Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byErik Patterson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Closing date 28 February 2008
2
Assessment of your recent research track record International peer review Based on the quality of research outputs What is an NRF rating?
3
Why should researchers seek to be rated? Benchmarking Access to NRF funding for 5 years
4
Applicants Designated authorities at employing organisations NRF staff (Evaluation Centre) Specialist Committees Role players (1)
5
Reviewers (local and international) Assessors Chairpersons Higher level Committees (executive and appeal) Role players (2)
6
C, B, A Established researchers NRF rating categories Y, P, L Researchers who show promise to be come established
7
Not accepted Specialist Committee How is your application processed? (1) Submission of scholarly achievements Selection of 6 peers (reviewers) Joint meeting Specialist Committee Assessor Reviewers’ reports
8
How is your application processed? (2) Appeal Joint meeting ConsensusNo Consensus Inform Applicant Appeals Committee E xecutive E valuation C ommittee B, C, Y, L* A, P recommendation
9
Not accepted Specialist Committee Submission of scholarly achievements Selection of 6 peers (reviewers) Joint meeting Specialist Committee Assessor Reviewers’ reports
10
Animal & Veterinary Sciences Anthropology, Development Studies, Geography, Sociology & Social Work Biochemistry Chemistry Communication, Media Studies & Library & Information Science Earth Sciences Economics, Management, Administration & Accounting Education Engineering Health Sciences Historical Studies Information Technology Specialist Committees (1)
11
Law Literary Studies, Languages & Linguistics Mathematical Sciences Microbiology & Plant Pathology Performing & Creative Arts, & Design Physics Plant Sciences Psychology Politics, Policy Studies & Philosophy Religious Studies & Theology L Committee Key research areas and types of research outputs http://evaluation.nrf.ac.za/Content/Documents/Rating/krab_2007_July.doc Specialist Committees (2)
12
Tasks of Specialist Committees Selecting reviewers Assessing reviewers’ reports Recommending a rating for each applicant based on reports by reviewers Identifying feedback Rating reports by reviewers Advising NRF
13
Not accepted Specialist Committee Submission of scholarly achievements Selection of 6 peers/reviewers) Joint meeting Specialist Committee Assessor Peer/reviewers’ reports
14
Applicants are given the opportunity to nominate their own peers. They are also given the opportunity to indicate who should not be approached. A mix of national and international peers is appropriate in most cases. Ideological differences within disciplines in the social sciences and humanities could confound the selection of suitable peers, however, reports by peers in such instances should be identifiable and treated appropriately by wise panel members. Peers/Reviewers
15
Not accepted Specialist Committee Submission of scholarly achievements Selection of 6 peers (reviewers) Joint meeting Specialist Committee Assessor Reviewers’ reports
16
Quality of research outputs over the last seven years Standing as a researcher, nationally and internationally What are peers/reviewers asked to comment on?
17
Not accepted Specialist Committee Submission of scholarly achievements Selection of 6 peers (reviewers) Joint meeting Specialist Committee Assessor Reviewers’ reports
18
Five best recent research outputs (last 7 years) Ten best research outputs before that Description of completed research Self-assessment Postgraduate students Other research-based contributions Ongoing and future research Information required by NRF from applicant Personal details Career profile Qualifications obtained Assessment panel(s) to consider application Nominated reviewers Application for L category? Relevant biographical sketch Research outputs of last seven years*
19
Research outputs of the last 7 years 1 Jan 2001 to 31 Dec 2007 Publications in peer- reviewed journals Books/chapters in books Peer-reviewed published conference proceedings Other significant conference outputs Patents, artefacts and products Technical reports Postgraduate students trained Keynote/Plenary addresses Other recognised research outputs
20
Applying online: http://nrfonline.nrf.ac.za/
21
Types of rating applications New Re-evaluation by invitation Re-evaluation Special re-evaluation
22
Evaluation and rating takes place every 5 years (for successful applicants) The period under review is the past 7 years e.g. 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2007 Time Frames
23
The online application form … …has been accessible from 3 September 2007… NB Find out what your institution’s internal closing date is! …and the call will close on (Thursday) 28 February 2008
24
Application in MSWord format (not for submission) http://evaluation.nrf.ac.za/Content/Documents/Rating/ratingform2008%20wor d%20template.doc Guidelines and instructions for completing the application for evaluation and rating via NRFOnline http://evaluation.nrf.ac.za/Content/Documents/Rating/RatingHelp%20for%20n rfonline%20system%20closing%20date%20feb%202008.doc Brochure on the NRF’s evaluation and rating of the research performance of researchers in SA http://evaluation.nrf.ac.za/Content/Documents/Rating/evaluation_brochure_2 007_July.doc Online application form http://nrfonline.nrf.ac.za Sources of information
25
Evaluation Centre Contact Details fax no: 012-481-4010 and website: http://www.nrf.ac.za/evaluation/ Postal address Evaluation Centre, National Research Foundation, PO Box 2600, Pretoria, 0001 PersonTelephoneEmail Ms Gudrun Schirge012 481 4106gudrun@nrf.ac.za Ms Anita Basson012 481 4247anita@nrf.ac.za Ms Wieneke Huizinga012 481 4052wieneke@nrf.ac.za Mrs Patricia Leeson012 481 4152patricia@nrf.ac.za Ms Kealeboga Letlhaku012 481 4089 kealeboga@nrf.ac.za Mrs Diane Monteiro012 481 4033diane@nrf.ac.za Mrs Tasneem Parsotam012-481 4107 tasneem@nrf.ac.za Mrs Desiree Sassman012 481 4199desiree@nrf.ac.za Ms Kopano Setlhare012 4814152kopano@nrf.ac.za Mrs Lizzy Ledwaba012 481 4036eledwaba@nrf.ac.za
26
http://www.nrf.ac.za/evaluation/Content/Facts/ratings.aspx Thank you Evaluation Centre website You are invited to visit the Evaluation Centre website to view the list of NRF rated researchers. This list can be searched according to names of rated researchers, research specialisations, institutions and rating descriptors.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.