1. The Evolving Repository Landscape: Identifying Motivations for Library DAMS Migration Ayla Stein Metadata Librarian University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Santi Thompson Head of Digital Repository Services University of Houston Libraries

2. Presentation Overview ◈ Background ◈ Literature Review ◈ Methodology ◈ Results ◈ Discussion ◈ Lessons Learned & Next Steps ◈ Conclusion Goydenko Liudmila/gettyimages

3. Why do this study?

4. Research Questions ◈ What motivations prompt institutions to migrate from one DAMS to another? ◈ In what directions are institutions moving? For example, are institutions moving from proprietary systems to open source systems?

5. Literature Review ◈ Selecting Initial DAMS ◈ Policy & Planning ◈ Evaluation Criteria ◈ Needs Assessments ◈ Case studies on DAMS Migration ◈ Dissatisfactions ◈ Wants & Needs

6. Methodology ◈ Eligibility ◈ Evaluation topics ◈ Topic selection ◈ Survey design

7. Eligibility ◈ Respondents have completed the migration process from the “Old DAMS" to the "New DAMS“ ◈ Respondents are currently migrating from the “Old DAMS” to the “New DAMS“ ◈ Respondents have selected a “New DAMS” but have not started the migration process

8. Evaluation Topics ◈ Implementation & Day-to- Day Costs ◈ User Administration ◈ Organizational Viability ◈ Technical Support ◈ System Administration ◈ Extensibility ◈ Information Retrieval & Access ◈ Content Management ◈ Preservation ◈ User Interface Customization ◈ Interoperability ◈ Reputation ◈ Metadata Standards

9. Survey Design ◈ Question Formats ◈ Demographic information ◈ System Movement ◈ Selection & Ranking of Motivations

10. Results Overview ◈ Survey Demographics ◈ Top 5 Topics ◈ Priority Rankings ◈ Highlights from Top 5 Topics - Visualized

15. Priority Rank ◈ Rank 1: Implementation, Preservation, Extensibility ◈ Rank 2: User Customization, Content Management, Technical Support ◈ Rank 3: Content Management, Extensibility ◈ Rank 4: Content Management, Preservation, Information Retrieval, System Administration ◈ Rank 5: Metadata Standards, Technical Support, User Interface, Interoperability

16. Content Management Results

17. Metadata Results

18. Extensibility Results

19. Preservation Results

20. UI Customization Results

21. Technical Support Results

22. Discussion ◈ What needs and/or factors prompt institutions to migrate? ◈ What “direction” are institutions migrating? ◈ Overall theme

23. Self Control ◈ Content Management: Scalability ◈ Metadata: Multiple Schema & Flexibility ◈ Extensibility: Local Development ◈ UI Customization: Local Design Decisions

24. Third Party Support ◈ Technical Support: a role for governing organizations, vendors, and communities

25. Inconclusive ◈ Digital Preservation: Contradictory Results

26. System Movement

27. Limitations & Next Steps ◈ Limitations ◈ Future Research ◈ Institutional/ Data Repositories

29. Works Cited ◈ California Digital Library, “Glossary” (2014) Retrieved March 30, 2015 from http://www.cdlib.org/gateways/technology/glossary.html http://www.cdlib.org/gateways/technology/glossary.html

30. Images Cited 1. By Kathryn Greenhill [CC BY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons 2. All other images used courtesy of gettyimages http://www.gettyimages.com/licenseinfo http://www.gettyimages.com/licenseinfo 3. Charts created by Ayla Stein and Santi Thompson