Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GDM- why it is important.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "GDM- why it is important."— Presentation transcript:

1 GDM- why it is important.
Professor Fidelma Dunne MD PhD FRCP FRCPI Consultant Endocrinologist Saolta University Hospital Group and National University of Ireland Galway Ireland.

2 Gestational Diabetes (GDM)
GDM detects an at-risk pregnancy for mother. GDM detects an at risk pregnancy for the infant. GDM is associated with increased future maternal life-time risk of Type 2 DM (50%). GDM is associated with increased rates of obesity and pre- diabetes in adolescents and type 2 DM in adult life of the offspring. DIABETES BEGETS DIABETES.

3 Why are we concerned about GDM?
Mother Infant PIH/PET CS delivery Future Diabetes Obesity MetS/CVS Macrosomia. Hypoglycaemia/NNU Future Diabetes Future Obesity Autism Fatty Liver School Institute Name to go here

4 What global factors are contributing to increased GDM prevalence?
Prevalence of Type 2 DM; NHANES 4.6% (18-44 y). Prevalence of pre-diabetes NHANES 26.4% (18-44 y). Prevalence of Obesity, 20-30% global estimates. Rising maternal age for pregnancy. School Institute Name to go here

5 GDM- Can we make a difference?
Screening is easy and not costly. Interventions are low key for the majority. Treatments make a difference. Future maternal Type 2 DM can be prevented. Future maternal CVS risk can be addressed. Family health can influence offspring health. School Institute Name to go here

6 6 6

7 Macrosomia

8

9

10

11

12 Who should we screen? How should we screen?

13 Who? Universal Selective School Institute Name to go here

14 How? IADPSG/ WHO 2014---Perinatal outcomes
Carpenter & Coustan--- Future Diabetes Risk NICE Cost School Institute Name to go here

15

16

17

18 Socio-Economic Status
Womens’ addresses were ‘geocoded’. Geocoding = Assigning geographic coordinates (longitude-latitude) to each address.

19 Distance from test hospital
For every 10km required to travel, the probability of attending for screening is reduced by 2% e.g. If you live 50km away from hospital, you are 10% less likely to attend If you like 100km away you are 20% less likely to attend.

20 Deprivation Score Correlation study:
Relative to Deprivation score 1, ie ‘wealthiest’; Score 2: 2.3% less likely to attend p=0.138 Score 3: 4.3% less likely to attend p=0.008 Score 4: 7.6% less likely to attend p=0.0001 Score 5:14.5% less likely to attend p=0.0001

21 School Institute Name to go here

22 Results: Primary v Secondary uptake rates
Secondary care group significantly more likely to attend at their randomised location (p < 0.001) School of Medicine National University of Ireland, Galway

23 Preventing GDM School Institute Name to go here

24 4 individual risk factors
School Institute Name to go here

25 Combining risk factors
School Institute Name to go here

26 School Institute Name to go here

27 Exercise pre-pregnancy
School Institute Name to go here

28 Exercise in early pregnancy
School Institute Name to go here

29 Treatment of GDM? MNT and Exercise (70%) Insulin (30%)
Metformin (NICE) Glibenclamide (ACOG) School Institute Name to go here

30

31

32 Is treatment beneficial?
School Institute Name to go here

33 Shoulder Dystocia School Institute Name to go here

34 Macrosomia School Institute Name to go here

35 Preeclampsia School Institute Name to go here

36 What dietary intervention works?
School Institute Name to go here

37 School Institute Name to go here

38 Diet and Exercise interventions in GDM- does it work?
The Atlantic DIP dataset was utilized: N = 567 women with GDM. (D+E) N = 2499 with NGT.

39 Differences in Characteristics
GDM N = 567 NGT N = 2499 P value Age (mean =/-sd) 33.4 (4.9) 31.5(5.2) <0.01 BMI (mean+/-sd) 30.5 (6.1) 26.7 (4.8) BMI>30 N (%) 279 (49%) 522 (21%) SBP 119.7 (13.3) 116.3 (17.1) School Institute Name to go here

40 Differences in infant size
GDM N =567 NGT N = 2499 P value LGA (>90th C) BMI <25 BMI 25-30 BMI>30 9.4% 10.4% 15.1% 12.2% 16.0% 21.8% 0.4 0.06 0.02 Macrosomia (> 4kg) 7.5% 11.0% 17.6% 16.5% 27.0% 0.01 School Institute Name to go here

41 Composite Poor Neonatal Outcome
OR (CI ) P 0.03 21% less likely to have an adverse outcome School Institute Name to go here

42 Gestational weight gain in GDM?
Is it important? School Institute Name to go here

43 Institute of Medicine Guidelines for Gestational Weight Gain
Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines; Rasmussen KM YA, editors: Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines

44

45 57% women gained excessive weight (n=307).
Contrasts with prior studies in non-diabetic women (33%).1 1. Nohr et al. Am J Clin Nutr, 2008

46

47 Glucophage ? Used in South Africa in Type 2 DM since Perinatal mortality similar. Used extensively with PCOS with no adverse outcomes (Tang 2010). 3 systematic reviews and meta analysis (Gutzin 2003; Gilbert 2006; Juan Gui 2013; favour metformin re GWG, LGA, PIH, PET. Less macrosomia in N/OW women (Ljas 2011). School Institute Name to go here

48 School Institute Name to go here

49 School Institute Name to go here

50 What are the health risks post GDM?
School Institute Name to go here

51

52

53

54

55 Abnormal glucose tolerance status at follow-up
Previous GDM (n=270) Previous NGT (n= 388) p value for difference IFG 12.2% 1.8% IGT 5.9% 1.5% IFG/IGT 5.6% 0.3% DM 2.2% 0% Total 25.9% 3.6% <0.001

56 Comparison of HbA1c and FPG to identify abnormal glucose post partum
Criteria Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity PPV NPV not requiring OGTT N(%) HbA1c 5.7% 45 (32, 59) 84 (78,88) 39 (27,52) 87 (82,91) 206 (78) FPG 5.6 mmol/l 80 (66, 89) 100 (98, 100) (91, 100) 96 (92, 98) 224 (85) HbA1c 5.7% and FPG 5.6mmol/L 90 (78, 96) (78, 88) 56 (45, 66) 97 (94, 99) 184 (70)

57

58 Metabolic syndrome (MetS), obesity and insulin resistance indices at follow-up (mean 2.6 years)

59 Metabolic syndrome components (ATP-III) at follow-up (mean 2.6 years)

60 Feig D. PLOS medicine 2013

61 Can we prevent Type 2 DM? School Institute Name to go here

62 Prevention Type 2 following GDM DPP Aroda VR. JCEM 04/2015
DPP 3 year data; ILS reduced by 53%, metformin by 50% DPP 10 year data; ILS reduced by 35%, metformin by 40% Both ILS and metformin (850mg BD) are effective in reducing progression to Diabetes School Institute Name to go here

63 Preventing Type 2 DM after GDM Bao W. Diabetologia 03/2015 N =1695
Over 18 year F/U period Each 5kg increase in weight after index GDM pregnancy associated with 27% higher risk of T2DM. Postpartum weight management essential School Institute Name to go here

64 School Institute Name to go here

65 65 65

66 Summary GDM is common. Dietary intervention works.
Breast feeding should be encouraged. Diabetes post GDM is a public health concern but can be prevented. Metabolic syndrome and future CVS risk post GDM is a public health concern and requires F/U. A strong screening programme is essential. Integrated care is required. School Institute Name to go here

67


Download ppt "GDM- why it is important."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google