Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Review

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Review"— Presentation transcript:

1 Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Review
Your group must read each statement then… If it sounds like something a Federalists would have said to support the Constitution, put it in one group. If it sounds like something an Anti-Federalist would have said to complain about the Constitution, put it in another group.

2 The Constitution

3 Constitution Definition? Sets the broad rules of the game
A constitution is a nation’s basic law. It creates political institutions, assigns or divides powers in government, and often provides certain guarantees to citizens. Sets the broad rules of the game The rules are not neutral; some participants and policy options have advantages over others.

4 Part I- The Origins of the Constitution

5 Jefferson stepping on Adams’ toe.

6 Origins of the Constitution
The English Heritage: The Power of Ideas Natural rights: rights inherent in human beings, not dependent on government Natural Law: liberties not based on generosity of the king but on a “higher law” Consent of the governed: government derives its authority by sanction of the people Limited Government: certain restrictions should be placed on government to protect natural rights of citizens Revolt about liberty, not economics!

7 Natural Law Rights, “…are born with us; exist with us; and cannot be taken away from us by any human power.” -John Dickinson-

8 Locke- Two Treatises on Government
People had the right to life, liberty, and property. Rulers were expected to preserve these rights. Individual rights were more important than the laws and governments. “unalienable rights” Absolute rulers went against human nature and should be overthrown. “right to revolution” A book that Locke has written. The first one kinda laughs at the idea of the Divine right of Kings.

9 Locke on the state of nature and consent of the governed
“The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which treats everyone equally…Being equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, or possessions.” “We have reason to conclude that all peaceful beginnings of government have been laid in the consent of the people.”

10 Locke and The Declaration of Independence

11 Origins of the Constitution
The French Heritage: The Power of Ideas Separation of Powers: the principle of dividing the powers of a government among different branches to guard against abuse of authority. Montesquieu- The Spirit of the Laws Argued for division of power between branches of government. Said this would protect the government from becoming corrupt CHECKS AND BALANCES!!!

12 Montesquieu on Separation of Powers
“When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner.”

13 Classical view of a model republic Enlightenment Thinking
Govt. gets its authority from the citizens. A selfless, educated citizenry. Elections should be frequent. Govt. should guarantee individual rights & freedoms. Govt.’s power should be limited [checks & balances]. The need for a written Constitution. “E Pluribus Unum.” [“Out of many, one”] Classical view of a model republic Enlightenment Thinking The “Virtuous Republic” Ideal citizen [Cincinnatus] “City on a hill” [John Winthrop] -- What sort of virtue would this new republic have?? They were so happy that they had beat this european tyrant they wanted to have good virtues

14 Part II- Writing the Constitution

15 The Final Product

16 Principles Popular Sovereignty Limited Government Separation of Powers
Checks and Balances Federalism Judicial Review

17 Separation of Powers

18 The Electoral College (Article II)
“Winner take all” feature has many implications for Presidential races. How affect campaigns? Resource allocation Issues (appeal to voter bloc in specific state) Choice of a vice president

19 How affect third parties?
May get much popular vote, but if not a majority they cannot get electoral votes. The fact that they may not win hampers their ability to raise money and gain other campaign resources.

20 Electoral College Why has it not been abolished?
Helps ensure that a majority of electoral votes are earned by one candidate. History/tradition Would require a constitutional amendment No clear consensus on an alternative Collectively benefits small states Racial minorities in some states like the electoral college because it protects their votes. Collectively it benefits the large states Competitive states like it Favors a two-party system

21 Article IV: Federalism
This article more clearly defines the relationship between the states and the federal government. It includes the “full faith and credit” clause States that an act or judicial proceeding of one state must be honored in all other states. Respect the laws! Must recognize other states laws even if they are not valid in your state! Cannot discriminate against citizens of another state – a state can’t prohibit an Arizona person from working in New Mexico Also, if a fugitive flees to another state, that state has to take him/her back to original state. Cannot create a new state within a state …make denver a separate state (inside of colorado)

22 Article V: The Amendment Process
This article defines the process for making changes to the original Constitution. To make a change the following must occur: 2/3rds of the Senate approves (67 of 100) 2/3rds of the House approves (290 of 435) OR 2/3rds of the States call for a convention (34 of 50) The process is a clear depiction of federalism.

