Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKory Horton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Pension Reform: What ’ s Next? September 30, 2011
2
2 Today ’ s topics Current pension reform proposal Senate Bill S.2018 Pension reforms in other states Group discussion
3
Current reform proposal S. 2018: An Act Providing for Additional Pension Reform and Benefits Modernization
4
Affecting new members after 1/1/2012: Increases salary average period from 3 years to 5 years Increases minimum retirement age from 55 to 60 Members cannot retire before age 60 Review by Admin. & Finance every 5 yrs for new members Increases age to reach maximum age factor from 65 to 67 Eliminates termination retirement allowance Senate Bill – S. 2018
5
Affecting new members after 1/1/2012: Reduces age factors by.15% for each year below age 67 For members with at least 35 years of service, reduces age factors by.125% each year Senate Bill – S. 2018
6
Reduces age factors*: Age Current Proposed Proposed Factor (1-34 yrs) (35+ yrs) 67.025.025.025 65.025.022.0225 62.022.0175.01875 60.020.0145**.01625 58.018 n/a n/a 55.015 n/a n/a * Factors subject to review by Legislature if normal retirement age for Social Security changes **Minimum age factor for in service death benefits would be.0145 instead of.015 Senate Bill – S. 2018
7
Benefit impact for new members after 1/1/2012 Examples: Regular retiree w/ 30 years at age 60: Current:.020 x 30 = 60% of 3-yr average Proposed:.0145 x 30 = 43.5% of 5-yr average Regular retiree with 35 years at age 60: Current:.020 x 35 = 70% of 3-yr average Proposed:.01625 x 35 = 56.875% of 5-yr average R+ retiree with 34 yrs of service at age 58: Current:.018 x 34 = 61.2% + 20% = 80% Proposed: would not be eligible to retire! Senate Bill – S. 2018
8
Affecting new members after 1/1/2012: Begins the R+ 2% add-on after 23 years rather than 24: Member age 60 with 30 years:.0145 x 30 = 43.5% + 14% = 57.5% Member age 60 with 35 years:.01625 x 35 = 56.875% + 24% = 80% Reduces contribution rate for any member with at least 35 years of creditable service Rate reduced to 4% for non-R+ members Rate reduced to 6% for R+ members Senate Bill – S. 2018
9
Affecting current members: Beginning on 1/1/2012, charges 8.25% interest (v. 4.125%) on refund buybacks made more than one year after member returns to service. Grants up to 4 years of service credit to members who retired before 9/1/2000 and had a maternity leave before 1/1/75; benefit increase on 1/1/12. Increases minimum survivor benefit from $250/month to $500/month beginning 7/1/2011. Members subject to forfeiture pursuant to §15, must pay back any benefits received after the date of offense for which member was convicted. Senate Bill – S. 2018
10
Affecting current members: Would increase COLA base from $12,000 to $13,000 Would amend c. 32, §28K to allow members on a part-time or full-time leave of absence for the purpose of acting as a representative of an employee organization to receive creditable service for such leave provided the member makes the full monthly retirement contributions (previously, this provision only applied to members on a full-time leave). Senate Bill – S. 2018
11
Affecting current members: Would allow a member who: retired on or before May 17, 2004, chose Option A or Option B, and married a same sex partner before 5/17/05 to change his or her option to Option C using the factors that were in effect on the member ’ s retirement date. Change must be requested by 7/1/2012 Senate Bill – S. 2018
12
Affecting current members who retire after 1/1/2012: “ Anti-spiking ” provision #1: The final salary average will exclude any increases that exceed the average of the prior two years by more than 10%... Senate Bill – S. 2018
13
Anti-spiking example - Administrator Affecting members who retire after 1/1/2012 Average of % diff Capped YearSalary prior 2 yrs (10% max) Amount 09-10$120,000 10-11$125,000 11-12$135,000 $122,500 10.2% $134,750 12-13$155,000 $130,000 19% $143,000 13-14$160,000 $145,000 10.3% $159,500 Ave:$150,000 $145,750 Senate Bill – S. 2018
14
Anti-spiking example - Teacher Affecting members who retire after 1/1/2012 Average of % diff Capped YearSalary prior 2 yrs (10% max) Amount 09-10$70,000 10-11$72,000 11-12$80,000* $71,000 12.7% $78,100 12-13$82,500 $76,000 8.6% $82,500 13-14$89,000** $81,250 9.5% $89,000 Ave:$84,667 $83,200 * 3% raise + $4,000 stipend + extra $2,000 longevity ** 3% raise + stipend, longevity + lane change (Masters + 60) Based on exemptions, the cap may not apply…. Senate Bill – S. 2018
15
Affecting current members who retire after 1/1/2012: Anti-spiking provision – exemptions Does not apply to increases resulting from… an increase in hours of employment a bona fide change in position, excluding a modification in the salary or salary schedule negotiated for bargaining unit members under chapter 150E the performance of additional services as described in c. 32, § 1. Anti-spiking provision – retirement contributions Any retirement contributions withheld on capped compensation will be refunded to the member with interest at the actuarial assumed rate (8.25%) Senate Bill – S. 2018
16
Affecting current members who retire after 1/1/2012: “ Anti-spiking ” provision #2: If the difference in annual regular compensation between any 2 consecutive years of the last 5 years of creditable service exceeds 100%, the retirement allowance will be based on the average of the last 5 years (instead of the last 3) Senate Bill – S. 2018
17
Would require PERAC to develop regulations regarding the maximum earnings for post-retirement employment; goal appears to be to increase current limit by $15,000. Senate Bill – S. 2018
18
Pension Reform Pension Reforms in Other States
19
39 states have adopted changes; mores states contemplating reforms Intent of reforms were to Restore/Preserve sustainability of plans Massachusetts reforms are to modernize and preserve plan sustainability Pension reforms passed nationally since 2010:
20
Final Average Salary Most changes increased FAS from 3 to 5 years; at least one increased from 1 year to 3 years; one from 5 to 8 years Vesting Requirements Most changes increased from 5 to 10 yrs. Employee Contributions Most of the changes were in non-Social Security states and increased from.5% to 5% Age and Service Requirements Most changes increased the age at retirement; reduced actuarial factors Types of pension reforms passed nationally:
21
Service Purchases Changes either increased the employee cost; eliminated certain types of purchases or capped the number of years purchased; COLA Benefits Most changes reduced COLA benefits or tied COLA changes to funded status or investment rate of return. When COLA ’ s were reduced they were reduced to a level that is more advantageous than Massachusetts COLA policy Re-employment after retirement Require employers to make a contribution to retirement fund; limit earnings in retirement Types of pension reforms passed nationally:
22
Depending on state and type of change, the reforms were applicable to: New members only; Active and retired members; Active members who had yet to vest; Active members who were less than 5 years away from retirement; Some of the changes were applied incrementally; Some states tied their reforms, or retraction of the reforms to: the funded status of the plan, or the investment rate of return of the system Massachusetts proposed changes affect both active and retired members Employee and Employer Groups affected by the changes:
23
2 Group discussion
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.