1. Mobility in Government Martin Grey, Solutions Architect Unit 18 April, 2013

2. 2 iGovTT Mobility Pilot

3. Current State What is the current state? – Reliance on proprietary technology Blackberry / RIM – Sanctioned for specific user groups Management Team Board of Directors Business Development Team – Non sanctioned smart device users – Platforms from Microsoft, Blackberry, Android, Apple / Others – Company wide

4. Current state cont’d Pros:- Highly secured Robust Centralized Management Cons:- Proprietary / Limited Platform Expandability Potential smart device user base not exploited Feature set limited to single platform Non flexible user preference / choice Limited new device availability (Lengthy device cycle) Tablets usage not exploited Limitations of productivity 4

5. iGovTT Mobility Pilot Test feasibility of using smart devices to increase staff productivity 3 rotations conducted Each rotation 3 week lifespan Broad cross-section of user base 4 major platforms tested 2 device types tested Survey at the end of each phase Analysis / report of collated surveys

6. Report Survey Results Per smartphone productivity Per tablet productivity Phone Utilization at Office/Remote Tablet Utilization at Office/Remote Level of Satisfaction from 4G Access Ease of use per phone Ease of use per tablet Overall ease of mobility (screen size/weight/overall size) per phone Overall ease of mobility (screen size/weight/overall size) per tablet Overall percentage increase in productivity

7. Per Smart Phone Productivity

8. Per Tablet Productivity

9. Device Utilization – Smart Phone

10. Device Utilization – Tablets

11. 4G Access

12. Ease of Use

14. Phone Mobility

15. Tablet Mobility

16. Overall Productivity

17. Mobility Pilot - Conclusion Users of smart phones saw a significant increase in productivity Users of tablets saw an increase in productivity but not as much as smart phone users There was no clear platform for smart phone devices There was no clear platform for tablet devices BYOD?