1. 1 Climate Change Adaptation Initiatives – Assessing the Vulnerability of Infrastructure: Tools Background on the PIEVC Project APEGGA-Engineers Canada Workshop APEGGA Annual Conference 2010 Edmonton, AB April 16, 2010 David Lapp, P.Eng. Manager, Professional Practice PIEVC Secretariat Engineers Canada

2. 2 Infrastructure and Climate Change Because of changing climates, past climate may no longer be a good indicator of future climate Existing infrastructure is designed based on historical design values, typically with conservative safety factors Climatic design values based on historical data will be less and less helpful over time However, knowledge of the past is essential to understand risks of future climate changes Shifts in extremes will increase damage and destruction of infrastructure

3. 3 Design life-appropriate assessment StructuresExpected Lifecycle Houses/ Buildings Retrofit/alterations 15-20 yrs Demolition 50-100 yrs Storm/Sanitary Sewer Base system 100 yrs Major upgrade 50 yrs Components 25 – 50 yrs Dams/ Water Supply Base system 50-100 yrs Refurbishment 20-30 yrs Reconstruction 50 yrs Roads & Bridges Road surface 10 - 20 yrs Bridges 50 - 100 yrs Maintenance annually Resurface concrete 20-25 yrs Reconstruction 50-100 yrs Design life varies Component-based vulnerability assessment Safety / economics / technical There is adaptive capacity because of maintenance & rehabilitation Conversely, poor maintenance and lack of rehabilitation contributes to vulnerability

4. 4 Need for a Climate Change Infrastructure Vulnerability Study  Engineers need to understand climate change risks and account for it in design and retrofitting of Canadian public infrastructure  Minimize the risk of destruction, disruption or deterioration of civil infrastructure due to changing climatic conditions  Develop and/or revise policies, standards and tools to guide professional engineers in their day-to-day practice

5. 5 Public Infrastructure Engineering Vulnerability Committee (PIEVC)  Oversee a national engineering assessment of the vulnerability of public infrastructure to climate change in Canada  Facilitate the development of best engineering practices that adapt to climate change impacts  Recommend reviews of infrastructure codes and standards  Partnership between Engineers Canada and Natural Resources Canada

6. 6 PIEVC Membership  Engineers Canada  NRCan  Transport Canada  Environment Canada  Infrastructure Canada  Public Works and Government Services Canada  National Research Council  Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation  NWT Department of Public Works and Services  Government of Newfoundland and Labrador  Institute of Catastrophic Loss Reduction  Canadian Standards Association  Federation of Canadian Municipalities  Municipality of Portage la Prairie  City of Toronto  City of Delta, BC  City of Calgary  Ontario Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure  Ouranos

7. 7 Infrastructure Categories  Buildings  Roads and Associated Structures  Water Resources (water supply and water management structures)  Stormwater and Wastewater Systems

8. 8 Phase II Case Studies Thermosyphon Foundations Quesnell Bridge Edmonton Vancouver Sewerage Area Portage la Prairie Water Treatment Plant Placentia Water Resources Ottawa Buildings Sudbury Roads & Accessories Water resources systems Storm & waste water systems Roads & bridges Buildings

9. 9 National Engineering Vulnerability Assessment Project – Phase III PIEVC Engineering Protocol enhancements More case studies (12 to 15) across Canada in the four infrastructure categories and develop a knowledge library Communications and outreach program with the engineering community, governments, other professional and industry associations in Canada and internationally Training workshops for engineers and geoscientists and other professionals Recommendations on reviews of infrastructure codes, standards and engineering practices Complete by October 31, 2011

10. 10 PIEVC Case Study Process Owner signs license agreement with Engineers Canada to use Protocol Financial and administrative details handled through a Memorandum of Agreement Project advisory committee through the PIEVC Secretariat Case studies take about 6 -8 months to complete Cost - 60-80K depending on scope of infrastructure being assessed

11. 11 Benefits of Infrastructure Climate Risk Assessment – A Tool for Engineers Identify nature and severity of risks to components Optimize more detailed engineering analysis Quick identification of most obvious vulnerabilities Structured, documented approach ensures consistency and accountability – due diligence Adjustments to design, operations and maintenance Application to new designs, retrofitting, rehabilitation and operations and maintenance Reviews and adjustments of codes, standards and engineering practices