Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/ORACA Risk Analysis Workshop: Advancing Analysis Washington, DC – USDA South Building – June 18, 2013 Janell Kause (FSIS) Sherri Dennis.

Published byLuke Price Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/ORACA Risk Analysis Workshop: Advancing Analysis Washington, DC – USDA South Building – June 18, 2013 Janell Kause (FSIS) Sherri Dennis."— Presentation transcript:

1 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/ORACA Risk Analysis Workshop: Advancing Analysis Washington, DC – USDA South Building – June 18, 2013 Janell Kause (FSIS) Sherri Dennis (FDA) Régis Pouillot (FDA) Dan Gallagher (VA Tech)

2  L. monocytogenes (Lm): 2 nd -3 rd cause of foodborne-disease related death in the US  1450 hospitalizations, 255 deaths per year (Scallan et al. 2011)  Deli meat: 1st ready-to-eat (RTE) food vehicle of Lm  ca. 1,600 cases per year (FDA/FSIS, 2003)  Lm prevalence and Lm levels are higher for in-store packaged than for manufacturer-packaged RTE food  Gombas et al., 2003, NAFSS, 2008  ca. 80% of all listeriosis cases attributed to deli meat are from deli meat sliced and packaged at retail  Endrikat et al., 2010, Pradhan et al. 2010  Hypothesis: at retail  Additional cross-contaminations?  Temperature abuses? 2 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

3  Objective: Ascertain the impact on public health of current practices and potential interventions that reduce or prevent Listeria monocytogenes contamination in ready-to-eat food sliced, prepared and/or packaged in retail facilities 3 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

4  Partnership ◦ USDA/FSIS & FDA/CFSAN  Collaboration ◦ Univ. of Maryland, Cornell Univ., VA Tech  Engagement ◦ Stakeholders early and throughout; > 56 meetings  Innovation ◦ 1 st QMRA to quantitatively link retail practices to public health outcomes Risk Assessment Team Risk Management Team Stakeholders Academics Data needs (call for data) Information (meetings) Scientific Community Literature & Peer review Data Comments RM Questions Scientific Meetings Data Data needs RM questions Preliminary Results 4 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

5 “What is the exposure to Listeria monocytogenes from consuming ready-to- foods prepared in retail facilities?” “What are the key processes that increase ready-to-foods contamination at retails?” “How much is the relative risk per serving reduced according to specific risk management options?” 5 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

6 Further refined; a list of proposed ‘what if’ scenarios to evaluate:  Sanitation  Worker behavior  Growth inhibition  Cross contamination  Storage temperature & duration  Examples  What is the public health impact of temperature abuse in deli cases?  What would be the impact of separated slicers/counters for growth versus non-growth products?  What is the impact of the use of gloves in the retail environment? 6 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

7  Design  Data Sources  Implementation  Modeling Approach  Key Findings 7 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

8 8 Food Meat Cheese Salad Food workers Behavior  Events Sites Slicers Cases Food Contact Surfaces Non Food Contact Surfaces Utensils … Listeria Niches Slicers Cases … June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

9 Example Serve Customer Event 9 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

10 Example: Serve Customer Event Wipe Slicer Removes some bacteria from the slicer (if any) 10 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

11 Example: Serve Customer Event Wipe Slicer Wash hands & change gloves Removes some bacteria from hands (if any). No bacteria on the gloves 11 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

12 Example: Serve Customer Event Wipe Slicer Wash hands & change gloves Potential cross contamination between gloves and case Open case, remove chub, close case 12 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

13 Example: Serve Customer Event Wipe Slicer Wash hands & change gloves Open case, remove chub, close case Slice on gloves Potential cross contamination among gloves, slicer, chub and potential contamination of the product sold 13 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

14 14 Example: Serve Customer Event Wipe Slicer Wash hands & change gloves Open case, remove chub, close case Slice on gloves Touch scale Potential cross contamination between gloves and scale 14 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