23 Article VI: The Supremacy Clause
This article clearly states that national law will be supreme over state law. IF there’s any conflicts between state and federal law, federal law prevails!!

24 Article VII: Ratification Procedures
9 of 13 colonies had to approve

25 ASSIGNMENT Complete “Separating the Powers: An Exercise in Three” with a partner You are competing with the other groups in class to get your paper filled out the quickest.

26 Discussion of “Separating the Powers: An Exercise in Three”
Whose powers are listed in: Article I? Article II? Article III?

27 Ratification Debates

28 Need to Know About Ratification Debates…
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalists (who were they?) Federalist Papers Bill of Rights

29 Ratifying the Constitution

30 Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists
In your group, categorize the sheets of papers into two sections. Section of things that a Federalists WOULD have said to SUPPORT the constitution Section of things that an Anti-Federalists WOULD have said to COMPLAIN about the constitution

31 Ratifying the Constitution

32 Ratifying the Constitution
Ratification Lacking majority support, the Federalists specified that the Constitution be ratified by state conventions, not state legislatures. Delaware first ratified the Constitution on December 7, 1787. New Hampshire’s approval (the ninth state to ratify) made the Constitution official six months later.

33 The Amendment Process

34 ASSIGNMENT #4 With a partner, complete the activity called “Amending the Constitution” and complete Parts A and B

35 The Constitution and the Amendment Process
Methods of Proposal Methods of Ratification Usual Method Method 1 By 2/3 vote in both the House and the Senate Method 1 By legislatures in ¾ of the states (38 states) [26 of 27 cases, this has been the method] Or Or Method 2 By national constitutional convention called by Congress at the request of 2/3 of the state legislatures [This method has never been used] Method 2 Ratified through conventions in ¾ of the states. [Only been used once to ratify the 21st Amendment]

36 Constitutional Change
The Informal Process of Constitutional Change Judicial Interpretation Marbury v. Madison (1803): judicial review Changing Political Practice Technology Increasing Demands on Policymakers

37 The Importance of Flexibility
The Constitution is short, with fewer than 8,000 words. It does not prescribe every detail. The Constitution is not static, but flexible for future generations to determine their own needs.

38 The Constitutional Convention

39 DISCUSSION Who was excluded from the convention?
Implications of these exclusions? It did not reflect the needs of all Americans, but expressed the views of the signers who wanted to establish a stable and prosperous nation.

40 James Madison “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this; you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” What principles of government can we derive from what Madison is saying here?

41 The Agenda in Philadelphia
3 Major Issues: Equality Issues Economic Issues Individual Rights Issues

42 Equality Issues Need to Know: Virginia Plan vs. New Jersey Plan
Connecticut Compromise Problems and Solutions related to slavery and voting

43 Economic Issues Problem:
States had tariffs on products from other states Paper money was basically worthless Congress couldn’t raise money Solution: Powers of Congress to be strengthened Powers of states to be limited

44

45 Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise
Economic Issues Problem: Congress and the power to regulate foreign and interstate trade Solution: Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise Congress was forbidden from taxing exports from any state and from interfering in the slave trade for at least 20 years.

46 The Individual Rights Issues
Some were written into the Constitution: Prohibits suspension of writ of habeas corpus No bills of attainder No ex post facto laws Religious qualifications for holding office prohibited Strict rules of evidence for conviction of treason Right to trial by jury in criminal cases Some were not specified Freedom of speech and expression Rights of the accused

47 Look on page ______. List and describe (briefly) the 4 underlying principles of the Constitution


Download ppt "Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Review"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google