1. Introduction to PBIS in Wisconsin Schools: Building a Successful Process Marla Dewhirst marla.r.dewhirst@gmail.commarla.r.dewhirst@gmail.com Wausau Public Schools A-1 August 17 10:15 am

2. Goals Why: Define the rationale for implementation of PBIS What: Define the core features of PBIS How: Define the process for implementing PBIS Implications: For teachers, families, administrator

3. Why SWPBIS? The fundamental purpose of SWPBIS is to make schools more effective, efficient and equitable learning environments. Predictable Consistent Positive Safe

4. Main Messages Supporting social behavior is central to achieving academic gains. School-wide PBIS is an evidence-based practice for building a positive social culture that will promote both social and academic success. Implementation of any evidence-based practice requires a more coordinated focus than typically expected.

5. Six Basic Recommendations for Implementing PBIS Never stop doing what already works Always look for the smallest change that will produce the largest effect Avoid defining a large number of goals Do a small number of things well Do not add something new without also defining what you will stop doing to make the addition possible.

6. Six Basic Recommendations for Implementing PBIS Collect and use data for decision-making Focus on “core features” and adapt the strategies/practices used to achieve those features so they “fit” your school community, culture, context. Families Students Faculty Fiscal-political structure Establish policy clarity before investing in implementation: Readiness counts. Administrative support 80% of faculty Three year commitment Social behavior is part of mission

7. Main Messages PBIS is a foundation for the next generation of education. Effective (academic, behavior) Equitable (all students succeed) Efficient (time, cost)

8. Experimental Research on SWPBIS Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Thornton, L.A., & Leaf, P.J. (2009). Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10(2), 100-115 Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Bevans, K.B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). The impact of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 462-473. Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133-148. Bradshaw, C.P., Reinke, W. M., Brown, L. D., Bevans, K.B., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). Implementation of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in elementary schools: Observations from a randomized trial. Education & Treatment of Children, 31, 1-26. Bradshaw, C., Waasdorp, T., Leaf. P., (2012 )Effects of School-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on child behavior problems and adjustment. Pediatrics, 130(5) 1136-1145. Horner, R., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A., & Esperanza, J., (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133-145. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42(8), 1-14. Ross, S. W., Endrulat, N. R., & Horner, R. H. (2012). Adult outcomes of school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions. 14(2) 118-128. Waasdorp, T., Bradshaw, C., & Leaf, P., (2012) The Impact of Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on Bullying and Peer Rejection: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial. Archive of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. 2012;166(2):149-156 Bradshaw, C. P., Pas, E. T., Goldweber, A., Rosenberg, M., & Leaf, P. (2012). Integrating schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports with tier 2 coaching to student support teams: The PBISplus Model. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 5(3), 177-193. doi:10.1080/1754730x.2012.707429 Freeman, J., Simonsen, B., McCoach D.B., Sugai, G., Lombardi, A., & Horner, ( submitted) Implementation Effects of School-wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports on Academic, Attendance, and Behavior Outcomes in High Schools. SWPBIS Experimentally Related to: 1.Reduction in problem behavior 2.Increased academic performance 3.Increased attendance 4.Improved perception of safety 5.Reduction in bullying behaviors 6.Improved organizational efficiency 7.Reduction in staff turnover 8.Increased perception of teacher efficacy 9.Improved Social Emotional competence

9. Time Cost of a Discipline Referral (Avg. 45 minutes per incident for student 30 min for Admin 15 min for Teacher) 1000 Referrals/yr 2000 Referrals/yr Administrator Time 500 Hours1000 Hours Teacher Time250 Hours500 Hours Student Time750 Hours1500 Hours Totals1500 Hours3000 Hours

10. Pre PBIS Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

11. What does a reduction of 850 office referrals and 25 suspensions mean? Kennedy Middle School Savings in Administrative time ODR = 15 min Suspension = 45 min 13,875 minutes 231 hours 29, 8-hour days Savings in Student Instructional time ODR = 45 min Suspension = 216 min 43,650 minutes 728 hours 121, 6-hour school days

12. Fundamental Principle Academic Engaged Time (AET) AET predicts student performance better than any other variable, including: IQ Language SES Disability Culture/Race Amount of time students are engaged in quality instruction Includes evidence-based instructional strategies Matched to student context, culture and relevance With student engagement in the process

13. AET Academic Engaged Time (AET) 330 minutes of instruction/day 1650 minutes/week 56,700 minutes/year 15,700 minutes for Reading Minutes are finite in number Loss of minutes=Loss of achievement Minutes are the currency we use for instruction

14. Using PBIS to Achieve Quality, Equity and Efficiency QUALITY: Using what works; Linking Academic and Behavior Supports North Carolina (valued outcomes) Michigan (behavior and literacy supports) Montana (braided academic and behavioral state training) National commitment to Fidelity Measures Building functional logic/ theory/ practice (Sanford) EQUITY: Making schools work for all Scott Ross Russ Skiba Vincent, Cartledge, May & Tobin Bully prevention EFFICIENCY: Working Smarter: Building implementation science into large scale adoption. Using teacher and student time better. Dean Fixsen/ Oregon Dept of Education

16. Academic Engagement StudentsFamiliesSchool Effective Schools

17. High Impact Practices Sponsored by the U.S. Dept. of Education in partnership with United Way Worldwide,National PTA, SEDL, and the Harvard Family Research Project http://www.nationalpirc.org/engagement_webinars/archive-webinar4.html