15 15 Example: Serve Customer Event Wipe Slicer Wash hands & change gloves Open case, remove chub, close case Slice on gloves Touch scale Rewrap chub Potential cross contamination between the chub and the food contact surface 15 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

16 16 Example: Serve Customer Event Wipe Slicer Wash hands & change gloves Open case, remove chub, close case Slice on gloves Touch scale Rewrap chub Potential cross contamination between the gloves and the case Open case, replace chub, close case 16 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

17 Example: Non Deli Time Event Bacterial growth on products 17 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

18 18 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

19 Dose Response Model Probability of Illness Contamination when sold Contamination when eaten Home Storage (bacterial growth) Serving Size Number of Lm ingested 19 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC (FAO/WHO, 2004)

20  Design  Data Sources  Implementation  Modeling Approach  Key Findings 20 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

21 Funded studiesLiterature sources  Food worker behavior  Lubran MB, et al. (2010) J Food Protection, 73 (10):1849-57  Transfer coefficients and Slicer  Hoelzer K, et al. (2012) International J of Food Microbiology, 157:267-77  Risk mapping  Hoelzer K, et al. (2012) Risk analysis, 32(7): 1139-56  Persistent strains in deli departments  Oliver R. et al. (Cornell Univ./Purdue Univ.) (expected Summer 2013 )  Potential transfer during specific events  Maitland J, et al. (2013) J Food Protection, 76 (2): 272-82  Growth model  Mejholm and Dalgaard, 2009 J Food Prot, 72(10), 2132-2143  Temperature in deli case  Ecosure 2007 (www.FoodRisk.org)  Time/ temperature during transport and at home  Ecosure 2007 (www.FoodRisk.org)  Consumption data  NHANES study, WWEIA data, 1999-2006  Dose response model  FAO/WHO 2004 21

22  Design  Data Sources  Implementation  Modeling Approach  Key Findings 22 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

23 CSV Outputs R model “Blue Meadow” cluster 2,016 cores, 21 TFlops Available through the Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, CDRH - FDA Parallel computing Parameters Excel Data File  Discrete Event model + Few bacteria in the system = Slow convergence  Each simulation: 100 Stores; 1,000,000 Servings  Currently: 22 Scenarios tested, for 6 Baseline Conditions

24  Design  Data Sources  Implementation  Modeling Approach  Key Findings 24 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

25  We evaluated a range of retail delicatessens conditions  Approach  Define some baseline conditions Baseline #1: regular environmental contaminations occur in the stores Baseline #2: no environmental contamination occurs in stores …  Evaluate various scenarios within these baseline conditions 25 May 22 nd, 2013 Interagency Risk Assessment--Listeria monocytogenes in Retail Delicatessens Public Meeting

26 #1: “Multiple Niche 100W” baseline condition Stores with regular L. monocytogenes transfer from the environment and/or niches Incoming L. monocytogenes : from incoming products and from the environment/niche #2: “No Niche” baseline condition Stores without transfer from the environment and/or niche Incoming L. monocytogenes : from incoming products #3: “Incoming Growth Chub” baseline condition Stores with highly contaminated incoming product type that supports growth #4: “Incoming Non-Growth Chub” baseline condition Stores with highly contaminated incoming product type that does not support growth #5: “Temperature Control” baseline condition Stores without transfer from the environment and/or niche and with compliant temperature control (  41°F) #6: “Niche & Temperature Control” baseline condition Stores with regular L. monocytogenes transfer from the environment and/or niches and with compliant temperature control (  41°F) 26 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

27  Within each of the 6 Baseline conditions  22 Scenarios  Answer the question (example):  Given that there is a niche in a retail deli, what are the best mitigation strategies? and not  What is the probability that there is a niche in the store? 27 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

28  Separate slicers / counters for growth versus non growth products?  Model more than one slicer. Select slicer to use each time customer is served based on product type.  What is the impact of the use of “gloves” in the retail environment?  Set probability of wearing gloves to 100%  Consider frequently touched non-food contact surfaces (e.g. case handles, scale touch pads) as food contact surfaces (i.e., required to be cleaned and sanitized every four hours)?  Change site classification to FCS  Flexibility of the Discrete Event Model 28 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

