Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGladys Baldwin Modified over 9 years ago
1
Seismological observations Earth’s deep interior, and their geodynamical and mineral physical interpretation Arwen Deuss, Jennifer Andrews University of Cambridge, UK John Woodhouse University of Oxford, UK
2
Global tomography Velocity heterogeneity in the Earth: * thermal in origin? * also chemical/compositional heterogeneity? * lithosphere/asthenosphere boundary? * what happens in the transition zone? * where do slabs go? Ritsema, van Heijst & Woodhouse (1999)
3
Mantle discontinuities mineral physics Seismology seismology (Deuss & Woodhouse, GRL, 2002)
4
Two different data types … * reflected waves * both continents and oceans * converted waves * only beneath stations
5
Transition zone Precursors SS precursors: * 410 and 660km visible in all PP precursors: * 410km always visible * 660km visible in some regions
6
660-km discontinuity Precursors Clear reflections from 660 km depth in PP precursors (Deuss et al., Science, 2006)
7
660-km discontinuity Precursors Long period: single peaks Short period: double peaks
8
Transition zone Receiver functions * Receiver functions also show complex structure of 660km, while 410km discontinuity is simple * No 520 km discontinuity Single peak at 660Double peaks at 660
9
Mineral physics: 660 km discontinuity For pyrolite mantle composition (after Hirose, 2001)
10
Application: mantle plumes Modified from http://www.mantleplumes.org
11
Application: mantle plumes (Deuss, P 4, in press, 2007) Mantle plumes are characterised by deep 410, in combination with both deep or shallow 660 (dependent on temperature) Using SS precursors in plume locations from Courtillot et al, 2003
12
520-km discontinuity Precursors (Deuss & Woodhouse, Science, 2001) Splitting of 520-km discontinuity * more complicated than just olivine * garnet phase change? trace elements?
13
Splitting observations 520 km discontinuity * no correlation with tectonic features
14
Mineral physics: 520 km discontinuity Pyrolite phase diagram * high Fe-content: no transition * wet conditions: much sharper * low Ca-content: no gt-CaPv transition
15
But: there is more … SS precursors Receiver functions In addition to transition zone: * Reflectors at 220, 260 and 320 km in the upper mantle * Continuous range of scatterers in the lower mantle
16
Upper mantle Precursors
17
Upper mantle Clapeyron slopes (Deuss & Woodhouse, EPSL (2004)) Lehmann discontinuity: mainly negative Clapeyron slopes
18
Upper mantle Mineral physics Phase transitions: * Coesite –Stishovite, 250-300 km depth, dP/dT=2.5-3.1 250-300 km depth, dP/dT=2.5-3.1 * Orthoenstatite – High clinoenstatite, 250-300 km depth, dP/dT=1.4 250-300 km depth, dP/dT=1.4 Change in deformation mechanism: * Dislocation-diffusion creep dry: 340-380 km depth, dP/dT=-2.4 dry: 340-380 km depth, dP/dT=-2.4 wet: 240-280 km depth, dP/dT=-2.4 Karato (1993) wet: 240-280 km depth, dP/dT=-2.4 Karato (1993)
19
Lower mantle Precursors Stack for North America (Deuss & Woodhouse, GRL, 2002) 220 800 1050 1150 410 520 660
20
Lower mantle Precursors Stack for Indonesia (Deuss & Woodhouse, GRL, 2002) 220 1050 1150 410 660 520
21
Lower mantle 800-900km * in different regions, both continental and oceanic
22
Lower mantle 1000-1200 km * mainly in subduction zone areas related to slabs?
23
Lower mantle – Mineral physics Phase transitions * stishovite -> CaCl2-type (in SiO 2 ) free silica? * (Mg,Fe)SiO 3 perovskite, orthorhombic -> cubic phase unlikely! orthorhombic -> cubic phase unlikely!Others * change in chemical composition? * change in deformation mechanism? * MORB heterogeneity, mechanical mixture?
24
Conclusions * to explain the seismic observations of transition zone discontinuities, we need phase transitions in garnet in addition to the olivine phase transitions (consistent with a pyrolite mantle model ) * lateral variations in minor elements are also required, which will influence slab penetration and upwelling of mantle plumes differently from region to region * significant amount of seismic scatterers in upper and lower mantle, without a mineral physical explanation in the lower mantle * focus research towards discoveries in mineral physics, i.e. discontinuities in attenuation, free silica lower mantle, mechanical mixture vs. equilibrium
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.