Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparative Performance of Racing Head and Neck Restraints Gregg S. Baker, P.E. General Technical Properties, LLC Orlando, Florida USA (SAE Paper #2006-01-3631)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparative Performance of Racing Head and Neck Restraints Gregg S. Baker, P.E. General Technical Properties, LLC Orlando, Florida USA (SAE Paper #2006-01-3631)"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Comparative Performance of Racing Head and Neck Restraints Gregg S. Baker, P.E. General Technical Properties, LLC Orlando, Florida USA (SAE Paper #2006-01-3631)

3 3 Project Resources General Technical Properties, LLC –Intellectual Property Company Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights –Applications since 1987 Biomechanics –Structural implants »Spinal/craniofacial reconstruction systems »Arthroplasty devices (artificial joints) –Linear accelerator targeting systems (radiosurgery) –Electronically controlled implants Fastening systems IC Engine valve designs WEB-based mass customization software

4 4 Resources (Cont.) Outside Consultants -Rod Henry, P.E. – General Dynamics “High impact devices” -Leon Kazarian, Ph.D. NASA, U.S. Air Force and Navy (ejection seats, carrier landings, helicopter crashes, Shuttle Challenger post mortem) -Wayne State University, Bioengineering Center -Delphi Safety Systems

5 5 The Safety Progression 1.That’s racing 2.“This should work” 3.Serious efforts

6 6 Nothing we can do…

7 7 “Hey ya’ll, watch this!”

8 Serious (?) Efforts Some Recent Ideas

9 9 How well do they perform?

10 10 The First Crash Test George White, 1980

11 11

12 Products that have been tested <2004 White Device HANS Hutchens D-Del Isaac Wright Tucker >2004 Isaac Link R3 Hutchens II Hybrid Leatt Brace

13 13 Previous Efforts SAE paper #2002-01-3304, “Sled Test Evaluation of Racecar Head/Neck Restraints” SAE paper #2004-01-3516, “Sled Test Evaluation of Racecar Head/Neck Restraints Revisited”

14 14 SAE paper #2002-01-3304, “Sled Test Evaluation of Racecar Head/Neck Restraints” HANS device Hutchens device D-Cel device

15 15 SAE paper #2004-01-3516, “Sled Test Evaluation of Racecar Head/Neck Restraints Revisited” HANS device Hutchens device D-Cel device

16 16 In the Perfect World… Every product Every test protocol Every load measure

17 17 Plan B: Get what you can and see what ya got

18 18 Data Sources Peer-reviewed publications Unpublished raw test data Summary results from manufacturers

19 19 Data Set Nine products 21 crash tests ~200 summary load measures

20 20 Test Protocols (30 Degree Offset) Wayne State University Bioengineering Center “NASCAR” test Delphi Safety Systems Test Center execution of SFI Specification 38.1

21 21 Wayne State 50G decelerating sled w/o head support, w/seat

22 22 Wayne State Real Time

23 23 Wayne State Slow Motion

24 24 Delphi 70G accelerating sled w/o head support, w/o seat

25 25 Delphi Real Time

26 26 Delphi Slow Motion

27 27 Performance Measures Loads -Axial (Tension/Compression) -Shear -Bending Head Gs Composite measures -HIC -Nij, etc.

28 28 Load Direction

29 29 Wayne State

30 30

31 31

32 32

33 33 SFI 38.1 at Delphi

34 34

35 35

36 36

37 37

38 38 “Brain Slosh” references SAE Paper #2004-01-3539, Brain Injury Prediction for Indy Race Car Drivers Using Finite Element Model of the Human Head, L. Zhang et al

39 39

40 40

41 41

42 42 Composite measures Where:

43 43

44 44

45 45 What does it all mean? How do we add this up?

46 46 Possible Options 1.Extend the Nij concept 2.Utilize fundamental stress analysis

47 47 Option 1 Extended Nij

48 Option 2 Fundamental Stress Analysis Does the load exceed the strength? If so, we have BSF

49 49 What’s the Strength? Healthy 30-40 yo femur/tibia samples at room temp: Ultimate Strength in Tension: 136-154 MPa Ultimate Strength in Compression: 209-213 MPa Source: Burstein, A.H. et al, J. Bone Joint Surg., 58A, 82, 1976

50 50 What’s the Load? 1.Sum “F” and “M” values to determine axial loads. 2.Consider shear to resolve principle loads.

51 51 Occipital Condyles

52 52

53 53 Fz Mx

54 54

55 55

56 56 Principle Stresses

57 57

58 58

59 59 Conclusions Performance ~ f(1/length, stiffness) Dampers are magic Engaging the belt retains the belt Classic measures, while valuable, do not tell the whole story There is a significant need for simplification

60 60 Acknowledgements Rod Henry, General Dynamics George White Jay Wright Wayne State Bioengineering Center Delphi Safety Systems Test Center

61 61 Thank you http://www.isaacdirect.com/ http://www.isaacdirect.com/


Download ppt "Comparative Performance of Racing Head and Neck Restraints Gregg S. Baker, P.E. General Technical Properties, LLC Orlando, Florida USA (SAE Paper #2006-01-3631)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google