Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTodd Little Modified over 9 years ago
1
KENT COUNTY HOMELESS STUDY KENT COUNTY HOMELESS STUDY MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR URBAN AFFAIRS CENTER FOR URBAN AFFAIRS FALL 2000
2
RESEARCH TEAM MEMBERS b JEFF FROMMEYER – MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK CANDIDATE b TAMMY L. HOLT – MASTER OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING CANDIDATE b DR. REX LAMORE - STATE DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR URBAN AFFAIRS b DR. JOHN SCHWEITZER- PROFESSOR OF THE URBAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM
3
RESEARCH ADVISORS b ROBERT SCHIRADO - PLANNER, KENT COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT b JAMES WINSLOW – HOUSING ADMINISTRATOR, KENT COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT b MICHAEL STACHOWIAK – HOMELESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, SALVATION ARMY b BETTY ZYLSTRA- DIRECTOR OF BOOTH SERVICES, SALVATION ARMY
4
KENT COUNTY HOMELESS STUDY b INTRODUCTION b DESCRIPTION OF DATA b RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS b RECOMMENDATIONS
5
DESCRIPTION OF DATA b PERIOD OF DATA COLLECTION b PARTICIPATING SHELTERS b CLIENT INFORMATION SHEET (INTAKE FORM)
6
PARTICIPATING SHELTERS b CASA DE LA PAZ b THE BRIDGE b DOMESTIC CRISIS CENTER b GUIDING LIGHT WOMEN’S MISSION b HOMELESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM b ICCF FAMILY HAVEN b MEL TROTTER MISSION b RAMOTH HOUSE b RECUPERATION CENTER b RED CROSS b THE SALVATION ARMY b SENIOR NEIGHBORS b WELL HOUSE
7
PRIOR SHELTER HISTORY (INCLUDING MISSING DATA)
8
PRIOR SHELTER HISTORY
9
RECENT RESIDENCE
10
HIGH SCHOOL / GED
11
ATTENDED COLLEGE
12
FAMILY COMPOSITION
13
FAMILY SIZE
14
AGE OF PRIMARY CLIENT b Mean age was 29.2 b Youngest was 9 b Oldest was 87 b 92% were younger than 46 years
15
GENDER
16
FAMILY RACE
17
SOURCES OF FAMILY INCOME
18
REASONS FOR HOMELESSNESS IN PERCENT
19
VETERAN HOUSEHOLD
20
MOVED FROM SHELTER TO:
21
RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS b QUANTIFYING HOMELESSNESS b OVERALL INCIDENTS b LENGTH OF STAY b RECIDIVISM b DEMOGRAPHIC CROSSTABS
22
WAYS OF QUANTIFYING HOMELESSNESS b Incidents - indicated by intake forms Single person or a familySingle person or a family Unique incident or recidivismUnique incident or recidivism b Unique ID’s b Length of stay: date left-date entered b Bed-Nights: (family size) x (length of stay)
23
MEASURES OF HOMELESSNESS IN THE FIVE YEAR PERIOD b 11,132 incidents in five years 5,104 unique incidents5,104 unique incidents 2,005 individuals were recidivists2,005 individuals were recidivists 6,028 repeated incidents6,028 repeated incidents b Family size mean = 2.2 b Length of stay averaged 9.5 days b Average incident used 20.9 bed-nights b 226,803 total bed-nights
24
INCIDENTS OF HOMELESSNESS INVOLVING CHILDREN b 66% of the incidents involved children 37%involved children under age 637%involved children under age 6 32% involved children aged 6-1732% involved children aged 6-17 15% of the incidents were single children under age 1815% of the incidents were single children under age 18 b There were 14,211 children involved in homeless incidents b 129,240 bed-nights were used by children
25
INCIDENTS OF HOMELESSNESS BY YEAR
26
BED-NIGHTS BY YEAR
27
LENGTH OF STAY b Average length was 9.5 days b Most frequent (18%) was 1 day b 61% stayed less than 1 week b 8% stayed more than 4 weeks
28
LENGTH OF STAY (DAYS) BY REASON FOR HOMELESSNESS
29
LENGTH OF STAY BY SHELTER GROUP
30
INCIDENTS OF HOMELESSNESS BY SHELTER GROUP
31
REPEATED INCIDENTS OF HOMELESSNESS b Of the 11,132 incidents, 46% were one timers b 20% were persons who had two incidents b 15% had 5 or more incidents of homelessness in the five year period
32
USE OF HOMELESS SHELTERS IN BED-NIGHTS BY RECIDIVISM
33
PERCENT OF RECIDIVISM BY REASONS FOR HOMELESSNESS
34
RECIDIVISM BY GENDER
35
RECIDIVISM BY RACE
36
RECIDIVISM BY FAMILY COMPOSITION
37
RECIDIVISM BY WHERE CLIENT MOVED TO b More Likely to Repeat Homeless Episode Another shelterAnother shelter Substance abuse treatmentSubstance abuse treatment b Less Likely to Repeat Out of townOut of town Returned to last residenceReturned to last residence VA facilityVA facility
38
NUMBERS OF HOMELESS PEOPLE BY RACE AND GENDER
39
PERCENT OF HOMELESS MALES AND FEMALES BY RACE
40
RECIDIVISM BY RACE AND GENDER
41
RECOMMENDATIONS b INTAKE FORM b CHILDREN AS CUSTOMERS b REASON FOR HOMELESSNESS b PARTNERSHIPS
42
INTAKE FORM b TRAINING FOR INTAKE WORKERS b EDUCATIONAL LEVEL- ENTER HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED b PRIMARY REASON FOR STAY CATEGORY - SPECIFY WHAT “OTHER” MEANS b SIZE OF FAMILY CATEGORY - REPLACE WITH THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE SEEKING SHELTER
43
INTAKE FORM b INCLUDE A CATEGORY FOR REFERRING AGENCY, WALK-IN, POLICE DROP-OFF, ETC. b FAMILY COMPOSITION -COMPLETE A SEPARATE INTAKE FORM FOR EACH ADULT SEEKING SHELTER
44
CHILDREN AS CUSTOMERS b 66% OF INCIDENTS INVOLVE CHILDREN b 37% OF INCIDENTS INVOLVE CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 6YRS. b HOW DO THESE CHILDREN PERCEIVE THEIR HOMELESS EXPERIENCE
45
REASON FOR HOMELESSNESS b FINANCIAL - RECIDIVISM b DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE - RECIDIVISM b TANF - TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES b LACK OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS BEING PRODUCED
46
PARTNERSHIPS b YOU CAN’T GO IT ALONE b NEED FOR A PATH TO STABLE HOUSING PRODUCTION (IF UNITS ARE AVAILABLE) b STRONG COOPERATION WITH DOMESTIC ASSUALT, MENTAL HEALTH, AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
47
KENT COUNTY HOMELESS STUDY KENT COUNTY HOMELESS STUDY MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR URBAN AFFAIRS CENTER FOR URBAN AFFAIRS FALL 2000
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.