Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Vertical thermal conductance test for carrier rev E In the production design, thermal impedance of the sidewalls through carrier boards is a potentially.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Vertical thermal conductance test for carrier rev E In the production design, thermal impedance of the sidewalls through carrier boards is a potentially."— Presentation transcript:

1 Vertical thermal conductance test for carrier rev E In the production design, thermal impedance of the sidewalls through carrier boards is a potentially very significant term in operating temperature for the SCROD and upper carrier boards. FOR EXAMPLE IN THE EXAMPLE Vias of present design pattern, IPC wall spec 45 Watts flows down each side through bottom carrier board [Pessimistic?? Hopefully!] Results in nominal 8 degree rise crossing vertically through bottom carrier board At SCROD, sidewalls at 64 degrees – and this is optimistic (no interface impedance!) At the SCROD, 22 degree rise relative to infinitely thermally conducting carrier boards TEST IT

2 Load: 3x TIP31C, V CE =10 V, total I C =4.0 A, soldered to copper plate inserted into sidewall stack, with thermal goop on copper plate only Cold plate with water ~0 °C (measured in reservoir) Temperature measured with contact thermocouple with small beads of thermal goop at outside of spacer blocks immediately above/below the SCROD. And above/below the junction to HVB bracket and at bottom of HVB bracket, and top of cold plate nearby. SCROD standing in for carrier rev E All 16 screws carefully torqued to 12 inch pounds! Two spacers below (needed for clearance)

3 LocationAll dryHVB bottom gooped HVB top also gooped Spacer above board 49.346.8tbd, will update slides Spacer below board 32.531.1 Spacer above HVB 25.021.9 HVB near top18.916.8 HVB near bottom 13.510.0 Cold plate nearby 7.37.5 With 40 W (one-side) load as detailed on previous slide, temperatures in °C Result is ~17 °C rise vertically through the board Note: there is of course some variation in the exact position & quality of thermal contact at the different measurement points.

4 By the way, this is an old HVB that has been hacked to be compatible with new and old bolt pattern. Certainly sacrificing some cooling performance! We really should be doing this test with new, alodined HVB brackets and the new- type cold plate. Don’t have that yet for the test fixture (another topic…).

5 UPDATE 12/12/2014 First reconfirmed ~same results as before Then, switched to real carrier rev E, and relocated the heater slightly (it should be in “next” carrier board position for more accurate results, but wasn’t possible using the SCROD as a stand-in; also the SCROD couldn’t be put in place of bottom carrier board (connector conflicts with HVB bracket)). Now, real carrier board, in bottom position, ~40W heater in next carrier board position.

6

7 Omega # 88008E 1×3 mm 2 surface probe

8 LocationCarrier DryCarrier w/ thermal grease Spacer above board 36.728.5 Spacer below board 22.421.6 Spacer above HVB 19.419.0 HVB near top16.616.3 HVB near bottom 10.110.2 Cold plate nearby 7.06.6 With 41.9 W (one-side) load (10.04V, 4.17A), all screws unlubricated, torqued to 12 inch-pounds (pardon my units!). Temperatures in °C Result (dry) is ~14 °C rise vertically through the board [wet ~7 °C]


Download ppt "Vertical thermal conductance test for carrier rev E In the production design, thermal impedance of the sidewalls through carrier boards is a potentially."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google