Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDonna Jordan Modified over 9 years ago
1
eRA OneView Gateway to eRA
2
2 Agenda Business Case Business Case Functional Case Functional Case Prototype Prototype Technical Case Technical Case Timeline Timeline
3
3 Business Case: Simplifying The Grant Process Workflow begins with eReceipt Workflow begins with eReceipt Downstream Processing – electronic instead of paper Downstream Processing – electronic instead of paper eRA View should be consistent eRA View should be consistent Login Login Notification Notification Managing requests Managing requests Support Different Processes Support Different Processes OPDIVS OPDIVS ICs ICs Workload Management Workload Management eRequests – One Infrastructure for processing eRequests – One Infrastructure for processing Whether Application, Correction, Change of PI, Whether Application, Correction, Change of PI, Regardless of user, PI to SO to SRA to PO to GS to PI/SO Regardless of user, PI to SO to SRA to PO to GS to PI/SO
4
4 Business Case: OneView Solution OneView is an integrated approach to initiate and process all eRA transactions electronically OneView is an integrated approach to initiate and process all eRA transactions electronically eRA Single Login: Same view for all users across all eRA applications eRA Single Login: Same view for all users across all eRA applications Workflow: Single interface to initiate and process a request with HHS and Grantee Community Workflow: Single interface to initiate and process a request with HHS and Grantee Community eNotification: Single method for notification of actions/events throughout eRA eNotification: Single method for notification of actions/events throughout eRA
5
5 Dependencies on OneView eSubmissions for electronic Corrections eSubmissions for electronic Corrections eCGAP RR (currently has their own) eCGAP RR (currently has their own) OPDIVs OPDIVs Commons Commons Grants Management Grants Management Training Activities Training Activities Note: Without a Centralized Workflow Solution each business area will need to build a customized solution.
6
6 Business Case: History eRA Portal Prototype 2001 eRA Portal Prototype 2001 eRA Project Team Retreat 2003 – Hot topics: (Workflow, SSO, eNotification) eRA Project Team Retreat 2003 – Hot topics: (Workflow, SSO, eNotification) Single Sign On Initiative Priority 2004 Single Sign On Initiative Priority 2004 OMB memorandum “e-Authentication Guidance for federal agencies” (M04-04 dated December 16, 2003). OMB memorandum “e-Authentication Guidance for federal agencies” (M04-04 dated December 16, 2003). Workflow Tool Evaluation & Elaboration 2004 Workflow Tool Evaluation & Elaboration 2004 GM/OneView task order awarded April, 2005 GM/OneView task order awarded April, 2005 ACR/ARA (eRequest) task order awarded Sept., 2005 ACR/ARA (eRequest) task order awarded Sept., 2005
7
7 Business Case: Advocate Support Project Team approved proposed solution on Feb. 9 th 2005. Project Team approved proposed solution on Feb. 9 th 2005. eRA teams are working closely with User Groups (OPDivs, R&R, SRAs, POs, GM, Grantees) who have invested time and energy in defining requirements for the following: eRA teams are working closely with User Groups (OPDivs, R&R, SRAs, POs, GM, Grantees) who have invested time and energy in defining requirements for the following: ACR & ARAs ACR & ARAs Commons Electronic Requests Commons Electronic Requests GM & PGM internal approval processing GM & PGM internal approval processing User Groups are engaged in identifying upstream & downstream processing requirements to support electronic grant applications. User Groups are engaged in identifying upstream & downstream processing requirements to support electronic grant applications.
8
8 Business Case: Current Status OneView in Test now (SSO, Workflow infrastructure, eNotifications) OneView in Test now (SSO, Workflow infrastructure, eNotifications) User Admin in Test now to support SSO User Admin in Test now to support SSO Jan. ’06 OneView & User Admin Release to Production Jan. ’06 OneView & User Admin Release to Production Jan. ’06 ACR User Pilot in Stage Jan. ’06 ACR User Pilot in Stage Feb. ‘06 GM, Closeout & Checklist integration with OneView. Feb. ‘06 GM, Closeout & Checklist integration with OneView.
