Download presentation
1
The Red Imported Fire Ant in California
Dr. Les Greenberg University of California, Riverside
2
Origin of Imported Fire Ants
South America: Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina
3
U.S. Introduction Introduction to Mobile, Alabama, between 1930-1940
Probably arrived in ship ballast From there, spread outward to the Southeast and West
4
Fire ant quarantine
6
Potential spread of fire ants
Originally 10° F. isothermal line; now at 0° F. Limiting factor of moisture Adaptation to man-made environment
7
U. S. Expansion
10
Mating
11
Fire Ant Dispersal
12
Stinging and Pustule Formation
13
Transformers Shorted
14
Infested Areas of Southern California
15
Locating Infestations
Visual inspection Luncheon meat Corn chips
16
Nurseries in Trabuco Canyon
17
Subterranean Trail Under Plastic
18
Flower beds in Los Alamitos
19
Coachella Valley Golf Courses
20
Mounds on Mowed Grass
21
Mound at Sprinkler
22
Exit holes from underground foraging trails on putting green
23
Cleveland National Forest
24
2500 ft
25
Wetlands Rancho Santa Margarita
26
Infested Areas of the Central Valley
27
Almond Groves in Central Valley
30
Biological Control Agents
Phorid flies: decapitating flies Protozoan parasites: Thelohania Other species of ants
31
Phorid Flies
32
Phorid Flies (Decapitating Flies)
33
Phorid Flies
34
Phorid Fly Release
35
Phorid Fly Releases
36
Phorid Fly Releases Between 1996 and 2002 the decapitating fly, Pseudacteon tricuspis, was released at 56 sites in the southeastern United States Most releases have been made by the USDA-ARS, CMAVE, Gainesville, FL ( 32 sites) and the University of Texas, Austin (15 sites).
37
Phorid Fly Releases Overwintering populations of flies were successfully established at 19 sites in 6 states (AL-3, FL- 5, LA-3, MS-1, SC-2, TX-5).
38
Phorid Fly Expansion in Florida
39
Thelohania solenopsae, a microsporidian intracellular parasite
The most common fire ant pathogen in Brazil It was discovered in the US in 1998 (FL, TX, MS, OK). Decreases ant’s longevity and reduces colony size
40
Inoculating Mound with Thelohania
41
Insecticide Runoff from Treated Houses
42
Treatments 2007 Treatments used 3 gals fipronil spray perimeter
1 gal fipronil spot 3 gals bifenthrin spray Combination of fipronil spray and bifenthrin granules Bait stations with imidacloprid
43
Data From a Typical House
Lawn area measured Water meter recorded Runoff estimated Sprinkler locations mapped Collection site noted Time that irrigation is on
44
Water collection dam
45
Dam placement at curb 4-in styrofoam cut into U-shape
Sand bags on styrofoam Styrofoam and sand bags put inside disposable plastic bags
46
Sample collection
47
60-ml aquatic pipette
48
Volumetric flow rate (Q), the volume of fluid which passes through a given volume per unit time
Q = A x v, where A = area (depth and width of water stream) v = uniform average velocity of water (how long it takes to flow a known distance) Q*time - gives us an estimate of total water runoff
49
Sample processing One liter sample collected from one bank of sprinklers per house Sample stored at 40C Sample analyzed at laboratory of Dr. Jay Gan in environmental sciences, UC Riverside
50
Schedule 2007 Pretreatment ant evaluations and water samples collected in June Post-treatment ant evaluations done at 1,2,4,and 8 weeks Post-treatment water samples collected at 1, 4, and 8 weeks
51
Concentration of fipronil and its byproducts in runoff
desulfinyl sulfide sulfone
52
Concentrations of fipronil and bifenthrin in runoff
With Ceriodaphnia LD50s Fipronil LD50 Bifenthrin LD50
53
2008 6 different pesticide treatments
3 houses sampled per treatment for insecticide runoff = 18 houses sampled Sample periods Pretreatment 1 day 1 week 2 week driveway flush
54
This summer’s fipronil treatments
All fipronil treatments limited to 1 gal 1 gal peripheral spray -- pin stream nozzle Spot treatments Same as above but not within 15 ft of street and 5 ft of sidewalks
55
This summer’s bifenthrin treatments
All use 3 gals Pin stream nozzle perimeter treatment Traditional fan nozzle perimeter application Spot treatments with 3 gals, but not within 15 ft of street or 5 ft of sidewalks
56
Conclusions We can successfully monitor how much insecticide runs off from treated houses due to irrigation We can test different application techniques to minimize insecticide runoff
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.