Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Sally Shaver Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency Fall 2004 WESTAR Business Meeting October 4-6, 2004 Agricultural.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Sally Shaver Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency Fall 2004 WESTAR Business Meeting October 4-6, 2004 Agricultural."— Presentation transcript:

1 Sally Shaver Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency Fall 2004 WESTAR Business Meeting October 4-6, 2004 Agricultural Air Quality

2 Ag Strategy Vision Statement Clean Air Sustainable Agriculture Sound Land Management Clean Water Key elements: Scientific assessment Outreach and education Implementation/compliance

3 Ozone and PM designations and implementation –Fugitive dust –Conservation management practices Permitting –Title V –New source review –Offsets Pesticide application What are the issues?

4 Agricultural equipment –Title II rule amendment - pumps Fire –Prescribed fire, wildfire –BlueSky/Rains AFO/CAFO –Particulate Matter (PM) –Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) –Ammonia (NH3) –Odor What are the issues? (cont)

5 Attainment or Unclassifiable Areas (2668 counties) Nonattainment Areas (432 entire counties) Nonattainment Areas (42 partial counties) Attainment and Nonattainment Areas in the U.S. 8-Hour Ozone Standard

6 State Recommendations for Fine Particles National Ambient Air Quality Standards Nonattainment (full county): 142 Nonattainment (partial county): 9

7 EPA Response to State Recommendations on PM 2.5 Designations – June 29, 2004

8 Counties Designated Nonattainment for PM10

9 Title V – NSR Ag Impacts Title V could apply to farms, resulting in: -Paperwork burden -Unnecessary public scrutiny -Little if any benefit for the additional burden -Continuous compliance assurance monitoring and reporting -Biosecurity impacts

10 Title V – NSR Ag Impacts (cont) Change in farming practices could trigger NSR (NSR being the bigger issue), resulting in: -Requirements to obtain offsets for emissions increases -Applying lowest achievable emissions rate to new equipment or new practices -Paperwork burden

11 Pesticide Application VOC Toxics Methyl Bromide Spray Drift

12 Agricultural Equipment Emissions from farm equipment – PM and NOx Irrigation pumps –Stationary source v. mobile – State regulated –Mobile source – national rules apply –Title II Alternatives –Cleaner burning diesel engines –Natural gas engines –Electric engines

13 Fire

14 Pollutants: –PM –Regional haze –Episodic ozone –Air toxics Impacts: –Water runoff to streams –Air quality –Visibility –Smoke

15 EPA’s Fire Policies EPA acknowledges the use of fire as an efficient and economical land management tool in maintaining the health of fire-tolerant and fire- dependent plant and animal ecosystems –Maintain species diversity –Enhance agricultural production –Eliminate the threat of disease –Reduce catastrophic wildfires PM-10 Natural Events Policy (1996) Interim Air Quality Policy on Wildland and Prescribed Fires (1998) Agricultural Burning Policy (on hold)

16 Blue Sky RAINS BlueSky/RAINS (BSR) is an interactive web-based tool that predicts smoke concentrations on a variety of sensitive receptors BSR couples the latest available science in fire behavior and smoke dispersion from the BlueSky framework developed by the USFS with the Geographical Information System (GIS) and sequential database technology of the Rapid Access Information System (RAINS) developed by EPA R10

17 Blue Sky RAINS (cont.) EPA Region 10 and the USDA Forest Service have successfully operated BSR in the Pacific Northwestern US since March 2003 –Leavitt Initiative - expand the BSR nationwide within the next 1 to 2 years –Currently, a beta version of the BSR that covers all or part of 11 western states is being tested

18 Animal Feeding Operations (AFO) NAS Commissioned: –EPA and USDA asked NAS to perform CAFO air emissions study NAS Study Conclusions: –No reliable emissions factors for AFO exist –Additional data needed to develop estimating methodologies –Current methods for estimating emissions not appropriate –Use process-based approach

19 Industry: - Pay a civil penalty (per facility) - Contribute to nationwide emissions monitoring program ($2,500) - Make facilities available for monitoring - At conclusion of study, apply emissions-estimating methodologies to identify applicable CAA, CERCLA and EPCRA requirements - Certify compliance with CAA permitting and CERCLA and EPCRA notification provisions - EPA grants limited covenant not to sue Key Features of the Proposed Agreement


Download ppt "Sally Shaver Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency Fall 2004 WESTAR Business Meeting October 4-6, 2004 Agricultural."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google