9
9 Business Case: Future Needs ’06 - Integrating all J2EE Applications with OneView ’06 - Integrating all J2EE Applications with OneView ’06 - Defining other types of eRequests ’06 - Defining other types of eRequests ’06 – ‘07 – Developing other eRequests ’06 – ‘07 – Developing other eRequests ’06 - Supporting Administration Tool Upgrade (User Admin Module) on the critical path ’06 - Supporting Administration Tool Upgrade (User Admin Module) on the critical path ’06 - Internal Routing and Approvals (GM & PGM) ’06 - Internal Routing and Approvals (GM & PGM) ’06 – VOL (Org Hierarchy) ’06 – VOL (Org Hierarchy) ’07? - Integrating with NIH SSO ’07? - Integrating with NIH SSO
10
10 Functionality: Solutions Single Point of Entry to all eRA Applications Single Point of Entry to all eRA Applications One step closer to integrate with NIH SSO One step closer to integrate with NIH SSO Integrated Home Page and Menu structure Integrated Home Page and Menu structure Uniform Look and Feel Uniform Look and Feel Immediate Access to assigned Action items and Notifications Immediate Access to assigned Action items and Notifications Uniformed and Centralized way to submit and process electronic requests Uniformed and Centralized way to submit and process electronic requests
11
11 Functionality: Solutions (Cont.) Increased communications and content management of it – eNotification Increased communications and content management of it – eNotification Support of existing and upcoming electronic processes Support of existing and upcoming electronic processes Retirement of paper-based processes Retirement of paper-based processes Better Workload management Better Workload management Increased data mining abilities for various processes and identification of bottlenecks Increased data mining abilities for various processes and identification of bottlenecks OPDIVs support OPDIVs support Centralized Rules for Validation and Processing Centralized Rules for Validation and Processing
12
12 Functionality: Demonstration
13
13 eRA SSO Single point of entry into eRA applications Single point of entry into eRA applications First step to eventually integrate with NIH SSO First step to eventually integrate with NIH SSO Facilitates easier and manageable deployments (e.g. easily separate IAR and Commons) Facilitates easier and manageable deployments (e.g. easily separate IAR and Commons) Centralized Menu integrates applications based on the user permissions Centralized Menu integrates applications based on the user permissions Authentication is outside the application code – industry best practices Authentication is outside the application code – industry best practices Removes overhead-intensive authentication process – will help reduce the database and LDAP load Removes overhead-intensive authentication process – will help reduce the database and LDAP load Provides a more flexible approach for implementing authorization Provides a more flexible approach for implementing authorization User can continue to use same userid/password for both C/S and SSO applications User can continue to use same userid/password for both C/S and SSO applications
14
14 eRA Workflow Removes the inconsistent workflows out of the application code Removes the inconsistent workflows out of the application code Makes the actual applications light weight Makes the actual applications light weight Reduces new design and development cost - in time and resource Reduces new design and development cost - in time and resource Performance & Ease of Use Performance & Ease of Use Focuses the user work on the event based processes rather than expensive (database) searches Focuses the user work on the event based processes rather than expensive (database) searches Manageability Manageability Changes to the workflow does not require significant application changes (reducing the maintenance) Changes to the workflow does not require significant application changes (reducing the maintenance) Configurable workflow provides flexibility to adopt changes in business processes Configurable workflow provides flexibility to adopt changes in business processes Centralized management of process definitions and its implementation Centralized management of process definitions and its implementation Seamless integration in and out of eRA applications enabled by SSO Seamless integration in and out of eRA applications enabled by SSO Scalable and abstracted solution Scalable and abstracted solution Designed to migrate to other and emerging technologies Designed to migrate to other and emerging technologies Vertically and Horizontally scalable middle-tier Vertically and Horizontally scalable middle-tier Standard based business rules implementation Standard based business rules implementation Easier changes in the business rules as the NIH policies change Easier changes in the business rules as the NIH policies change
15
15 OneView requirements don’t fit current technical implementation
16
16 Planned implementation meets OneView requirements
17
Project Schedule - 2005 Timeline
18
Project Schedule - 2006 Timeline
19
19 The Bottom Line Are we going paperless? Are we going paperless? Multiple task orders are dependent on the OneView workflow functionality Multiple task orders are dependent on the OneView workflow functionality Current architectures does not support integration with NIH Single Signon Current architectures does not support integration with NIH Single Signon "This is the vision for eRA that I've been looking for." "This is the vision for eRA that I've been looking for."
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.