Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTyler Long Modified over 9 years ago
2
1 Efficient Mode Superposition Methods for Non-Classically Damped System Sang-Won Cho, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Ju-Won Oh, Professor, Hannam University, Korea In-Won Lee, Professor, KAIST, Korea 12th KKNN Seminar Taejon, Korea, Aug. 20-22, 1999
3
2 Introduction Mode Superposition Methods for Classically Damped System Mode Superposition Methods for Non-Classically Damped System Numerical Examples Conclusions CONTENTS
4
3 Dynamic Equations of Motion where M:Mass matrix of order n C:Damping matrix of order n K:Stiffness matrix of order n u(t):Displacement vector R 0 :Invariant spatial portion of input load r(t):Time varying portion of input load (1)INTRODUTION
5
4 Methods of Dynamic Analysis Direct integration method Direct integration method -Short duration loading as an impulse Mode superposition method Mode superposition method -Long duration loading as an earthquake Introduction Introduction
6
5 Improved Mode Superposition Methods Mode acceleration (MA) method Mode acceleration (MA) method Modal truncation augmentation (MT) method Modal truncation augmentation (MT) method Limitation of MA and MT methods Applicable only to classically damped systems Applicable only to classically damped systems Introduction Introduction
7
6 Objective To expand MA and MT methods to analyze non-classically damped systems Introduction Introduction
8
7 Previous Studies: Mode Superposition Methods for Classically Damped System
9
8 Mode Displacement (MD) Method Dynamic Equations of Motion Dynamic Equations of Motion Modal Transformation Modal Transformation Modal Equations Modal Equations (1) where (3) (2) Classically Damped System Classically Damped System
10
9 MA Method (Williams, 1945) Displacement Displacement Classically Damped System Classically Damped System where (4)
11
10 MT Method (Dickens & Wilson, 1980) Displacement Displacement (5) Classically Damped System Classically Damped System where P: MT vector : modal displacement
12
11 - For P - For P - For, solve - For, solve (6) Classically Damped System Classically Damped System (9) (7) (8)
13
12 Classically Damped System Classically Damped System Summary
14
13 This Study: Mode Superposition Methods for Non-Classically Damped System
15
14 Non-Classically Damped System Dynamic Equations of Motion Dynamic Equations of Motion State Space Equations State Space Equations (1) Non-Classically Damped System Non-Classically Damped System (10) where Eigenvalue Problem Eigenvalue Problem where and : complex conjugate pairs (11)
16
15 MD Method State Space Equations State Space Equations Modal Transformation Modal Transformation Modal Equations Modal Equations (10) (12) (13) Non-Classically Damped System Non-Classically Damped System
17
16 MA Method Displacement Displacement (14) Non-Classically Damped System Non-Classically Damped System where
18
17 MT Method Displacement Displacement (15) Non-Classically Damped System Non-Classically Damped System where : MT vector : modal displacement
19
18 -For -For, solve Non-Classically Damped System Non-Classically Damped System (16) (19) (17) (18)
20
19 Stability of MT method Stability of MT method -Modal equation -Solution ( r(t) = sin ( t), z(0)=0 ) -Stability condition (19) (21) where (20) Non-Classically Damped System Non-Classically Damped System
21
20 Characteristics of MT Solution Characteristics of MT Solution -Solution -Property of -Simplification (19) (22) (23) Non-Classically Damped System Non-Classically Damped System
22
21 Comparison MT Solution with MA Solution Comparison MT Solution with MA Solution -MT solution -MA solution -Coefficient of MT solution (24) (25) Non-Classically Damped System Non-Classically Damped System (26) where (27)
23
22 Non-Classically Damped System Non-Classically Damped System Summary
24
23 Structures Cantilever Beam with Lumped Dampers Cantilever Beam with Lumped Dampers -To compare the MA and MT methods with MD method 10-Story Shear Building 10-Story Shear Building -To show the divergent case of MT method NUMERICAL EXAMPLES
25
24 Cantilever Beam with Lumped Dampers El-Centro Earthquake El-Centro Earthquake 1 2 3 9 10 11 100 IN Fig. 1 Beam Configuration E = 3.0 10 7 L = 100 A = 4 C = 0.1 I = 1.25 = 7.41 10 -4 10 Beam Elements Table 1 Eigenvalues Numerical Examples Numerical Examples
26
25 Moment at Each Node Moment at Each Node MD Method MA & MT Methods M m / M d 1 2 3 910 11 4 56 7 8 Node Number 1 2 3 910 11 4 56 7 8 Numerical Examples Numerical Examples M m : Moment by mode superposition methods M d : Moment by direct integration method
27
26 Shear Force at Each Node Shear Force at Each Node MD Method MA & MT Methods 1 2 3 910 11 4 56 7 8 Node Number 1 2 3 910 11 4 56 7 8 Numerical Examples Numerical Examples S m / S d S m : Shear force by mode superposition methods S d : Shear force by direct integration method
28
27 10-Story Shear Building Harmonic Loading ( = 32.0 rad/sec ) Harmonic Loading ( = 32.0 rad/sec ) m 1 =1K sec 2 /IN m 2 =2 k 1 =800 K/IN k 2 =1600 m 3 =2 m 4 =2 m 5 =3 m 6 =3 m 7 =3 m 8 =4 m 9 =4 m 10 =4 Fig. 2 10-Story Shear Building Table 2 Eigenvalues Load Case 2 Load Case 1 Numerical Examples Numerical Examples
29
28 Load Case 1 Load Case 1 MA Method MT Method Displacement MA and MT solutions are same Time (sec ) Numerical Examples Numerical Examples
30
29 Displacement Load Case 2 Load Case 2 MT method gives no solution MA Method MT Method Time (sec ) Numerical Examples Numerical Examples No solution
31
30 Expanded MA and MT methods were applied to non-classically damped system. Expanded MA and MT methods were applied to non-classically damped system. MA method is stable, MA method is stable, whereas MT method is conditionally stable. MT method gives same results with MA method MT method gives same results with MA method when MT method is stable. CONCLUSIONS
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.