas Low productive areas for additional production and high productive areas for sustained production through conservation agriculture

19. NFSM in 12th plan Components11 th plan12 th plan Technicalindividual crop specific interventions Cropping System based Block demonstrations in cluster approach- Accelerated Crop Production programme- 15% of low productive areas Sustainable Crop Production Programme- 30% of high productive areas Special emphasis on development of remote & inaccessible areas through NGOs Strategic research not part of the scheme Support to national and international agencies for adaptive research Subsidy rates Upward revisions as per current costs New interventions Farm Machinery, asset building and rainwater harvesting structures

20. NFSM Ecosystem NFSM HRDPolicyR & DReach Pilots Solar fencing CGIAR projects NCIPM NABARD/SFAC Studies PMTs and CDDs NCAP AERCs FAO Performance orientation Indicators - NPC Krishi Karman Awards Fellowships MoU with IRRI and CIMMYT Visits Training Outlooks - NCAER Production – DES, NCFC Price – DES, DCA Markets – Agmarknet, CE Trade – DGFT, Stocks – FPD Utilization – NSSO Web site Information Interaction Social Media Blog Twitter Facebook

21. 17 Study Topics across States TopicsDirectorates/NFSM ConsultantLikely issues to be studied Potential and constraints in Conservation Agriculture Practices in East U.P. and Bihar (only two best districts) DWD, Ghaziabad NFSM Consultants-Machinery/ BGREI Feasibility of conservation agriculture in view of soil and crop cycle. How many have continued after programme shifted to other farmers? Is any other viable practice? What is the gain in productivity? Higher productivity due to better crop stand/geometry or early sowing? How much cost saving, if any? Does cost savings takes into account the loss of crop residue which could have been used for economic purposes? DRD Patna, Dr.S.S.Singh, & Mr. S.V Singh, Consultant BGREI Impact of irrigation pumps in productivity gain of rice in West Bengal DJD Kolkata, Consultants- Mr. Shamsher Singh and Mr. S.V.Singh What was the productivity level before pump installed? Is adequate electricity supply available for operation? Any viable alternative? Quality of water being pumped-more of arsenic/salt or normal? Adoption of System of rice intensification in Tamilnadu- constraints, prospects DTD Chennai, NFSM Consultant – Dr.Saini, Consultant, NFSM Are all 6 concepts of SRI followed? If not what are the practices followed? How many farmers continued/discontinued the practice? Reason for continuing or discontinuing? What is the productivity gain? Suggestions for improvement. Reasons for low productivity in some districts of Tamilnadu- Ramnathpuram, Shivaganga etc. –and strategy for improvement DTD Chennai, NFSM Consultant – Dr.D.G.Gupta, 60000 pulses villages Reasons for low performance. Technology promoted and its performance. What could be alternatives? Whether demanded or forced? How does it link with SREP and C-DAP? Reasons for low productivity in Karnataka and strategy for improvement DOD, Hyderabd Dr.G.P.Gupta & R.S.Saini, Consultant, NFSM Reasons for low performance. Technology promoted and its performance. What could be alternatives? Whether demanded or forced? How does it link with SREP and C-DAP? Impact of ICRISAT initiatives in rice fallows in Chhattisgarh DPD, Bhopal Dr.R.K.Gupta& Dr. Shankar lal Consultants, NFSM Is it crop replacement or additional area gained? Why no crop was being taken by farmers earlier? How much area out of total fallow is feasible for steady crop coverage? Replacement of existing practices/varieties with ICRISAT variety, if any Is there better option? Productivity and production gain?

22. Responses from the States Crop situation for kharif pulses and Rabi Coordination with SASA for area and production figures Complete concurrent evaluations, particularly for lagging districts – what works and what does not? Complete Online data entry from Districts into MIS APY data of the districts upto 2010-11 Assign State and District PMTs to work on study topics Information for A3P booklet in the prescribed format Popularize Ridge Furrow Planters for pulses Progress of approved additional pulses program of NFSM Status of pest surveillance in A3P units of NFSM & RKVY

23. Sum up Mission is an engrossing journey and its work fulfilling for personal and professional development More responsibility in 12 th Plan would demand better organization of work Farmers as well as the field functionaries need to be armed with better technologies and tools Developing networks of professionals across institutions would be the key to success Thank You!