1. REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON CHEMICAL HAZARD COMMUNICATION AND GHS IMPLEMENTATION, MANILA, 17 – 20 TH OCTOBER 2005 PRESENTATION BY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION OF PENANG (CAP)

2. Introduction Synthetic chemicals have taken over our lives in many areas. Pesticides, weed killers, food additives, pharmaceuticals, dyes, …… the list is staggering.

3. Introduction (cont.) The dangers in the preparation and consumption of chemicals are well-known. They affect health. Chemicals are leaving extensive toxic waste, which needs storage and disposal.

4. Introduction (cont.) Chemical are seeping into our water systems and contaminating them. Chemicals are being used on animals and are finding their way into the food chain. Chemicals are affecting soil texture.

5. Introduction (cont.) We note phrases like “Such a labelling system should not lead to the imposition of unjustified trade barriers”.

6. Introduction (cont.) What happens when a chemical is deemed more hazardous in one country, and not so hazardous, in another? Will those who subscribe to GHS be forced to accept lower standards of classification and labeling, with all its accompanying implications?

7. Introduction (cont.) What happens to the countries that do not agree/comply with the GHS classification and labeling and wish to set higher standards?

8. Discussion CAP would like to see the following happen:

9. Discussion  The long-term aim must be to ban synthetic chemicals, while the short- term measures must be focused on minimising use.

10. Discussion (cont.)

11.  Greatly intensified s tudies on alternatives to synthetic chemicals, with priority given to the most toxic downwards.

12. Discussion (cont.)  There needs to be a system in place that will ensure that all countries are immediately aware of a ban on a dangerous chemical.

13. Discussion (cont.)  The size of the danger warnings on labels should be big enough to be seen. It is no point having a tiny warning tucked away in a small corner of a label. These need to be specified clearly.  50% of the label  Graphics

14. Discussion (cont.)  We can reduce dependence on the use of agricultural chemicals through alternative farming practices – practices like organic farming should be promoted on a wide scale.

15. Conclusion Let our primary focus be on reducing and eliminating the use of synthetic chemicals. Our long-term measures should be aimed at banning and the short-term measures should be to minimise use. Any system initiated should be to achieve these goals.

16. Conclusion (cont.) We should not add more synthetic chemicals to an already exhausting list. Our focus should be on phasing out existing chemicals.

17. Conclusion (cont.) Even more research needs to be initiated quickly to get out of this “chemical” trend and return to natural forms or substances. Alternatives to synthetic chemicals already exist, intensified efforts are needed in this area.

18. Conclusion (cont.) Do not embark extensively on more systems that divert precious resources and focus away from what we should be doing. These measures will simply lull us into a false sense of security. (END)

19. THANK YOU.