29  Sanitation Related Scenarios  Some NFCS cleaned FCS, Increase the effectiveness of cleaning, No sanitation, …  Worker Behavior Related Scenarios  No glove, No contact glove-case, Preslice products in the morning, Do not slice product on gloves  Growth Inhibitor Related Scenarios  All products with GI, No product with GI  Cross contamination Related Scenarios  Separate slicers, No cross contamination  Storage Temperature and Duration Related Scenarios  Temperature in compliance with FDA food code, Temperature set so that no growth can occur 29 May 22 nd, 2013 Interagency Risk Assessment--Listeria monocytogenes in Retail Delicatessens Public Meeting

30  Design  Data Sources  Implementation  Modeling Approach  Key Findings 30 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

31 31 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

32 Multiple Niche 100W No Niche Incoming Growth Chub Incoming Non-growth Chub Temp. Control Niche & Temp. Control Predicted risk per serving, susceptible population 2 1.7×10 -7 1.4×10 -7 16.6×10 -7 2.8×10 -7 1.2×10 -7 1.5×10 -7 Sanitation Related Scenarios: Percent Change Relative to Baseline Wash & Sanitize: Increase the effectiveness of cleaning from simply washing to washing and sanitizing -1.61.7-0.62.0-1.3-7.6 * Clean 8 Sporadic: Double the number of sites cleaned from 4 to 8 -4.2-4.1 * -0.7-1.9-0.51.3 No Sanitation: No wiping, washing, or sanitizing 41.3 * 7.9 * 2.9 * 23.5 * 11.9 * 50.2 * No Sporadic Cleaning: Clean as required by the 2009 FDA Food Code, but no additional sporadic cleanings 3.0-3.0-0.41.7 3.5 NFCS As FCS: Workers clean deli NFCSs at same rate as FCSs -3.00.7-0.60.3-5.4 * 0.9 Worker Behavior Related Scenarios: No Glove: Workers do not use gloves when serving customers 5.1 * 2.51.28.5 * 6.0 * 7.0 * Gloves Every Serving: Workers change gloves before every sale 4.10.7 0.6-0.20.6 No Contact Glove Case: Workers do not use their hands to open the deli case (e.g. if a floor switch is used) -1.4-3.4-1.31.3 -0.3 Pre-slice: Workers pre-slice RTE products in the morning, after cleaning 6.0 * 24.9 * 49.5 * -34.4 * 19.2 * 1.0 Separate Slicer: Workers use a separate slicer for RTE products that support growth of L. monocytogenes -6.3 * -0.6-1.7 * 22.7 * -0.84.6 Do Not Slice On Gloves: Workers collect the slices of RTE products on tissue paper rather than on his/her gloved hand 1.91.00.23.8-1.98.0 * Growth Inhibitor Related Scenarios: All GI: Reformulate all RTE products sold at the retail deli that would otherwise support L. monocytogenes growth to include growth inhibitors -96.0 * -95.2 * -97.5 * -94.5 * -94.4 * -94.8 * No GI: Reformulate all RTE products that support L. monocytogenes growth that are sold at the retail deli to not include GI to restrict L. monocytogenes growth 184.1 * 191.5 * 35.1 * 190.5 * 187.7 * 188.9 * Cross Contamination Related Scenarios: Transfers to 0: Cross contamination would only result from the deli slicer -4.32.51.03.70.2-0.3 Transfers and Slicer to 0: No cross contamination in the retail deli -33.8 * -18.6 * -9.5 * -60.8 * -19.2 * -30.4 * Reduce Level: Mean incoming L. monocytogenes concentration in all RTE products lowered from -9.2 to -9.5 log 10 cfu/g -21.6 * -24.2 * -1.1-9.8 * -22.5 * -15.6 * Separate Slicer Case: Workers use a separate slicer and a separate deli case for RTE products that support the growth of L. monocytogenes. -2.5-1.6-1.221.0 * -0.97.5 * Lower Env Cont: Reduce transfer of L. monocytogenes among RTE products, FCSs, and NFCs (i.e., reduce transfer coefficients by 50%) -4.5-4.4 * -1.40.41.60.9 Storage Temperature and Duration Control Related Scenarios: Temp = 5°C: Set the retail deli case temperature to 5°C (41°F) (i.e., in compliance with the 2009 FDA Food Code) for all delis, instead of using the deli case temperatures reported by Ecosure -4.8-14.3 * -8.1 * -2.8NA No Growth (T=-5°C): At this temperature, no L. monocytogenes growth will occur -16.5 * -21.3 * -18.2 * -5.7 * NA Temp  5°C: Use only the retail deli case temperatures observed in the Ecosure dataset at or below 5°C (41°F). -9.0 * -16.3 * -12.3 * -8.2 * NA Shorten Time in Retail Delis: Reduce the length of time RTE products are held before they are sold or disposed from 7 to 4 days -2.53.3-1.22.0-0.21.7

