1. Warren Roane Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD Warren Roane Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD Best Laid Plans: EOC Projections, Results and Consequences Best Laid Plans: EOC Projections, Results and Consequences http://www.humbleisd.net/Page/38302

2. Brief History Projections: Districts, Teachers, Students Results: Impact on Districts, Teachers, Students Consequences: Districts, Teachers, Students

3. Voluntary EOC ca. 1994-1999 Required EOC ca. 1999-2001 Required TAKS 2002-2011 Voluntary EOC 2005-2010 Required EOC with 15% requirement 2012 Suspended 15% requirement 2012, 2013 Removed 15% requirement 2013 Removed cumulative score 2013

5. Legislation Decisions STAAR 15% Moratorium on 15% Live tests Release of EOC results EOC to TAKS bridge study EOC as part of 2013 Accountability

6. Live Tests Release of EOC results Bridge Study Release

7. EOC as part of 2013 Accountability AYP? Removal of 15% Removal of cumulative score Snapshot change-Summer to Spring testers Retesters count over multiple years Released test items in 2012, 2013

8. Mandatory Sampling Data file (who will test) Sending Receiving Live testing mixed with mandatory sampling Makeup testing

9. Storing Student EOC Information: Multiple Retakes Which Passing Standard? 4x4 Graduation Plan vs. HB 5 Students who took Algebra I out of state Field Test Results with Other Test Results

10. Accelerated Instruction: District required to provide for all students not achieving Level 2 on EOC How to notify student in a timely manner? How can we remediate with students when we do not yet receive detailed results? TEA: “Sufficient funding exists”

13. EOC MathTAKS Math Obj_score_m ath1 raw_score_m athm_obj1m_raw EOC math Obj_score_m ath1 Pearson Correlation 1.793 **.315 **.503 ** Sig. (2-tailed).000 N2035184915591537 Obj_score_ math7 N243 242240 raw_score_m ath Pearson Correlation.793 ** 1.369 **.582 ** Sig. (2-tailed).000 N1849 13741358 TAKS Math m_obj1Pearson Correlation.315 **.369 ** 1.687 ** m_rawPearson Correlation.503 **.582 **.687 ** 1 Sig. (2-tailed).000 N153713583720 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

15. District and State Results: EOC 2011-12 StateHumble Students 3335402880 Average Scale 39024022 Level I not min 9.8% 4.3% Level I minimum 7.5% 4.3% Level II 66.0% 68.6% Level III 16.7% 22.7%

17. 9 th grade 8 th grade Level II 2012 86.8% 99.4% Level II 2013 78.4% 99.3% Level III 2012 9.2% 46.3% Level III 2013 5.9% 45.1%

20. State (all students) Failing TAKS 10% but 17.3 % below Level II District (all students) Failing TAKS at 2.4% but 8.6% below Level II

22. June 2013© Moak, Casey and Associates22 Source: TEA, http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/index.html Target = 50Target = 5 th Percentile Target = 55Target = 75

23. Index 1: All students 50% at Level II Index 2: Top 95% of campuses have students that make progress Index 3: Lowest 3 groups in 2012 are at 55% in 2013 Index 4: Final Level 2+Grad>150

24. EOC Algebra: part of Index 1,2,3,4 MS Algebra success—eliminated HS success?

25. Increased phase in standards New EOC teaching materials Accelerated instruction each time Accountability by class period Value-added model: teacher name to student

27. June 2013© Moak, Casey and Associates27 Source: TEA - 2013 Accountability Manual

28. High stakes in middle school? Summer school/Accelerated instruction Additional testing Graduation type: 4x4 vs. HB 5

29. AYP, State Accountability HS Math courses: how many, which? Money-Summer school/accelerated instruction budget

30. Contact information Warren Roane, Director of Accountability warren.roane@humble.k12.tx.us Mary Kay Gianoutsos, Assistant Director of Data Quality marykay.gianoutsos@humble.k12.tx.us

31. PowerPoint Information http://www.humbleisd.net/Page/38302