Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBeatrix Cross Modified over 9 years ago
2
Disclosures Paid Consultant, MedQIA LLC Paid Consultant, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Consultant, Genentech Consultant, Siemens Medical Systems B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
3
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured clinically reflects extracellular water ADC is dependent on tumor cell density (Ellingson, 2010; Sugahara, 1999; Lyng, 2000; Chenevert, 2000; Gaurain, 2001; Nonomura, 2001; Guo, 2002; Chen, 2005; Hayashida, 2006; Manenti, 2008; Kinoshita, 2008 – Cell Density (hypercellular) = ADC – Cell Density (hypocellular) = ADC Diffusion MR Characteristics of the Central Nervous System Viable Tumor (Dark) Necrotic Core Edema ADC Map From: Ellingson, J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010 B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
4
The Functional Diffusion Map (fDM) (Moffat, 2005; 2006; Hamstra, 2005; 2008; Ellingson, 2010) From: Ellingson, JMRI, 2010 B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
5
Graded fDMs Allow Visualization and Quantification of Growing Tumor + Hypercellular+ Hypocellular Biological Calibration From: Ellingson, JMRI, 2010 B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
6
Graded fDMs Allow Better Visualization of Growing Tumor + Hypercellular+ Hypocellular B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
7
What about anti-angiogenic therapy? B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
8
What about anti-angiogenic therapy? B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
9
What about anti-angiogenic therapy? B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured clinically reflects extracellular water Large changes in ADC after anti-angiogenic therapy reflect (largely) reduction in edema Subtle decreases in ADC after anti-angiogenic treatment are likely to contain solid / infiltrating tumor
10
What about anti-angiogenic therapy? B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
11
What about anti-angiogenic therapy? B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
12
What about anti-angiogenic therapy? B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
13
What about anti-angiogenic therapy? B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Hypotheses: 1. Traditional fDMs (single threshold) edema changes + tumor growth greater risk of failure
14
What about anti-angiogenic therapy? B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Hypotheses: 1. Traditional fDMs (single threshold) edema changes + tumor growth greater risk of failure 2. Graded fDMs tumor growth greater risk of failure
15
What about anti-angiogenic therapy? B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Hypotheses: 1. Traditional fDMs (single threshold) edema changes + tumor growth greater risk of failure 2. Graded fDMs tumor growth greater risk of failure 3. Graded fDMs + pre-treatment ADC + T1+C active tumor burden GREATEST RISK (BEST PREDICTOR) Pope, Radiology, 2009; Pope, AJNR, 2011
16
Methods B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Patients N = 77 patients - Pathology confirmed GBM with recurrence confirmed via histology or clinical features - Regularly treated every 2 weeks per cycle with becacizumab (5-10 mg/kg) - Baseline & minimum of one follow-up with high-quality diffusion MRI MRI Clinical MR sequences on 1.5T T2w, FLAIR, T1w, T1+C 3-5mm slice thickness Diffusion MRI w/ twice refocused spin echo preparation ADC calculated from b=0 and b=1000 s/mm 2
17
Methods B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Image Registration All images registered to Baseline T1 weighted images Mutual information + 12 dof transformation Graded fDM Calculation - Voxel-wise subtraction - Each voxel classified according to relative difference from previous calibration studies From: Ellingson, JMRI, 2010
18
Methods B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Traditional fDM ΔADC beyond 0.4 um 2 /ms
19
Methods B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Traditional fDM ΔADC beyond 0.4 um 2 /ms Graded fDM ΔADC between 0.25 and 0.4 um 2 /ms (7.5% probability of occurring randomly)
20
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
21
From: Ellingson, Neuro Onc, 2011 Results Conventional response does not predict survival
22
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Conventional response does not predict survival
23
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Graded fDM regions are localized to post-treatment contrast enhancement
24
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Traditional and graded fDMs both predict survival
25
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 T1+C is better than FLAIR
26
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Graded fDMs are better than traditional fDMs
27
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Graded fDMs in T1+C
28
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 ADC distribution for graded fDMs is different than traditional fDMs and contrast-enhancing regions Chi-squared goodness of fit, P < 0.05 Between CE and graded fDMs For 46 of 77 patients
29
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 ADC distribution for graded fDMs is different than traditional fDMs and contrast-enhancing regions Chi-squared goodness of fit, P < 0.05 Between CE and graded fDMs For 46 of 77 patients
30
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 ADC distribution for graded fDMs is different than traditional fDMs and contrast-enhancing regions Chi-squared goodness of fit, P < 0.05 Between T1+C and graded fDMs For 46 of 77 patients Graded fDMs FILTER
31
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Graded fDMs + Pre-Tx ADC Characteristics
32
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Graded fDMs + Pre-Tx ADC Characteristics in T1+C BEST PREDICTOR
33
Results B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Graded fDMs + Pre-Tx ADC Characteristics in T1+C BEST PREDICTOR
34
Summary B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Graded fDMs + Pre-Tx ADC Characteristics in T1+C BEST PREDICTOR
35
Summary B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Graded fDMs + Pre-Tx ADC Characteristics in T1+C BEST PREDICTOR
36
Conclusions Both traditional and graded fDMs in FLAIR and T1+C were predictive of OS B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
37
Conclusions Both traditional and graded fDMs in FLAIR and T1+C were predictive of OS Subtle changes in ADC after anti-angiogenic therapy w/in T1+C may reflect active tumor burden B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
38
Conclusions Both traditional and graded fDMs in FLAIR and T1+C were predictive of OS Subtle changes in ADC after anti-angiogenic therapy w/in T1+C may reflect active tumor burden Graded fDMs + Pre-Tx ADC Characteristics in T1+C BEST PREDICTOR Median Survival Advantage of 7 months B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011
39
Radiology Whitney Pope, M.D., Ph.D. Dieter Enzmann, M.D. Jonathan Goldin, M.D. MedQIA Neurology/Neuro-Oncology Timothy Cloughesy, M.D. Albert Lai, M.D., Ph.D. Phioanh (Leia) Nghiemphu, M.D. Thank You! B.M. Ellingson, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAISMRM, Montreal, 2011 Neurosurgery Linda Liau, M.D. Bob Shafa, M.D. Antonio DeSalles, M.D. Pathology Paul Mischel, M.D. Bill Yong, M.D. David Geffen School of Medicine Taryar Zaw, B.S. Korosh Neini, M.D. Bobby Harris, B.S. Carissa White, B.S. Medical College of Wisconsin Kathleen Schmainda, Ph.D. Peter LaViolette, B.S.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.