33  Observed sanitation practices critical in reducing risk.  Stopping sanitation increased risk across all baselines.  Additional sanitation (more effective cleaning, more frequent cleaning, …) generally not significant. 33 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

34  Glove changes observed ~65% of customers.  Never using gloves increased risk in 4 of 6 baselines.  Changing gloves for every customer led to no significant risk reduction. 34 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

35  Changes to worker behavior sometimes depended on the type of baseline store. 35 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

36  Growth inhibitors prevented growth both at retail and at home.  Broad growth inhibitor use led to dramatic reduction in risk. 36 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

37  Reducing incoming mean concentrations by factor of 2 reduced risk across all baselines except incoming growth chub. 37 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

38  Eliminating cross contamination reduced risk across all baselines, especially incoming non growth chub  Slicer is primary nexus for cross contamination.

39  If retail delis simply followed the FDA recommended temperature versus current observed practice, an 8-16% reduction could be achieved.  Reduces in-store growth 39 June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

40  To reduce predicted risks of listeriosis to consumers ◦ Prevent Lm entering deli department  from incoming growth supporting product  from incoming non growth supporting product  from environment / niches ◦ Increase growth inhibitor use (prevent growth at retail/home) ◦ Improve temperature control (deli case <41 o F)) ◦ Maintain adequate sanitation & glove use ◦ Pre-slicing increases the risk of listeriosis 40 No single intervention will eliminate listeriosis risk from food sold at retail delis. Instead, there are a host of steps that deli operators and suppliers can take to reduce the risk. June 18, 2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/USDA-ORACBA Washington, DC

41 Draft Interagency Risk Assessment—Listeria monocytogenes in Retail Delicatessens (May 2013) Model, Report and Interpretive Summary available at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/science/ri sk-assessments Public meeting agenda and presentations available at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/newsroom/meet ings/past-meetings/05-22-2013/agenda-05-22-2013 Seeking public comment (Docket FSIS-2013-0019) by July 12, 2013: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/frame- redirect?url=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPPDE/rdad/FRPub s/2013-0019.htm http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/frame- redirect?url=http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPPDE/rdad/FRPub s/2013-0019.htm

Download ppt "2013 IRAC/NCAC-SRA/ORACA Risk Analysis Workshop: Advancing Analysis Washington, DC – USDA South Building – June 18, 2013 Janell Kause (FSIS) Sherri Dennis."

Similar presentations

UPDATE: Assessment of the Relative Risk to Public Health from Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes Among Selected Categories of Ready-to-Eat Foods Robert L.

UPDATE: Assessment of the Relative Risk to Public Health from Foodborne Listeria monocytogenes Among Selected Categories of Ready-to-Eat Foods Robert L.
RESULTS OF LISTERIA SAMPLING IN CRAWFISH PROCESSING PLANTS.

