2. 1 Flash Floods: Defining and Forecasting Matt Kelsch COMAP Symposium 02-1, 02-2 Heavy Precip/Flash Flood October 2001 kelsch@comet.ucar.edu Fort Collins, CO 28 July 1997

3. 2 Defining hazardous weather phenomena Severe Weather: Hail size: ¾ inch Wind Speed: 58 mph Tornado Hurricane: 74 mph sustained winds Hurricane Floyd, Sep 1999

4. 3 Defining hazardous weather phenomena FLASH FLOOD: Rainfall: 2-20 inches Stream Level: 1-20 feet above bankfull Time lag from rainfall to flood: 15 min- 6 hours NWS currently claims an average of 52-min lead time on warnings

5. 4 Defining a flash flood (NWS) A flood which follows within a few hours (usually less than 6 hours) of heavy or excessive rainfall, dam or levee failure, or the sudden release of water impounded by an ice jam. An Urban Flood Advisory is issued to cover non life-threatening flooding of streets and low-lying areas (such as underpasses). If the flood should become life threatening, then it is considered a flash flood Aftermath of 9 June 1972 flash flood in Rapid City, SD

6. 5 Defining a Flash Flood : (from the NATO Advanced Study Institute, “Coping With Flash Floods,” November 1999 in Ravello Italy A flood in which the causative rainfall and subsequent runoff are occurring on the same time and space scales. Impact related to the sudden increase in water momentum, rather than the final depth, velocity, or extent of floodwater. MANY ARE NOT A “WALL OF WATER”

7. Avg ~5 in/hr Avg ~8 in/hr Accum.: 2-20+ inches Basin Size: 5-50 miles 2, avg=18 miles 2 Rainfall Rates: 3-12 inches/hr

8. 7

9. 8 Typical Basin Characteristics of Flash Floods Small, fast response Almost all <30 miles 2 Enhanced by steep slopes Urbanization Deforestation, fire scars Flood Control **Detention Ponds** **Channelization** Know your flood control agencies Cheyenne, WY, after flash flood and hailstorm, 1 August 1985

10. 1-h Accumulation, 12 July 1996 Purples=50-75mm  Fire Scar Buffalo Creek, CO, flash flood

11. Damage from 12 July 1996 flash flood that occurred just downstream of a fire scar. Buffalo Creek, Colorado

12. 11 Issues With Flash Flood Warnings Improvements have occurred mainly in the Flash Flood Watch stage since the 1970’s, but there are two ways in which warnings are sometimes inadequate: 1) In an attempt to ensure everyone in the threat area is warned, long-duration warnings are issued for large areas 2) In a conscientious attempt to provide specific detail in space and time, there is little or no lead time because the detailed guidance often requires reports of the flood Better hydrologic tools and more specific 1-6h QPF are necessary to improve the Flash Flood Warning stage

13. IT DOESN’T HAVE TO ROTATE TO KILL YA!

18. 17 Flash Floods: Defining and Forecasting Precipitation Intensity, Duration, Area Need better 1-6h QPF Hydrologic Response Understand Hydrology –Altered Basins –Natural Basins Better, high-res tools Interagency Communications *Need to come up with a real definition and remember that flash floods are not just a precipitation issue Cheyenne, WY after flash flood on 1 August 1985

19. 18 Flash Floods: Forecasting and Decision Making for more information from COMET residence training you can view flash flood material presented at AMS meetings and the WDM workshops in 2001, or from the COMAP Symposia on Flash Floods in 2000: http://www.comet.ucar.edu/presentations/index.htm http://www.comet.ucar.edu/class/comap_symposium/index.htm for more information on the Fort Collins flash flood and a detailed case summary with links: www.comet.ucar.edu/resources/cases/c11_28jul97/lab1.htm http://meted.ucar.edu/qpf/urbanf/indexm.htm link to our Venezuela flash flood and landslide page: http://www.comet.ucar.edu/resources/cases/venezuela/index.htm

20. 19 The Fort Collins, Colorado (USA) Flash Flood of 28 July 1997 Terrain-locked thunderstorm system increased rainfall duration Unusual maritime-tropical characteristics increased rainfall efficiency Orographic influences increased rainfall prodcution Urbanization increased hydrologic response (volume and speed of runoff) Flood control structures increased runoff complexity

21. 0000 UTC 29 July 1997 ETA 500 mb

22. 0100 UTC

23. 700 hPa wind and dewpoint, 0000 UTC 29 july 1997

24. Radar accumulation at 0430 UTC 29 July 1997

25. 24 Timetable of Flood Events 5:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:40 10:30 11:00 1:20 Rain begins EOC Activated Ponds Overflowing, rapid water rescues begin Most intense rain commences NWS Warning Storm begins to dissipate and move northeast Trailer Park Flooding, Fires, Train Derailment Declared City Disaster

28. October 1999 Hydromet class at Spring Creek