18. What is School-wide Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS)? School-wide PBIS is: A multi-tiered framework for establishing the social culture and behavioral supports needed for a school to achieve behavioral and academic outcomes for all students. Evidence-based features of SWPBIS Prevention Define and teach positive social expectations Acknowledge positive behavior Arrange consistent consequences for problem behavior On-going collection and use of data for decision-making Continuum of intensive, individual intervention supports. Implementation of the systems that support effective practices

19. Establishing a Social Culture Common Vision/Values Common Language Common Experience MEMBERSHIP

21. School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) The social culture of a school matters. A continuum of supports that begins with the whole school and extends to intensive, wraparound support for individual students and their families. Effective practices with the systems needed for high fidelity and sustainability Multiple tiers of intensity

22. Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT 27 Main Ideas: 1.Invest in prevention first 2.Multiple tiers of support intensity 3.Early/rapid access to support

23. Tier I PBIS Core Features Consequences for Problem Behavior School-wide Expectations System to Acknowledge Behavior Leadership Team Classroom Systems Data and Decision System Bully Prevention Family Engagement Tier I PBIS

24. Tier II PBIS Core Features Increased Level of Feedback Increased Structure Additional instruction on Behavior Tier II, III Leadership Team Increased Intensity of Data Collection Increased Family Engagement Tier II PBIS

25. Tier III PBIS Core Features Individualized Support Assessment Capacity Individual Support Planning Individual Student Team Increased Intensity of Data Collection Increased Family Engagement Tier III PBIS

26. Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

27. Remember that the multiple tiers of support refer to our SUPPORT not Students. Avoid creating a new disability labeling system. Reading Behavior Math Health

28. ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/ Check out Targeted social skills instruction Anger Management Social skills club First Step to Success TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning Check and Connect PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Consistent Consequences Positive reinforcement Classroom Systems Parent engagement Bully Prevention SECONDARY PREVENTION TERTIARY PREVENTION PRIMARY PREVENTION

29. SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior Culturally Relevant Support for Student Behavior OUTCOMES Culturally Equitable Academic & Social Competence Culturally Valid Decision Making School-wide PBIS

30. Outcomes School-wide behavior expectation Class-wide Behavior expectations and routines Academic Success Social Emotional Competence Practices School-wide Instruction on Expectations Class-wide Instruction on Routines Active Supervision Effective Recognition Corrective Consequences Function- based Support Systems Team-based Supportive Leadership Selection, Training, Coaching Multi-tiered Support Policies and funding Data Universal Screening Progress Monitoring Implementation Fidelity

31. Schools using PBIS August, 2014 21,611

32. HOW IS SWPBIS Implemented? Nine Implementation Steps Build commitment Establish implementation team Self-Assess for local adaptation of SWPBS Define and teach expectations Establish system for recognizing positive behavior Establish consequences for problem behavior Establish classroom management structure Consider bully prevention additions Collect and use data for decision-making Establish Tier II and Tier III function-based support for students with more severe support needs.

33. Leadership Team Active Coordination Funding Visibility Political Support TrainingCoachingEvaluation Local School/District Teams/Demonstrations Behavioral Expertise Policy Climate Policy

34. Implementation Stages Exploration Installation Initial Implementation Full Implementation Implementation occurs in stages: Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005 2 – 3 Years

35. Stages of ImplementationFocusStageDescription Exploration/ Adoption Decision regarding commitment to adopting the program/practices and supporting successful implementation. InstallationSet up infrastructure so that successful implementation can take place and be supported. Establish team and data systems, conduct audit, develop plan. Initial Implementation Try out the practices, work out details, learn and improve before expanding to other contexts. Full Implementation Expand the program/practices to other locations, individuals, times- adjust from learning in initial implementation. Continuous Improvement/ Regeneration Make it easier, more efficient. Embed within current practices. Work to do it right! Work to do it better! Should we do it! Steve Goodman

36. PBIS Readiness School improvement plan PBIS Team Administrative support Commitment to 2-3 year process Team meets regularly PBIS self-assessment Faculty introduction to PBIS 80% faculty commitment to social behavior improvement Funding District support (District leadership team and coordinator) PBIS Coach available Team Activity --------------------------------- Complete School Readiness Checklist Identify any actions needed Readiness Checklist

37. Implications For Families: Ask for FBA Expect comprehensive behavior support plan Look for fidelity measures as well as impact measures Implement Individual PBS within Systems-level PBS For Teachers/ Community Support Staff Whole school/agency is unit of intervention (not just individual plans) Use fidelity measures as well as impact measures Adapt to local context For Administrators Train teams not individuals Always provide coaching to support team training Require and use fidelity measures as well as impact measures PBS is both effective and efficient when done as intended

38. Support Material for Session PBIS Staff Handbook (Elem and HS) Lincoln New Student Manual Lincoln Flow Chart School Readiness Checklist Team Implementation Checklist (TIC 3.1 Action Plan)

39. Exemplar: Wausau Public Schools Julie Schell is from Lincoln Elementary School Anne Young and Cassie Cerny are from GD Jones Elementary

40. PBIS Effective Efficient Practices that work Practices that are practical, durable and available Equitable Practices that benefit all