1. ADMINISTRATIVE REORGANIZATION Preliminary Presentation to College Council October 18, 2013

2. Guiding Principle Create an administrative structure that promotes the values, mission and strategic focus of the college in the 21 st century.

3. Role of the College Council College Council sponsored the reorganization process. Three members from the College Council chaired the work of a Task Force with appointments from the Academic Senate, Classified Union, and the Student Government Association. An external consultant facilitated the work.

4. The Task Force Chairs: Pam Boyles, Nan Gomez-Heitzeberg, Jennifer Marden Classified: Bernadette Martinez (Counseling); Heather Skibinski (Financial Aid), Connie Gonzales (MESA) Faculty: Ann Tatum (English), Brent Damron (Health & Physical Education), Alice Desilagua (Counseling), John Giertz (Communication), Management : Todd Coston (IT, Admin Services, Professional Development), Leah Carter (CTE), Sue Vaughn (Student Affairs) Students: Travis Tillis, SGA President Budget Analyst: Laura Lorigo Consultant: Dr. Pat Caldwell

5. Charge to the Task Force The Task Force was charged with delivering a document that presents three options for the administrative structure of Bakersfield College with pros and cons for each option along with the budgetary impact.

6. Why Reorganization? In October, 2012 a new President was hired for Bakersfield College. In order to assure a smooth transition, the Bakersfield College Administrative Transition Team (BCATT) was formed. Over time, a new set of core values and a new strategic focus were developed. It was decided that the College needed an organizational structure that aligned with these new priorities and that promoted the creation of a working and learning environment that supports the diverse student and staff population.

7. Process The Task Force was divided into three teams, each charged with reviewing past Bakersfield College organizational structures as well as the structures of other colleges. Each team considered the pros and cons of the structures it studied, and discussed features that might be beneficial to Bakersfield College. The teams then each developed an organizational chart, resulting in three options for a possible new structure for the College. The proposed options were presented to College Council for their review and consideration.

8. Proposals The following are three proposed options for a new Bakersfield College administrative structure. Each of the three Task Force teams has included an overview of its proposed structure, an organizational chart, the pros and cons of the structure, and the budgetary impact.

9. Proposal “A” Overview Overview: Why this structure?

10. Proposal “A” Organizational Chart

13. Proposal “A” Pros and Cons

14. Proposal “A” Budget Impact

15. Proposal “B” Overview Overview: Why this structure?

16. Proposal “B” Organizational Chart

19. Proposal “B” Pros and Cons

20. Proposal “B” Budget Impact

21. Proposal “C” Overview Overview: Why this structure?

22. Proposal “C” Organizational Chart

25. Proposal “C” Pros and Cons

26. Proposal “C” Budget Impact

27. Appendices Appendix 1Core Values Appendix 2: Strategic Focus Appendix 3:Philosophical Criterion Developed by Task Force to Guide Their Work Appendix 4: Schedule of Focus Groups and Open Forums Appendix 5:Summary of Participants’ Responses to Questions Asked at Focus Groups and Open Forums Appendix 6:Historical BC Organizational Charts Appendix 7: Organizational Charts From Other Campuses

28. Next Steps Presentation to College Council Recommendation to President Decision Making Implementation Timeline