RESULTS OF LISTERIA SAMPLING IN CRAWFISH PROCESSING PLANTS.
Listeria Controls in Finished Product (Higher Risk) Areas

Listeria Controls in Finished Product (Higher Risk) Areas
FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls

FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
Putting Principles into Practice: Useful Case Studies 701 13 th Street, N.W., Suite 750, Washington, DC, 20005, USA

Putting Principles into Practice: Useful Case Studies th Street, N.W., Suite 750, Washington, DC, 20005, USA
Strategies for Implementing a Listeria Control Plan The Big Picture.

Strategies for Implementing a Listeria Control Plan The Big Picture.
NFPA Survey on L. monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods Yuhuan Chen, Jenny Scott National Food Processors Association Research Foundation.

NFPA Survey on L. monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods Yuhuan Chen, Jenny Scott National Food Processors Association Research Foundation.
Listeria monocytogenes in the Retail Environment ©2006 Department of Food Science - College of Agricultural Sciences at Penn State University Penn State.

Listeria monocytogenes in the Retail Environment ©2006 Department of Food Science - College of Agricultural Sciences at Penn State University Penn State.
3-1. Key Sanitation Condition No. 3:  Employee ‘practices’ to prevent cross-contamination;  Separation of raw and ready-to-eat foods; and  Plant design.

3-1. Key Sanitation Condition No. 3:  Employee ‘practices’ to prevent cross-contamination;  Separation of raw and ready-to-eat foods; and  Plant design.
1 November 2006 Reducing Foodborne Illness Risk Factors in Food Service and Retail Establishments.

1 November 2006 Reducing Foodborne Illness Risk Factors in Food Service and Retail Establishments.
MODULE 3 PREVENTING CONTAMINATION CONTAMINATION. Cross - Contamination Cross-contamination is the transfer of a harmful substance to food by vehicles.

MODULE 3 PREVENTING CONTAMINATION CONTAMINATION. Cross - Contamination Cross-contamination is the transfer of a harmful substance to food by vehicles.
Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens

Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens
1 Webinar: Assessment of the risk of human salmonellosis associated with the consumption of tree nuts Monday, July 22 nd 12 – 1 pm ET.

1 Webinar: Assessment of the risk of human salmonellosis associated with the consumption of tree nuts Monday, July 22 nd 12 – 1 pm ET.
Lessons Learned in Initiating and Conducting Risk Assessments within a Risk Analysis Framework: A FDA/CFSAN Approach Robert Buchanan DHHS Food and Drug.

Lessons Learned in Initiating and Conducting Risk Assessments within a Risk Analysis Framework: A FDA/CFSAN Approach Robert Buchanan DHHS Food and Drug.
Preventing Introduction, Growth and Cross-Contamination of Listeria monocytogenes ©2006 Department of Food Science - College of Agricultural Sciences at.

Preventing Introduction, Growth and Cross-Contamination of Listeria monocytogenes ©2006 Department of Food Science - College of Agricultural Sciences at.
Food Safety Risk Assessment - PubH 7100-104 1 of 40 Overview of 3 published risk assessments Don Schaffner, Ph.D. Rutgers, The State University of NJ.

Food Safety Risk Assessment - PubH of 40 Overview of 3 published risk assessments Don Schaffner, Ph.D. Rutgers, The State University of NJ.
UAE Food Safety Crosses Borders Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health February 24, 2014.

UAE Food Safety Crosses Borders Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health February 24, 2014.
1 MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATION’S FOODSERVICE AND RETAIL FOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM.

1 MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATION’S FOODSERVICE AND RETAIL FOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM.
Janell R. Kause, MPH/MPP U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Conducting Risk Assessments to Guide Food Safety Decisions Addressing.

Janell R. Kause, MPH/MPP U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Conducting Risk Assessments to Guide Food Safety Decisions Addressing.
Providing Safe Food Objectives: Recognize the importance of food safety Understand how food becomes unsafe Identify TCS food Recognize the risk factors.

Providing Safe Food Objectives: Recognize the importance of food safety Understand how food becomes unsafe Identify TCS food Recognize the risk factors.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google