Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEdwina Dorsey Modified over 9 years ago
1
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, Huis in ‘t Veld R, Hermens H, Stramigioli S, Rietman H, Veltink P, Misra S. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):719–38. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0161 Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective Bart Peerdeman, MSc; Daphne Boere, MSc; Heidi Witteveen, MSc; Rianne Huis in ‘t Veld, PhD; Hermie Hermens, PhD; Stefano Stramigioli, PhD; Hans Rietman, MD, PhD; Peter Veltink, PhD; Sarthak Misra, PhD
2
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, Huis in ‘t Veld R, Hermens H, Stramigioli S, Rietman H, Veltink P, Misra S. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):719–38. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0161 Study Aims – Describe process of determining functional requirements for forearm prostheses. – Apply these requirements to evaluate state of the art in myoelectric (ME) forearm prosthesis research. Relevance – Despite significant technological advancements, many persons with amputation choose not to use ME prostheses.
3
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, Huis in ‘t Veld R, Hermens H, Stramigioli S, Rietman H, Veltink P, Misra S. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):719–38. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0161 Myoelectric Forearm Prosthesis Signal flow in sound human forearm vs desired signal flow and main subsystems of modern myoelectric forearm prosthesis. EMG = electromyographic.
4
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, Huis in ‘t Veld R, Hermens H, Stramigioli S, Rietman H, Veltink P, Misra S. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):719–38. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0161 Methods Needs-assessment workshop (clinicians, academics, and engineers) and literature review identified requirements for user acceptance: – More functions. – Faster reaction and execution. – More intuitive control and feedback.
5
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, Huis in ‘t Veld R, Hermens H, Stramigioli S, Rietman H, Veltink P, Misra S. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):719–38. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0161 Conclusions Modern prosthetic prototypes only partly fulfill user acceptance requirements. Future research should focus on – Force and position feedback. – Simultaneous control of grasps and wrist movements to increase natural motion and intuitiveness. – Automation of object holding and slip prevention during bimanual tasks. – Alternative actuation to decrease reaction times.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.